anetqa-eval
ANetQA: A Large-scale Benchmark for Fine-grained Compositional Reasoning over Untrimmed Videos — Zhou Yu et al. (2023) (arXiv:2305.02519, 2023)
What this evaluates
Evaluates fine-grained compositional reasoning over untrimmed videos by requiring models to interpret spatio-temporal scene graphs and answer complex questions involving attributes, actions, and temporal relationships.
Datasets
- ANetQA — total ?; splits: train (-1), val (-1), test (-1)
Metrics
accuracy(primary) — range: percent- Calculated as the percentage of correctly predicted answers out of the total number of questions. Per-type accuracies are also reported under four taxonomies: question structures, question semantics, reasoning skills, and answer types.
Input / output format
Input: Untrimmed video and a natural language question.
Output: A single predicted answer (binary choice, open-ended text, or one of four choices: [A], [B], both, or none).
Scoring recipe
correct = 0
total = 0
for pred, gold in zip(predictions, gold_answers):
if pred == gold:
correct += 1
total += 1
accuracy = (correct / total) * 100
Common pitfalls
- Models may over-rely on language priors rather than visual reasoning, though balancing strategies are used to mitigate this.
- Frame sampling strategy heavily impacts performance; insufficient or non-uniform sampling often misses critical temporal cues needed for fine-grained reasoning.
- Open-ended and attribute-oriented questions are significantly harder than binary/choice questions, leading to sharp accuracy drops.
Evidence (verbatim from paper)
Besides the overall accuracy, we follow [[9]] to report the per-type accuracies under different taxonomies, i.e., question structures, question semantics, reasoning skills, and answer types.
Citation
@misc{yu2023anetqa,
title={ANetQA: A Large-scale Benchmark for Fine-grained Compositional Reasoning over Untrimmed Videos},
author={Zhou Yu et al. (2023)},
year={2023},
note={arXiv:2305.02519}
}
- arXiv: 2305.02519