qsvm-fraud-detection-eval
Mixed Quantum-Classical Method For Fraud Detection with Quantum Feature Selection — Michele Grossi et al. (arXiv:2208.07963, 2022)
What this evaluates
Evaluates a quantum support vector machine (QSVM) with quantum feature selection for binary fraud detection on real-world card payment data. It probes the model's ability to identify fraudulent transactions using a balanced dataset and compares performance against classical feature selection baselines.
Datasets
- Real-world card payment data (Balanced Data Set) — total 2500; splits: train (1500), test (1000)
Metrics
Accuracy(primary) — range: [0, 1]- Fraction of correctly classified test instances out of the total test instances.
AUC— range: [0, 1]- Area under the Receiver Operating Characteristic curve, measuring the model's ability to distinguish between classes across all classification thresholds.
Input / output format
Input: Balanced card payment dataset features (e.g., F_15, F_42, etc.) with binary fraud labels.
Output: Binary class prediction (fraud vs. non-fraud) per transaction.
Scoring recipe
def compute_metrics(predictions, labels):
accuracy = sum(p == l for p, l in zip(predictions, labels)) / len(labels)
auc = roc_auc_score(labels, predictions)
return accuracy, auc
Common pitfalls
- The paper reports results averaged over 5 random trials in the text but 6 trials in Table 6, creating ambiguity in the exact repetition count.
- Performance is highly sensitive to the quantum backend simulation mode; noise models drastically reduce accuracy compared to ideal state-vector simulators.
- Feature selection is integral to the evaluation; swapping quantum-selected features for classical ones changes accuracy by ~0.02, so the protocol must specify the feature set used.
Evidence (verbatim from paper)
Due to data under-sampling, we have used 5 random trials to minimize bias. The average KPIs for accuracy and ACU are reported in the Table 6.
Citation
@misc{grossi2022mixed,
title={Mixed Quantum-Classical Method For Fraud Detection with Quantum Feature Selection},
author={Michele Grossi et al.},
year={2022},
note={arXiv:2208.07963}
}
- arXiv: 2208.07963