cloudops-forecasting-eval
Pushing the Limits of Pre-training for Time Series Forecasting in the CloudOps Domain — Woo et al. (2023) (arXiv:2310.05063, 2023)
What this evaluates
Evaluates time series forecasting models, particularly pre-trained Transformers, on cloud operations data. It probes zero-shot generalization, architectural efficiency, and scaling behavior against classical and deep learning baselines.
Datasets
- azure2017 — total ?; splits: test (-1)
- borg2011 — total ?; splits: test (-1)
- ali2018 — total ?; splits: test (-1)
Metrics
sMAPE(primary) — range: percent- Symmetric Mean Absolute Percentage Error. Computed as the average of |y - ŷ| / ((|y| + |ŷ|)/2) over all time steps. Lower is better.
CRPS— range: other- Continuous Ranked Probability Score, measuring the accuracy of probabilistic forecasts against observed values. Lower is better.
Input / output format
Input: Time series context window of length L=480 containing target values and covariates.
Output: Probabilistic forecast distribution parameters (e.g., Student-T parameters) for the prediction horizon.
Scoring recipe
def compute_smape(y_true, y_pred):
diff = np.abs(y_true - y_pred)
scale = (np.abs(y_true) + np.abs(y_pred)) / 2
return np.mean(diff / scale) * 100
def compute_crps(y_true, dist_params):
# CRPS for Student-T distribution
return crps_student_t(y_true, dist_params)
Common pitfalls
- Fine-tuning pre-trained models often yields no benefit over zero-shot inference due to sufficient pre-training diversity.
- Date/time features are not critical for forecasting in this domain; RoPE positional encodings perform better.
- The naive forecast serves as a surprisingly strong baseline for high-frequency CloudOps data.
Evidence (verbatim from paper)
We observe that our zero-shot approach constitutes a very strong baseline, obtaining a 27/24% reduction in sMAPE/CRPS from the next best performing method on the largest dataset, azure2017, generally outperforming all other methods.
Citation
@misc{woo2023pushing,
title={Pushing the Limits of Pre-training for Time Series Forecasting in the CloudOps Domain},
author={Woo et al. (2023)},
year={2023},
note={arXiv:2310.05063}
}
- arXiv: 2310.05063