wmt24-indic-mt-eval
NLIP_Lab-IITH Low-Resource MT System for WMT24 Indic MT Shared Task — Sahoo et al. (2024) (arXiv:2410.03215, 2024)
What this evaluates
Evaluates machine translation quality for low-resource Northeast Indian languages (Assamese, Khasi, Mizo, Manipuri) paired with English. It probes cross-lingual transfer capabilities, model adaptation under data scarcity, and the effectiveness of architectural constraints like layer freezing and script-based language grouping.
Datasets
- IndicNECorp1.0 — total ?; splits: dev (-1), test (-1)
Metrics
BLEU (primary) — range: percent
- Standard n-gram overlap metric. Computed using SacreBLEU v2.3.1 with mixed case, no tokenization (13a), exponential smoothing, and nrefs:1.
chrF — range: percent
- Character n-gram F-score metric. Computed with a character n-gram order of 2.
chrF++ — range: percent
- Extension of chrF that incorporates word n-grams alongside character n-grams to improve correlation with human judgment.
TER — range: percent
- Translation Edit Rate measuring the minimum number of edits (insertions, deletions, substitutions, shifts) required to transform the hypothesis into the reference.
RIBES — range: [0, 1]
- Rank-based Index evaluating translation quality based on rank correlation of n-gram matches, robust to word order variations.
COMET — range: [0, 1]
- Cross-lingual Evaluation Framework using a pre-trained multilingual model to predict human-like quality scores based on source, reference, and hypothesis.
Input / output format
Input: Source sentence in English or a Northeast Indian language (Assamese, Khasi, Mizo, Manipuri).
Output: Translated target sentence in the corresponding target language.
Scoring recipe
import sacrebleu
# predictions and gold are lists of strings
bleu = sacrebleu.corpus_bleu(
predictions, [gold],
tokenize='none', smooth_method='exp',
lowercase=False, force=False, lowercase_mixed=True,
use_effective_order=True
)
return bleu.score
Common pitfalls
- SacreBLEU tokenization and smoothing settings must exactly match the paper's signature (tok:13a, smooth:exp, case:mixed) to reproduce scores.
- chrF word order parameter defaults to 6 in many implementations, but the paper explicitly sets it to 2.
- COMET and RIBES scores are highly sensitive to the specific model checkpoint and preprocessing pipeline used; default HuggingFace pipelines may diverge from reported values.
Evidence (verbatim from paper)
We evaluate using BLEU Papineni et al. ([2002]), chrF Popović ([2015]), and chrF++ Popović ([2017]) metrics. We use the SacreBLEU toolkit Post ([2018]) to perform our evaluation777SacreBLEU signature: nrefs:1|case:mixed|eff:no|tok:13a|smooth:exp|version:2.3.1 with a chrF word order of 2. Additionally, as per the evaluation metrics used by the organizers, we report results on TER Snover et al. ([2006]), RIBES Isozaki et al. ([2010]), and COMET Rei et al. ([2022]) for our primary and contrastive submissions.
Citation
@misc{sahoo2024nliplabiith,
title={NLIP_Lab-IITH Low-Resource MT System for WMT24 Indic MT Shared Task},
author={Sahoo et al. (2024)},
year={2024},
note={arXiv:2410.03215}
}
1---2name: wmt24-indic-mt-eval3description: Evaluates machine translation quality for low-resource Northeast Indian languages (Assamese, Khasi, Mizo, Manipuri) paired with English. It probes cross-lingual transfer capabilities, model adaptation under data scarcity, and the effectiveness of architectural constraints like layer freezing and script-based language grouping. Use when the user wants to benchmark on IndicNECorp1.0, or asks about evaluating this task. Reports BLEU.4---56# wmt24-indic-mt-eval78> NLIP_Lab-IITH Low-Resource MT System for WMT24 Indic MT Shared Task — Sahoo et al. (2024) (arXiv:2410.03215, 2024)910## What this evaluates1112Evaluates machine translation quality for low-resource Northeast Indian languages (Assamese, Khasi, Mizo, Manipuri) paired with English. It probes cross-lingual transfer capabilities, model adaptation under data scarcity, and the effectiveness of architectural constraints like layer freezing and script-based language grouping.1314## Datasets1516- **IndicNECorp1.0** — total ?; splits: dev (-1), test (-1)1718## Metrics1920- `BLEU` **(primary)** — range: percent21 - Standard n-gram overlap metric. Computed using SacreBLEU v2.3.1 with mixed case, no tokenization (13a), exponential smoothing, and nrefs:1.22- `chrF` — range: percent23 - Character n-gram F-score metric. Computed with a character n-gram order of 2.24- `chrF++` — range: percent25 - Extension of chrF that incorporates word n-grams alongside character n-grams to improve correlation with human judgment.26- `TER` — range: percent27 - Translation Edit Rate measuring the minimum number of edits (insertions, deletions, substitutions, shifts) required to transform the hypothesis into the reference.28- `RIBES` — range: [0, 1]29 - Rank-based Index evaluating translation quality based on rank correlation of n-gram matches, robust to word order variations.30- `COMET` — range: [0, 1]31 - Cross-lingual Evaluation Framework using a pre-trained multilingual model to predict human-like quality scores based on source, reference, and hypothesis.3233## Input / output format3435**Input**: Source sentence in English or a Northeast Indian language (Assamese, Khasi, Mizo, Manipuri).3637**Output**: Translated target sentence in the corresponding target language.3839## Scoring recipe4041```python42import sacrebleu43# predictions and gold are lists of strings44bleu = sacrebleu.corpus_bleu(45 predictions, [gold],46 tokenize='none', smooth_method='exp',47 lowercase=False, force=False, lowercase_mixed=True,48 use_effective_order=True49)50return bleu.score51```5253## Common pitfalls5455- SacreBLEU tokenization and smoothing settings must exactly match the paper's signature (tok:13a, smooth:exp, case:mixed) to reproduce scores.56- chrF word order parameter defaults to 6 in many implementations, but the paper explicitly sets it to 2.57- COMET and RIBES scores are highly sensitive to the specific model checkpoint and preprocessing pipeline used; default HuggingFace pipelines may diverge from reported values.5859## Evidence (verbatim from paper)6061> We evaluate using BLEU Papineni et al. ([2002]), chrF Popović ([2015]), and chrF++ Popović ([2017]) metrics. We use the SacreBLEU toolkit Post ([2018]) to perform our evaluation777SacreBLEU signature: nrefs:1|case:mixed|eff:no|tok:13a|smooth:exp|version:2.3.1 with a chrF word order of 2. Additionally, as per the evaluation metrics used by the organizers, we report results on TER Snover et al. ([2006]), RIBES Isozaki et al. ([2010]), and COMET Rei et al. ([2022]) for our primary and contrastive submissions.6263## Citation6465```bibtex66@misc{sahoo2024nliplabiith,67 title={NLIP_Lab-IITH Low-Resource MT System for WMT24 Indic MT Shared Task},68 author={Sahoo et al. (2024)},69 year={2024},70 note={arXiv:2410.03215}71}72```7374- arXiv: 2410.03215