gaussianvlm-eval
GaussianVLM: Scene-centric 3D Vision-Language Models using Language-aligned Gaussian Splats for Embodied Reasoning and Beyond — Halacheva et al. (2025) (arXiv:2507.00886, 2025)
What this evaluates
Evaluates a 3D vision-language model's ability to perform object-centric and scene-centric reasoning tasks, including captioning, question answering, embodied planning, and dialogue. It probes spatial grounding, semantic abstraction, and robust generalization to out-of-domain real-world scene representations.
Datasets
- ScanRefer — total ?; splits: test (-1)
- ScanQA — total ?; splits: test (-1)
- Nr3D — total ?; splits: test (-1)
- SQA3D — total ?; splits: test (-1)
- 3D-LLM ScanNet subset — total ?; splits: test (-1)
- ScanNet++ (OOD object counting) — total 1000; splits: val (1000)
Metrics
CIDEr — range: percent
- Consensus-based Image Description Evaluation metric that weights n-grams by their IDF scores to penalize common words and reward distinctive phrases.
BLEU-4 — range: percent
- Precision-based metric computing the geometric mean of modified n-gram precisions up to order 4, with a brevity penalty.
METEOR — range: percent
- Metric that aligns predictions and references at word/phrase level, incorporating synonym matching, stemming, and exact matches to compute a harmonic mean of precision and recall.
ROUGE — range: percent
- Recall-Oriented Understudy for Gisting Evaluation; measures overlap of n-grams, longest common subsequence, or word sequences between prediction and reference.
Sentence-BERT similarity (Sim) — range: [0, 1]
- Computes cosine similarity between dense vector embeddings of the predicted and reference texts using a pre-trained Sentence-BERT model.
Exact-match accuracy (EM1) (primary) — range: percent
- Percentage of instances where the model's generated answer exactly matches the ground truth answer string.
Accuracy — range: percent
- Proportion of correctly answered questions, specifically used for the out-of-domain object counting task.
Input / output format
Input: 3D scene representation encoded as 40k randomly sampled Gaussian splats (or point clouds for baselines) paired with a natural language prompt or question.
Output: Free-form text generation (captions, answers, plans, or dialogue turns).
Scoring recipe
def compute_metrics(predictions, references):
scores = {}
scores['EM'] = sum(1 for p, r in zip(predictions, references) if p.strip() == r.strip()) / len(predictions)
scores['Accuracy'] = scores['EM']
scores['CIDEr'] = compute_cider(predictions, references)
scores['BLEU-4'] = compute_bleu(predictions, references, n=4)
scores['METEOR'] = compute_meteor(predictions, references)
scores['ROUGE'] = compute_rouge(predictions, references)
scores['Sim'] = compute_sbert_similarity(predictions, references)
return scores
Common pitfalls
- BLEU-4 and CIDEr are excluded for object-centric tasks because they reward superficial n-gram overlap and can assign misleadingly high scores to captions that describe context correctly but identify the wrong object.
- Exact-match accuracy is used for SQA3D and object counting, but semantic similarity metrics (Sentence-BERT, METEOR, ROUGE) are preferred for scene-centric tasks to capture paraphrasing and partial matches without penalizing valid alternative phrasings.
Evidence (verbatim from paper)
For scene-centric tasks, where captions and answers typically encompass diverse and richly descriptive content, we report standard metrics including CIDEr, BLEU-4, METEOR, ROUGE, exact-match accuracy, and Sentence-BERT similarity. For object-centric tasks, we exclude BLEU-4 and CIDEr. BLEU, a precision-based metric, and CIDEr are overly sensitive to superficial n-gram overlap, rendering them unsuitable for evaluating long-form object captions.
