gmai-vl-eval
GMAI-VL & GMAI-VL-5.5M: A Large Vision-Language Model and A Comprehensive Multimodal Dataset Towards General Medical AI — Li et al. (2024) (arXiv:2411.14522, 2024)
What this evaluates
Evaluates a vision-language model's ability to understand and reason over diverse medical imaging modalities (CT, MRI, X-ray, pathology slides) to answer clinical questions, diagnose diseases, and perform anatomical or lesion recognition tasks.
Datasets
- PMCVQA — total ?; splits: test (-1)
- PathVQA — total ?; splits: test (-1)
- VQA-RAD — total ?; splits: test (-1)
- SLAKE — total ?; splits: test (-1)
- OmniMedVQA — total ?; splits: test (-1)
- GMAI-MMBench — total ?; splits: val (-1), test (-1)
- MMMU Health & Medicine track — total ?; splits: val (-1)
Metrics
accuracy (primary) — range: percent
- Percentage of correctly answered questions out of the total number of questions in the benchmark. Reported as an overall score and broken down by clinical sub-tasks (e.g., Modality Recognition, Disease Diagnosis).
Input / output format
Input: A medical image (e.g., X-ray, CT, MRI, fundus, or pathology slide) paired with a clinical or diagnostic question.
Output: A text answer or selected option corresponding to the question.
Scoring recipe
def compute_accuracy(predictions, gold_labels):
correct = sum(1 for pred, gold in zip(predictions, gold_labels) if normalize_answer(pred) == normalize_answer(gold))
return (correct / len(gold_labels)) * 100
Common pitfalls
- Data leakage must be strictly prevented by using only public test sets for evaluation and verifying image MD5 hashes against training data.
- Evaluation relies on VLMEvalKit with default settings; deviations in inference parameters or prompt formatting may cause non-reproducible results.
- Benchmarks report both overall accuracy and sub-task accuracies, which should be reported separately to match the paper's breakdown.
Evidence (verbatim from paper)
Overall, with an average accuracy of 88.48%, GMAI-VL surpasses models like HuatuoGPT-Vision-34B and InternVL2-40B, establishing itself as a leading model in multimodal medical image understanding and setting a new benchmark for medical VQA tasks.
Citation
@misc{li2024gmaivl,
title={GMAI-VL & GMAI-VL-5.5M: A Large Vision-Language Model and A Comprehensive Multimodal Dataset Towards General Medical AI},
author={Li et al. (2024)},
year={2024},
note={arXiv:2411.14522}
}
1---2name: gmai-vl-eval3description: Evaluates a vision-language model's ability to understand and reason over diverse medical imaging modalities (CT, MRI, X-ray, pathology slides) to answer clinical questions, diagnose diseases, and perform anatomical or lesion recognition tasks. Use when the user wants to benchmark on PMCVQA, PathVQA, VQA-RAD, SLAKE, OmniMedVQA, GMAI-MMBench, MMMU Health & Medicine track, or asks about evaluating this task. Reports accuracy.4---56# gmai-vl-eval78> GMAI-VL & GMAI-VL-5.5M: A Large Vision-Language Model and A Comprehensive Multimodal Dataset Towards General Medical AI — Li et al. (2024) (arXiv:2411.14522, 2024)910## What this evaluates1112Evaluates a vision-language model's ability to understand and reason over diverse medical imaging modalities (CT, MRI, X-ray, pathology slides) to answer clinical questions, diagnose diseases, and perform anatomical or lesion recognition tasks.1314## Datasets1516- **PMCVQA** — total ?; splits: test (-1)17- **PathVQA** — total ?; splits: test (-1)18- **VQA-RAD** — total ?; splits: test (-1)19- **SLAKE** — total ?; splits: test (-1)20- **OmniMedVQA** — total ?; splits: test (-1)21- **GMAI-MMBench** — total ?; splits: val (-1), test (-1)22- **MMMU Health & Medicine track** — total ?; splits: val (-1)2324## Metrics2526- `accuracy` **(primary)** — range: percent27 - Percentage of correctly answered questions out of the total number of questions in the benchmark. Reported as an overall score and broken down by clinical sub-tasks (e.g., Modality Recognition, Disease Diagnosis).2829## Input / output format3031**Input**: A medical image (e.g., X-ray, CT, MRI, fundus, or pathology slide) paired with a clinical or diagnostic question.3233**Output**: A text answer or selected option corresponding to the question.3435## Scoring recipe3637```python38def compute_accuracy(predictions, gold_labels):39 correct = sum(1 for pred, gold in zip(predictions, gold_labels) if normalize_answer(pred) == normalize_answer(gold))40 return (correct / len(gold_labels)) * 10041```4243## Common pitfalls4445- Data leakage must be strictly prevented by using only public test sets for evaluation and verifying image MD5 hashes against training data.46- Evaluation relies on VLMEvalKit with default settings; deviations in inference parameters or prompt formatting may cause non-reproducible results.47- Benchmarks report both overall accuracy and sub-task accuracies, which should be reported separately to match the paper's breakdown.4849## Evidence (verbatim from paper)5051> Overall, with an average accuracy of 88.48%, GMAI-VL surpasses models like HuatuoGPT-Vision-34B and InternVL2-40B, establishing itself as a leading model in multimodal medical image understanding and setting a new benchmark for medical VQA tasks.5253## Citation5455```bibtex56@misc{li2024gmaivl,57 title={GMAI-VL & GMAI-VL-5.5M: A Large Vision-Language Model and A Comprehensive Multimodal Dataset Towards General Medical AI},58 author={Li et al. (2024)},59 year={2024},60 note={arXiv:2411.14522}61}62```6364- arXiv: 2411.14522