amharicstoryqa-eval
AmharicStoryQA: A Multicultural Story Question Answering Benchmark in Amharic — Azime et al. (2026) (arXiv:2602.02774, 2026)
What this evaluates
Evaluates long-sequence narrative understanding and cultural variation in Amharic using story-based question answering. Probes both multiple-choice and generative QA capabilities across different Ethiopian regional folktales.
Datasets
- AmharicStoryQA — total ?; splits: test (-1)
Metrics
accuracy(primary) — range: [0, 1]- Fraction of correctly answered questions. For multiple-choice tasks, the option appended to the prompt with the highest log-likelihood is selected as the prediction.
Input / output format
Input: Question prompt with candidate options appended for multiple-choice tasks; open-ended prompts for generative tasks.
Output: For MCQA: the selected option string. For generative: free-form text response.
Scoring recipe
def compute_accuracy(prompts, options, gold):
correct = 0
for p, opts, g in zip(prompts, options, gold):
ll = [log_likelihood(p + opt) for opt in opts]
pred = opts[argmax(ll)]
if pred == g: correct += 1
return correct / len(prompts)
Common pitfalls
- Option ordering bias heavily influences MCQA performance, especially in low-resource languages.
- Log-likelihood scoring for MCQA can be sensitive to prompt formatting and tokenization differences across models.
Evidence (verbatim from paper)
In multiple-choice each candidate option is appended to the corresponding question prompt, after which the log-likelihood is computed.Model accuracy is then reported based on the option with the highest log-likelihood score.
Citation
@misc{azime2026amharicstoryqa,
title={AmharicStoryQA: A Multicultural Story Question Answering Benchmark in Amharic},
author={Azime et al. (2026)},
year={2026},
note={arXiv:2602.02774}
}
- arXiv: 2602.02774