multimodal-vqa-eval
Train a Unified Multimodal Data Quality Classifier with Synthetic Data — Wang et al. (2025) (arXiv:2510.15162, 2025)
What this evaluates
Evaluates the zero-shot and few-shot visual question answering capabilities of multimodal large language models (MLLMs). It probes scene and spatial understanding, OCR capabilities, commonsense knowledge reasoning, and multimodal in-context learning across diverse benchmarks.
Datasets
- GQA — total ?; splits: test (-1)
- VQA-v2 — total ?; splits: test (-1)
- VizWiz — total ?; splits: test (-1)
- TextVQA — total ?; splits: test (-1)
- OKVQA — total ?; splits: test (-1)
- POPE — total ?; splits: test (-1)
- MMMU (Val) — total ?; splits: val (-1)
- MMBench (Dev) — total ?; splits: dev (-1)
- MMStar — total ?; splits: test (-1)
Metrics
accuracy(primary) — range: percent- Percentage of correctly answered questions. Computed as the mean score over 5 random seeds for demonstration example sampling in few-shot settings.
Input / output format
Input: Image(s) and text prompt (question or few-shot demonstrations + question).
Output: Text answer to the visual question.
Scoring recipe
def compute_accuracy(predictions, gold_answers):
correct = 0
for pred, gold in zip(predictions, gold_answers):
if normalize_answer(pred) == normalize_answer(gold):
correct += 1
return (correct / len(gold_answers)) * 100
Common pitfalls
- Few-shot results are averaged over 5 random seeds for demonstration sampling, not a single deterministic run.
- VQA-v2 scores may be inflated for baselines like DFN because MSCOCO (used to train DFN) overlaps with VQA-v2's source data.
- Zero-shot and few-shot evaluations measure different capabilities (direct reasoning vs. in-context learning), so they should not be directly compared without context.
Evidence (verbatim from paper)
Finally, the UniFilter induced MLLM achieves +0.7 and +2.8 average accuracy improvements over the DFN baseline on 4-shot and 8-shot in-context learning, respectively.
Citation
@misc{wang2025unifilter,
title={Train a Unified Multimodal Data Quality Classifier with Synthetic Data},
author={Wang et al. (2025)},
year={2025},
note={arXiv:2510.15162}
}
- arXiv: 2510.15162