kumorfm-2-eval
KumoRFM-2: Scaling Foundation Models for Relational Learning — Hudovernik et al. (2026) (arXiv:2604.12596, 2026)
What this evaluates
Evaluates the in-context learning capabilities of a relational foundation model on multi-table predictive tasks across diverse domains. It probes the model's ability to perform binary classification, multi-class classification, and regression directly on relational database structures without flattening or fine-tuning.
Datasets
- RelBenchV1 — total ?; splits: train (-1), val (-1), test (-1)
- RelBenchV2 — total ?; splits: train (-1), val (-1), test (-1)
- SALT — total ?; splits: train (-1), val (-1), test (-1)
- 4DBInfer — total ?; splits: train (-1), val (-1), test (-1)
Metrics
AUROC (primary) — range: [0, 1]
- Area Under the Receiver Operating Characteristic curve. Computed per binary classification task and averaged across tasks within each benchmark suite.
Accuracy / F1 / MAE — range: [0, 1] | percent | other
- Task-dependent metrics: accuracy or macro-F1 for multi-class classification, and mean absolute error for regression tasks. Averaged across tasks per suite.
Input / output format
Input: Multi-table relational database schema and data. Context examples from training and validation splits (up to 10k total) are provided for in-context learning, along with the target table/query for prediction.
Output: Predicted labels or regression values for the target entity/table row, obtained via in-context learning without fine-tuning.
Scoring recipe
def compute_auroc(y_true, y_pred):
fpr, tpr, _ = roc_curve(y_true, y_pred)
return auc(fpr, tpr)
def compute_suite_score(results):
return mean([compute_auroc(y_true, y_pred) for y_true, y_pred in results])
Common pitfalls
- Using only the training split for context instead of including validation splits when provided, as the protocol explicitly states to use both.
- Exceeding the 10k context example limit, which violates the defined realistic in-context learning setting.
- Fine-tuning the model, as the evaluation strictly mandates zero-shot/few-shot in-context learning on the base model without further training.
Evidence (verbatim from paper)
We assess the in-context learning capabilities of KumoRFM-2 on four different benchmark suites: RelBenchV1, RelBenchV2, SALT, and 4DBInfer. None of these datasets were used during pre-training, which guarantees no leakage of information. ... We use at most 10k context examples to reflect realistic settings and ensure fair comparison with prior work. ... Table 3: Test results on the binary classification tasks in RelBenchV1. Higher is better (AUROC).
Citation
@misc{hudovernik2026kumorfm2,
title={KumoRFM-2: Scaling Foundation Models for Relational Learning},
author={Hudovernik et al. (2026)},
year={2026},
note={arXiv:2604.12596}
}
1---2name: kumorfm-2-eval3description: Evaluates the in-context learning capabilities of a relational foundation model on multi-table predictive tasks across diverse domains. It probes the model's ability to perform binary classification, multi-class classification, and regression directly on relational database structures without flattening or fine-tuning. Use when the user wants to benchmark on RelBenchV1, RelBenchV2, SALT, 4DBInfer, or asks about evaluating this task. Reports AUROC.4---56# kumorfm-2-eval78> KumoRFM-2: Scaling Foundation Models for Relational Learning — Hudovernik et al. (2026) (arXiv:2604.12596, 2026)910## What this evaluates1112Evaluates the in-context learning capabilities of a relational foundation model on multi-table predictive tasks across diverse domains. It probes the model's ability to perform binary classification, multi-class classification, and regression directly on relational database structures without flattening or fine-tuning.1314## Datasets1516- **RelBenchV1** — total ?; splits: train (-1), val (-1), test (-1)17- **RelBenchV2** — total ?; splits: train (-1), val (-1), test (-1)18- **SALT** — total ?; splits: train (-1), val (-1), test (-1)19- **4DBInfer** — total ?; splits: train (-1), val (-1), test (-1)2021## Metrics2223- `AUROC` **(primary)** — range: [0, 1]24 - Area Under the Receiver Operating Characteristic curve. Computed per binary classification task and averaged across tasks within each benchmark suite.25- `Accuracy / F1 / MAE` — range: [0, 1] | percent | other26 - Task-dependent metrics: accuracy or macro-F1 for multi-class classification, and mean absolute error for regression tasks. Averaged across tasks per suite.2728## Input / output format2930**Input**: Multi-table relational database schema and data. Context examples from training and validation splits (up to 10k total) are provided for in-context learning, along with the target table/query for prediction.3132**Output**: Predicted labels or regression values for the target entity/table row, obtained via in-context learning without fine-tuning.3334## Scoring recipe3536```python37def compute_auroc(y_true, y_pred):38 fpr, tpr, _ = roc_curve(y_true, y_pred)39 return auc(fpr, tpr)4041def compute_suite_score(results):42 return mean([compute_auroc(y_true, y_pred) for y_true, y_pred in results])43```4445## Common pitfalls4647- Using only the training split for context instead of including validation splits when provided, as the protocol explicitly states to use both.48- Exceeding the 10k context example limit, which violates the defined realistic in-context learning setting.49- Fine-tuning the model, as the evaluation strictly mandates zero-shot/few-shot in-context learning on the base model without further training.5051## Evidence (verbatim from paper)5253> We assess the in-context learning capabilities of KumoRFM-2 on four different benchmark suites: RelBenchV1, RelBenchV2, SALT, and 4DBInfer. None of these datasets were used during pre-training, which guarantees no leakage of information. ... We use at most 10k context examples to reflect realistic settings and ensure fair comparison with prior work. ... Table 3: Test results on the binary classification tasks in RelBenchV1. Higher is better (AUROC).5455## Citation5657```bibtex58@misc{hudovernik2026kumorfm2,59 title={KumoRFM-2: Scaling Foundation Models for Relational Learning},60 author={Hudovernik et al. (2026)},61 year={2026},62 note={arXiv:2604.12596}63}64```6566- arXiv: 2604.12596