diamonds-eval
$\texttt{DIAMONDs}$: A Dataset for $\mathbb{D}$ynamic $\mathbb{I}$nformation $\mathbb{A}$nd $\mathbb{M}$ental modeling $\mathbb{O}$f $\mathbb{N}$umeric $\mathbb{D}$iscussions — Ghosh et al. (2025) (arXiv:2505.12651, 2025)
What this evaluates
Evaluates Theory of Mind and participant-centric reasoning in multi-party dialogues by testing a model's ability to track dynamic numerical variables, filter distractors, and reason from specific character perspectives (including false beliefs) rather than using omniscient context.
Datasets
- DIAMONDs — total ?; splits: test (-1); repo https://github.com/StonyBrookNLP/diamonds
Metrics
accuracy(primary) — range: percent- Percentage of correctly answered questions. Computed separately for omniscient, participant-centric, true belief, false belief, distractor, and unanswerable subsets.
Input / output format
Input: Multi-party conversational context containing dynamic numerical variables, knowledge asymmetries, and potential distractors, followed by a question that is either omniscient or participant-centric.
Output: A direct answer to the question (exact format not specified, evaluated as correct/incorrect).
Scoring recipe
correct = sum(1 for p, g in zip(predictions, golds) if p == g)
accuracy = (correct / len(golds)) * 100
# Computed separately for subsets: omniscient, participant-centric, true belief, false belief, distractor, unanswerable
Common pitfalls
- Models often fail to filter out irrelevant distractor information when answering participant-centric questions.
- Models struggle with false belief scenarios, frequently answering based on ground truth rather than the participant's outdated knowledge.
- Models exhibit a bias to generate an answer even when questions are underspecified and unanswerable.
Evidence (verbatim from paper)
Table 1: Omniscient is the % of correctly answered omniscient questions, Participant Centric is the % of correctly answered participant-centric ones, and Overall is the accuracy across all the question type.
Citation
@misc{ghosh2025diamonds,
title={$\texttt{DIAMONDs}$: A Dataset for $\mathbb{D}$ynamic $\mathbb{I}$nformation $\mathbb{A}$nd $\mathbb{M}$ental modeling $\mathbb{O}$f $\mathbb{N}$umeric $\mathbb{D}$iscussions},
author={Ghosh et al. (2025)},
year={2025},
note={arXiv:2505.12651}
}
- arXiv: 2505.12651