infoseek-eval
Open Data Synthesis For Deep Research — Xia et al. (arXiv:2509.00375, 2025)
What this evaluates
Evaluates LLMs on complex, multi-step reasoning and agentic search tasks, including single-hop and multi-hop question answering as well as deep research benchmarks requiring web search and synthesis.
Datasets
- NQ — total ?; splits: test (-1)
- TQA — total ?; splits: test (-1)
- PopQA — total ?; splits: test (-1)
- HQA — total ?; splits: test (-1)
- 2Wiki — total ?; splits: test (-1)
- MSQ — total ?; splits: test (-1)
- Bamb — total ?; splits: test (-1)
- BrowseComp-Plus — total ?; splits: test (-1)
Metrics
Accuracy(primary) — range: percent- Percentage of instances where the model's final extracted answer matches the ground truth.
Search Calls— range: other- Average number of search engine invocations per task instance.
Input / output format
Input: Question or research task prompt requiring multi-step reasoning and web search.
Output: Model generates responses enclosed in specific tags: for reasoning, for queries, for retrieved summaries, and for the final response.
Scoring recipe
def compute_metrics(predictions, gold):
correct = 0
search_calls = 0
for pred, gold_ans in zip(predictions, gold):
extracted = extract_tag(pred, 'answer')
if exact_match(extracted, gold_ans):
correct += 1
search_calls += count_tag(pred, 'search')
return {'Accuracy': correct / len(predictions) * 100, 'Search Calls': search_calls / len(predictions)}
Common pitfalls
- Models must strictly follow the XML-like tag structure (, , ); failure to do so breaks answer extraction.
- High Accuracy does not imply efficient search usage; Search Calls are reported separately and can vary significantly across models.
- Benchmarks like BrowseComp-Plus involve noisy web results, where models often lose focus or hallucinate without proper intermediate summarization.
Evidence (verbatim from paper)
Table 4: Model performance on the BrowseComp-Plus benchmark for complex reasoning tasks.
| Model | Retriever | Accuracy (%) | Search Calls |
|---|---|---|---|
| InfoSeeker-3B | BM25 | $16.5$ | $8.24$ |
R = 1 if format and extracted answer are both correct, 0 otherwise
Citation
@misc{xia2025opendata,
title={Open Data Synthesis For Deep Research},
author={Xia et al.},
year={2025},
note={arXiv:2509.00375}
}
- arXiv: 2509.00375