livefact-eval
LiveFact: A Dynamic, Time-Aware Benchmark for LLM-Driven Fake News Detection — Cheng Xu et al. (2026) (arXiv:2604.04815, 2026)
What this evaluates
Evaluates LLMs on fake news detection under dynamic, time-evolving evidence streams. It probes both binary classification capability (Real/Fake) and reasoning capability (handling ambiguity when evidence is incomplete), while explicitly measuring benchmark data contamination and epistemic humility.
Datasets
- LiveFact November 2025 dataset — total ?; splits: test (-1); repo https://github.com/bebxy/livefact
Metrics
average_score(primary) — range: percent- Average of Classification Accuracy and Inference Accuracy across the dataset.
reasoning_gap— range: percent- Inference Accuracy minus Classification Accuracy at temporal offset δ=-3.
Input / output format
Input: A news claim paired with a dynamic, time-stamped evidence stream, evaluated at specific temporal offsets (δ) relative to the claim's publication.
Output: A single label enclosed in double brackets, e.g., [[Real]], [[Fake]], or [[Ambiguous]].
Scoring recipe
def compute_accuracy(preds, gold):
correct = sum(1 for p, g in zip(preds, gold) if p == g)
return (correct / len(gold)) * 100
class_acc = compute_accuracy(class_preds, class_gold)
inf_acc = compute_accuracy(inf_preds, inf_gold)
average_score = (class_acc + inf_acc) / 2
reasoning_gap = inf_acc - class_acc
Common pitfalls
- Base models fail due to format non-compliance (not outputting [[LABEL]]), resulting in near-random parsed predictions rather than true reasoning failures.
- Reasoning-tuned models require extended output limits (1024 tokens) to generate Chain-of-Thought; truncating at 128 tokens yields near-zero accuracy despite strong underlying capabilities.
- Classification mode forces definitive verdicts even when evidence is absent, artificially penalizing models that should express uncertainty.
Evidence (verbatim from paper)
The Qwen3-235B-A22B-Instruct model not only leads the open-source sector but also outperforms proprietary flagship models, including gpt-5.1, achieving the highest average score of 72.40%.
Citation
@misc{xu2026livefact,
title={LiveFact: A Dynamic, Time-Aware Benchmark for LLM-Driven Fake News Detection},
author={Cheng Xu et al. (2026)},
year={2026},
note={arXiv:2604.04815}
}
- arXiv: 2604.04815