clinical-note-eval
Publicly Shareable Clinical Large Language Model Built on Synthetic Clinical Notes — Kweon et al. (2023) (arXiv:2309.00237, 2023)
What this evaluates
This evaluation probes the clinical reasoning, safety, and instruction-following capabilities of large language models on real-world medical datasets. It measures how well models generate accurate and appropriate responses to clinical prompts compared to baseline systems and GPT-3.5-turbo.
Datasets
- MIMIC-III — total 413; splits: test (413)
- MIMIC-IV — total 500; splits: test (500)
- i2b2 — total 619; splits: test (619)
- MTSamples — total 101; splits: test (101)
- CASI (AE) — total 100; splits: test (100)
- CASI (CR) — total 100; splits: test (100)
- DisCQ — total 100; splits: test (100)
Metrics
scores(primary) — range: [1, 5]- Average rating assigned by evaluators (GPT-4 and/or clinicians) on a 1–5 scale for each generated response. Higher scores indicate better clinical accuracy, safety, and helpfulness.
Input / output format
Input: Clinical instruction or case description paired with a reference answer (gold), used to prompt the model for a response.
Output: A natural language clinical response or answer generated by the model.
Scoring recipe
scores = []
for pred, gold in zip(predictions, golds):
rating = evaluator.evaluate(pred, gold) # 1-5 scale
scores.append(rating)
return sum(scores) / len(scores)
Common pitfalls
- Small test set sizes for several datasets (100–101 samples), which may lead to high variance in average scores.
- Reliance on LLM-as-a-judge (GPT-4) and limited human clinicians introduces potential bias and inconsistency in scoring criteria.
- Scores are reported per model size (7B, 13B, 175B) but not aggregated across sizes, making cross-architecture comparison difficult.
Evidence (verbatim from paper)
Table 2: Individual Experimental Results. Bolded entries denote the best scores, while underscored ones represent the second-best results for each model size.
Citation
@misc{kweon2023asclepius,
title={Publicly Shareable Clinical Large Language Model Built on Synthetic Clinical Notes},
author={Kweon et al. (2023)},
year={2023},
note={arXiv:2309.00237}
}
- arXiv: 2309.00237