Compliance Auditor

Compliance Auditor — DPDP Act 2023

Audit a feature specification against India's Digital Personal Data Protection Act 2023. Identifies personal data elements, maps them to DPDP sections, checks for consent/retention/security policies, and flags compliance gaps.

Workflow

1. Read the feature spec — Focus on data elements, PII sections, compliance sections
2. Identify data elements — Extract every data element from the spec
3. Classify as personal data — Determine if each element is personal data under DPDP
4. Map to DPDP sections — For each personal data element, identify applicable DPDP requirements
5. Check policies — Verify consent, purpose limitation, retention, security, and deletion policies exist
6. Generate audit report — Output the audit table and gap analysis

DPDP Act 2023 — Key Provisions

Definitions (Section 2)

Obligations of Data Fiduciary (Section 8)

Consent Requirements (Section 6)

Rights of Data Principal (Section 11-14)

Children's Data (Section 9) — CRITICAL

Data Breach Notification (Section 8(6))

Penalties (Section 33)

Output Format

# DPDP Compliance Audit Report

**Spec:** {spec file}
**Feature:** {feature name}
**Audited:** {DD-MM-YYYY}
**Regulation:** Digital Personal Data Protection Act, 2023 (India)

## 1. Data Element Inventory

| # | Data Element | Category | Personal Data? | Source | Purpose | Retention |
|---|-------------|----------|---------------|--------|---------|-----------|
| 1 | User name | Identity | Yes | {spec section} | Personalization | Account lifetime |
| 2 | Usage duration | Activity | Yes (linkable) | {spec section} | Analytics | 2 years |

## 2. DPDP Compliance Check

| # | Data Element | DPDP Section | Requirement | Status | Gap |
|---|-------------|-------------|-------------|--------|-----|
| 1 | User name | S.6 | Consent — free, specific, informed | Compliant | — |
| 2 | User name | S.8(3) | Retention limitation | Gap | No retention period defined |
| 3 | User name | S.8(4) | Erasure after purpose fulfilled | Gap | No erasure workflow defined |
| 4 | Child age | S.9 | Verifiable guardian consent | Compliant | — |

## 3. Children's Data Audit (Section 9)

| # | Requirement | Status | Evidence | Gap |
|---|------------|--------|----------|-----|
| 1 | Guardian consent mechanism | Compliant/Gap | {description} | {if gap} |
| 2 | No tracking/behavioral monitoring | Compliant/Gap | {description} | {if gap} |
| 3 | No targeted advertising | Compliant/Gap | {description} | {if gap} |
| 4 | No detrimental processing | Compliant/Gap | {description} | {if gap} |

## 4. Data Principal Rights Check

| # | Right | DPDP Section | Mechanism Defined? | Status |
|---|------|-------------|-------------------|--------|
| 1 | Access | S.11 | {yes/no} | Compliant/Gap |
| 2 | Correction & Erasure | S.12 | {yes/no} | Compliant/Gap |
| 3 | Grievance Redressal | S.13 | {yes/no} | Compliant/Gap |
| 4 | Nomination | S.14 | {yes/no} | Compliant/Gap |

## 5. Masking & Security Audit

| # | Data Element | Masking Required? | Masking Method | At Rest Encryption | In Transit Encryption | Status |
|---|-------------|-------------------|----------------|--------------------|-----------------------|--------|

## 6. Summary

| Status | Count |
|--------|-------|
| Compliant | {N} |
| Needs Review | {N} |
| Gap (Must Fix) | {N} |

**Penalty Exposure:** {estimated based on gap severity}

## 7. Required Actions

### Gaps (Must Fix Before Review)
1. **{Data Element} — DPDP S.{section} — {Requirement}**
   Gap: {description}
   Fix: {specific action to add to the spec}
   Penalty risk: {relevant penalty from Section 33}

### Needs Review (Discuss with Legal)
1. **{Data Element} — DPDP S.{section}**
   Question: {what needs clarification}

Rules

1. When in doubt, flag it — Classify uncertain data as personal data and flag for review
2. Linkable data is personal data — Data linkable to a specific person (even via session ID) is personal data under DPDP
3. Children = strictest requirements — Section 9 applies to all individuals under 18. No exceptions.
4. Analytics events are data — Event tracking creates personal data about user behavior. Include in audit.
5. Don't assume compliance — If a policy isn't explicitly stated in the spec, it's a gap
6. Consent must be granular — Bundled consent (buried in T&C) does not satisfy Section 6
7. Retention must be finite — "Account lifetime" is not acceptable without a defined account deletion policy

Anti-Patterns

• Don't skip the children's data audit — Section 9 penalties are up to Rs 200 crore
• Don't treat consent as a checkbox — DPDP requires free, specific, informed consent
• Don't assume "anonymized" data is exempt — verify the anonymization is irreversible
• Don't ignore Data Principal rights — access, correction, erasure, and grievance mechanisms are mandatory

Quality Checklist

• Every data element from the spec is inventoried
• Personal data classification applied to each element
• DPDP sections mapped per element
• Children's data audit completed (Section 9)
• Data Principal rights check completed (Sections 11-14)
• Consent mechanism verified (Section 6)
• Retention periods specified (Section 8(3))
• Security safeguards defined (Section 8(4))
• Masking and encryption audit completed
• Gaps have specific fix recommendations with penalty references