open-asr-leaderboard-eval
Open ASR Leaderboard: Towards Reproducible and Transparent Multilingual Speech Recognition Evaluation — Srivastav et al. (2025) (arXiv:2510.06961, 2025)
What this evaluates
Evaluates multilingual speech recognition models on transcription accuracy and inference efficiency across short-form, long-form, and diverse language settings. It standardizes text normalization and reports both word error rate and inverse real-time factor to enable fair accuracy–efficiency comparisons.
Datasets
- Short-form English — total ?; splits: test (-1)
- Multilingual — total ?; splits: test (-1)
- Long-form — total ?; splits: test (-1)
Metrics
WER(primary) — range: percent- Word Error Rate: (Substitutions + Deletions + Insertions) / Total Reference Words. Standard ASR metric measuring transcription accuracy.
RTFx— range: other- Inverse Real-Time Factor: Audio Duration / Inference Time. Measures throughput efficiency (words processed per real-time second).
Input / output format
Input: Raw audio files (short-form, long-form, or multilingual recordings).
Output: Transcribed text string.
Scoring recipe
def compute_wer(predictions, references):
# Standard WER calculation over tokenized text
return wer_score(predictions, references) * 100
def compute_rtf(audio_durations, inference_times):
# RTFx = 1 / RT = audio_duration / inference_time
return audio_durations / inference_times
Common pitfalls
- Closed-source models cannot be fairly evaluated for RTFx due to upload latency and lack of GPU control.
- Improving English WER often degrades multilingual coverage due to training data specialization.
- SSL encoders paired with CTC decoders significantly underperform compared to Conformer+LLM architectures.
Evidence (verbatim from paper)
While the latter can achieve superior RTFx, this comes at the cost of accuracy: e.g., the best CTC-based model (NVIDIA Parakeet CTC 1.1B) ranks only 23rd in terms of WER.
Citation
@misc{srivastav2025openasr,
title={Open ASR Leaderboard: Towards Reproducible and Transparent Multilingual Speech Recognition Evaluation},
author={Srivastav et al. (2025)},
year={2025},
note={arXiv:2510.06961}
}
- arXiv: 2510.06961