kl-reduction
Data Selection for Language Models via Importance Resampling — Xie et al. (2023) (arXiv:2302.03169, 2023)
What this evaluates
Probes the statistical alignment between a candidate pretraining dataset and a target reference distribution (e.g., The Pile or Wikipedia/books). It quantifies how well the dataset's hashed n-gram frequencies match the desired language model pretraining distribution, serving as a proxy for downstream pretraining performance.
Datasets
- The Pile — total ?; splits: validation (-1)
- RealNews — total ?; splits: (unstated)
- S2ORC — total ?; splits: (unstated)
- Amazon reviews — total ?; splits: (unstated)
Metrics
KL reduction(primary) — range: other- Estimates the hashed n-gram distribution from the first 100k examples of a dataset by normalizing counts to an MLE distribution. Computes the KL divergence between this dataset distribution and a reference distribution (e.g., The Pile validation set or Wikipedia/books). The metric reports the reduction in divergence, indicating how closely the dataset matches the target pretraining distribution.
Input / output format
Input: Raw text documents from a candidate dataset (specifically the first 100,000 examples).
Output: A single scalar value representing the KL reduction score.
Scoring recipe
def compute_kl_reduction(dataset_samples, reference_dist):
# Extract first 100k examples
samples = dataset_samples[:100000]
# Compute hashed n-gram counts and normalize to MLE distribution
p_dataset = normalize(compute_hashed_ngrams(samples))
# Reference distribution (e.g., from Pile val or Wikipedia/books)
p_ref = reference_dist
# Compute KL divergence and return reduction metric
kl_div = kl_divergence(p_ref, p_dataset)
return 1.0 - kl_div # or raw KL depending on convention
Common pitfalls
- Using more or fewer than 100k examples for the n-gram distribution estimation, which changes the MLE estimate.
- Failing to normalize raw n-gram counts into a proper probability distribution before computing KL divergence.
- Using the wrong reference distribution (e.g., The Pile instead of Wikipedia/books) when evaluating RoBERTa pretraining.
Evidence (verbatim from paper)
To compute the KL reduction metric for a particular dataset, we took the first 100k examples from the dataset and computed the hashed n-gram counts. Normalizing these counts gives an MLE estimate of the hashed n-gram distribution for the dataset. We use the same procedure to compute the hashed n-gram distribution parameters for The Pile (from the Pile validation set).
Citation
@misc{xie2023data,
title={Data Selection for Language Models via Importance Resampling},
author={Xie et al. (2023)},
year={2023},
note={arXiv:2302.03169}
}
- arXiv: 2302.03169