Citation
@misc{halacheva2025gaussianvlm,
title={GaussianVLM: Scene-centric 3D Vision-Language Models using Language-aligned Gaussian Splats for Embodied Reasoning and Beyond},
author={Halacheva et al. (2025)},
year={2025},
note={arXiv:2507.00886}
}
1---2name: gaussianvlm-eval3description: Evaluates a 3D vision-language model's ability to perform object-centric and scene-centric reasoning tasks, including captioning, question answering, embodied planning, and dialogue. It probes spatial grounding, semantic abstraction, and robust generalization to out-of-domain real-world scene representations. Use when the user wants to benchmark on ScanRefer, ScanQA, Nr3D, SQA3D, 3D-LLM ScanNet subset, ScanNet++ (OOD object counting), or asks about evaluating this task. Reports Exact-match accuracy (EM1).4---56# gaussianvlm-eval78> GaussianVLM: Scene-centric 3D Vision-Language Models using Language-aligned Gaussian Splats for Embodied Reasoning and Beyond — Halacheva et al. (2025) (arXiv:2507.00886, 2025)910## What this evaluates1112Evaluates a 3D vision-language model's ability to perform object-centric and scene-centric reasoning tasks, including captioning, question answering, embodied planning, and dialogue. It probes spatial grounding, semantic abstraction, and robust generalization to out-of-domain real-world scene representations.1314## Datasets1516- **ScanRefer** — total ?; splits: test (-1)17- **ScanQA** — total ?; splits: test (-1)18- **Nr3D** — total ?; splits: test (-1)19- **SQA3D** — total ?; splits: test (-1)20- **3D-LLM ScanNet subset** — total ?; splits: test (-1)21- **ScanNet++ (OOD object counting)** — total 1000; splits: val (1000)2223## Metrics2425- `CIDEr` — range: percent26 - Consensus-based Image Description Evaluation metric that weights n-grams by their IDF scores to penalize common words and reward distinctive phrases.27- `BLEU-4` — range: percent28 - Precision-based metric computing the geometric mean of modified n-gram precisions up to order 4, with a brevity penalty.29- `METEOR` — range: percent30 - Metric that aligns predictions and references at word/phrase level, incorporating synonym matching, stemming, and exact matches to compute a harmonic mean of precision and recall.31- `ROUGE` — range: percent32 - Recall-Oriented Understudy for Gisting Evaluation; measures overlap of n-grams, longest common subsequence, or word sequences between prediction and reference.33- `Sentence-BERT similarity (Sim)` — range: [0, 1]34 - Computes cosine similarity between dense vector embeddings of the predicted and reference texts using a pre-trained Sentence-BERT model.35- `Exact-match accuracy (EM1)` **(primary)** — range: percent36 - Percentage of instances where the model's generated answer exactly matches the ground truth answer string.37- `Accuracy` — range: percent38 - Proportion of correctly answered questions, specifically used for the out-of-domain object counting task.3940## Input / output format4142**Input**: 3D scene representation encoded as 40k randomly sampled Gaussian splats (or point clouds for baselines) paired with a natural language prompt or question.4344**Output**: Free-form text generation (captions, answers, plans, or dialogue turns).4546## Scoring recipe4748```python49def compute_metrics(predictions, references):50 scores = {}51 scores['EM'] = sum(1 for p, r in zip(predictions, references) if p.strip() == r.strip()) / len(predictions)52 scores['Accuracy'] = scores['EM']53 scores['CIDEr'] = compute_cider(predictions, references)54 scores['BLEU-4'] = compute_bleu(predictions, references, n=4)55 scores['METEOR'] = compute_meteor(predictions, references)56 scores['ROUGE'] = compute_rouge(predictions, references)57 scores['Sim'] = compute_sbert_similarity(predictions, references)58 return scores59```6061## Common pitfalls6263- BLEU-4 and CIDEr are excluded for object-centric tasks because they reward superficial n-gram overlap and can assign misleadingly high scores to captions that describe context correctly but identify the wrong object.64- Exact-match accuracy is used for SQA3D and object counting, but semantic similarity metrics (Sentence-BERT, METEOR, ROUGE) are preferred for scene-centric tasks to capture paraphrasing and partial matches without penalizing valid alternative phrasings.6566## Evidence (verbatim from paper)6768> For scene-centric tasks, where captions and answers typically encompass diverse and richly descriptive content, we report standard metrics including CIDEr, BLEU-4, METEOR, ROUGE, exact-match accuracy, and Sentence-BERT similarity. For object-centric tasks, we exclude BLEU-4 and CIDEr. BLEU, a precision-based metric, and CIDEr are overly sensitive to superficial n-gram overlap, rendering them unsuitable for evaluating long-form object captions.6970## Citation7172```bibtex73@misc{halacheva2025gaussianvlm,74 title={GaussianVLM: Scene-centric 3D Vision-Language Models using Language-aligned Gaussian Splats for Embodied Reasoning and Beyond},75 author={Halacheva et al. (2025)},76 year={2025},77 note={arXiv:2507.00886}78}79```8081- arXiv: 2507.00886