pii-tagging-eval
MAC: Multi-Agent Constitution Learning — Thareja et al. (2026) (arXiv:2603.15968, 2026)
What this evaluates
Evaluates a model's ability to identify and extract private or sensitive information spans from text across legal, healthcare, and finance domains. It probes the model's capacity for fine-grained named entity recognition under limited labeled data and domain-specific privacy definitions.
Datasets
- ECHR — total 192; splits: train (160), val (16), test (16)
- MACCROBAT — total 192; splits: train (160), val (16), test (16)
- PUPA (Finance Subset) — total 192; splits: train (160), val (16), test (16)
Metrics
F1(primary) — range: percent- Computed via exact span-level matching between predicted and ground-truth private spans. Standard for PII/NER tasks.
Input / output format
Input: Raw text documents (case documents, clinical notes, or user-assistant interactions) from legal, healthcare, or finance domains.
Output: Predicted private information spans (start/end offsets or text spans) corresponding to fine-grained privacy types.
Scoring recipe
def compute_f1(predictions, gold):
pred_set = set(predictions)
gold_set = set(gold)
tp = len(pred_set & gold_set)
fp = len(pred_set - gold_set)
fn = len(gold_set - pred_set)
precision = tp / (tp + fp) if (tp + fp) > 0 else 0
recall = tp / (tp + fn) if (tp + fn) > 0 else 0
f1 = 2 * precision * recall / (precision + recall) if (precision + recall) > 0 else 0
return f1 * 100
Common pitfalls
- Exact span matching requires precise boundary alignment; off-by-one errors or differing tokenization can drastically reduce F1.
- The evaluation uses a fixed 192-document sample per domain to ensure consistency, which may not reflect full dataset performance.
- LLM-as-a-judge is used for agent-level analysis but not for the main benchmark metric, which relies strictly on exact span matching.
Evidence (verbatim from paper)
We report F1 computed via exact span-level matching between predicted and ground-truth private spans, which is the standard evaluation metric for this task (Sang and De Meulder, 2003).
Citation
@misc{thareja2026mac,
title={MAC: Multi-Agent Constitution Learning},
author={Thareja et al. (2026)},
year={2026},
note={arXiv:2603.15968}
}
- arXiv: 2603.15968