autopet2022-eval
Exploring Vanilla U-Net for Lesion Segmentation from Whole-body FDG-PET/CT Scans — Ye et al. (2022) (arXiv:2210.07490, 2022)
What this evaluates
Evaluates the capability of 3D medical image segmentation models to accurately delineate lesions in whole-body FDG-PET/CT scans. It probes the model's ability to handle high-resolution volumetric data and distinguish pathological regions from healthy tissue.
Datasets
- autoPET 2022 — total ?; splits: preliminary test (-1), final test (-1), validation (103)
Metrics
DSC(primary) — range: [0, 1]- Dice Similarity Coefficient: 2 * |A ∩ B| / (|A| + |B|), where A and B are the predicted and ground truth lesion masks.
FPV— range: other- False Positive Volume: number of voxels predicted as lesion but belonging to healthy tissue.
FNV— range: other- False Negative Volume: number of voxels belonging to the ground truth lesion but missed by the prediction.
Input / output format
Input: 3D volumetric FDG-PET/CT image patches (typically cropped to 192×192×192 during training) with original or resampled spacing.
Output: 3D binary segmentation mask indicating lesion voxels.
Scoring recipe
def compute_metrics(pred_mask, gt_mask):
intersection = np.sum(pred_mask & gt_mask)
union = np.sum(pred_mask) + np.sum(gt_mask)
dsc = 2 * intersection / union if union > 0 else 0.0
fpv = np.sum(pred_mask & ~gt_mask)
fnv = np.sum(~pred_mask & gt_mask)
return dsc, fpv, fnv
Common pitfalls
- DSC is insensitive to spatial localization errors when lesion volumes are small; FPV and FNV must be reported alongside it.
- Inference step size and crop dimensions heavily influence FPV/FNV trade-offs without significantly altering DSC scores.
- The challenge uses a hidden final test set; preliminary leaderboard rankings do not guarantee final placement due to different evaluation splits.
Evidence (verbatim from paper)
The vanilla U-Net outperforms other architectures for DSC and FPV on the preliminary test set.
Citation
@misc{ye2022exploring,
title={Exploring Vanilla U-Net for Lesion Segmentation from Whole-body FDG-PET/CT Scans},
author={Ye et al. (2022)},
year={2022},
note={arXiv:2210.07490}
}
- arXiv: 2210.07490