mm-upt-eval
First SFT, Second RL, Third UPT: Continual Improving Multi-Modal LLM Reasoning via Unsupervised Post-Training — Lai Wei et al. (2025) (arXiv:2505.22453, 2025)
What this evaluates
Evaluates the multi-modal mathematical reasoning capabilities of MLLMs on diverse visual math problems including geometry, charts, and tables. It tests the model's ability to solve multiple-choice and fill-in-the-blank questions using both human-created and synthetically generated unlabeled data.
Datasets
- MathVision — total ?; splits: test (-1)
- MathVerse — total ?; splits: test (-1)
- MathVista — total ?; splits: test (-1)
- We-Math — total ?; splits: test (-1)
Metrics
accuracy(primary) — range: percent- Percentage of correctly answered questions out of the total number of questions in the benchmark.
Input / output format
Input: Multi-modal mathematical reasoning problems containing images and text (geometry diagrams, charts, tables, multiple-choice, or fill-in-the-blank questions).
Output: Textual answer or solution to the mathematical problem.
Scoring recipe
def compute_accuracy(predictions, gold_answers):
correct = 0
for pred, gold in zip(predictions, gold_answers):
if normalize_answer(pred) == normalize_answer(gold):
correct += 1
return (correct / len(gold_answers)) * 100
Common pitfalls
- The paper evaluates on multiple benchmarks but reports average accuracy across them, which can mask per-benchmark performance variations.
- Training datasets (Geometry3K, GeoQA, MMR1) are used without ground-truth labels during unsupervised post-training, so evaluation relies on external benchmark labels not present during training.
- Synthetic data generation strategies (In-Context vs Direct) are compared, but the evaluation metric remains standard accuracy without checking for hallucination or factual correctness of generated questions.
Evidence (verbatim from paper)
We report accuracy (%) for each method on MathVision, MathVerse, MathVista, and We-Math.
Citation
@misc{wei2025mmupt,
title={First SFT, Second RL, Third UPT: Continual Improving Multi-Modal LLM Reasoning via Unsupervised Post-Training},
author={Lai Wei et al. (2025)},
year={2025},
note={arXiv:2505.22453}
}
- arXiv: 2505.22453