ukb-disease-risk-eval
Multimodal LLMs for health grounded in individual-specific data — Belyaeva et al. (2023) (arXiv:2307.09018, 2023)
What this evaluates
Evaluates the ability of multimodal LLMs to predict binary disease risk from individual-specific clinical data, including tabular features and time-series spirograms. It tests how well serialized text and cross-modal embeddings integrate to produce accurate risk scores for conditions like asthma and diabetes.
Datasets
- UK Biobank — total ?; splits: train (-1), val (-1)
Metrics
AUROC(primary) — range: [0, 1]- Area Under the Receiver Operating Characteristic curve, measuring the trade-off between true positive rate and false positive rate across classification thresholds.
AUPRC— range: [0, 1]- Area Under the Precision-Recall Curve, measuring performance on the positive class across classification thresholds.
Input / output format
Input: Serialized tabular data formatted as JSON-like key-value pairs combined with a base prompt (e.g., 'Predict if a patient has the condition or not. bmi: {val}. age: {val}.'). For multimodal HeLM, non-text modalities (spirograms, tabular) are projected into the LLM's token embedding space via modality-specific encoders and concatenated with text tokens.
Output: The model generates a completion. The evaluation computes the log-likelihood of the completion being “yes}” or “no}” to derive a risk score.
Scoring recipe
# Per instance
ll_yes = model.log_likelihood(prompt + "yes}")
ll_no = model.log_likelihood(prompt + "no}")
risk_score = ll_yes # or ll_yes - ll_no
# Aggregate across dataset
auroc = compute_auroc(risk_scores, true_labels)
auprc = compute_auprc(risk_scores, true_labels)
Common pitfalls
- Risk scores are derived from the log-likelihood of specific token completions ('yes}' or 'no}') rather than standard classification probabilities or logits.
- The evaluation is restricted to a European ancestry subset of UK Biobank, which may introduce population bias and limit cross-ancestry generalizability.
- Spirogram inputs are preprocessed into fixed-length 1D flow-volume curves, meaning the model does not evaluate raw time-series directly.
Evidence (verbatim from paper)
We then compute the log-likelihood of the sentence being completed with “yes}” or “no}”. This log-likelihood serves as a risk score and can be evaluated using metrics such as AUROC and AUPRC to assess discriminatory power.
Citation
@misc{belyaeva2023multimodal,
title={Multimodal LLMs for health grounded in individual-specific data},
author={Belyaeva et al. (2023)},
year={2023},
note={arXiv:2307.09018}
}
- arXiv: 2307.09018