xtc-bench-eval
Beyond Accuracy: Benchmarking Cross-Task Consistency in Unified Multimodal Models — Wang et al. (2026) (arXiv:2604.25072, 2026)
What this evaluates
Evaluates cross-task semantic consistency in unified multimodal models by measuring how well generation and understanding tasks align on shared scene-graph facts. It probes whether architectural unification leads to representation-level coherence or merely independent task accuracy, specifically highlighting failures like consistent hallucination.
Datasets
- XTC-Bench — total ?; splits: test (-1)
Metrics
CCTA (primary) — range: [0, 1]
- Continuous Cross-Task Agreement (CCTA) measures the proportion of shared facts (objects, attributes, relations) between the generated image and the understood scene graph. It quantifies raw semantic alignment regardless of factual correctness.
AW-CCTA (primary) — range: [0, 1]
- Accuracy-Weighted CCTA (AW-CCTA) weights the raw CCTA score by the factual accuracy of both generation and understanding tasks. It penalizes consistent hallucination where both tasks agree but are incorrect.
Generation score (G) — range: [0, 1]
- Per-task performance evaluated on scene graph nodes, reporting OverallGen, MatchedNodes, and accuracy for attributes and relations.
Understanding score (U) — range: [0, 1]
- Per-task performance measured via scene graph-derived VQA, reporting OverallUnd, object retrieval, attribute queries, and relation queries.
Input / output format
Input: Scene graph descriptions used to generate prompts for image generation and VQA queries for understanding.
Output: Generated images and textual answers to VQA queries.
Scoring recipe
def compute_ccta(gen_facts, understand_facts):
shared = set(gen_facts) & set(understand_facts)
return len(shared) / max(len(gen_facts), 1)
def compute_aw_ccta(gen_facts, understand_facts, gold_facts):
gen_acc = sum(1 for f in gen_facts if f in gold_facts) / len(gen_facts)
und_acc = sum(1 for f in understand_facts if f in gold_facts) / len(understand_facts)
raw_ccta = compute_ccta(gen_facts, understand_facts)
return raw_ccta * gen_acc * und_acc
Common pitfalls
- Raw CCTA rewards consistent hallucination equally to consistent correctness, masking factual errors.
- Per-task accuracy (G and U) does not predict cross-task consistency, so evaluating them alone misses semantic misalignment.
- Matched-node evaluation converges for generation but not understanding, indicating relational comprehension is a persistent bottleneck.
Evidence (verbatim from paper)
We evaluate all models along three complementary dimensions: generation (G), understanding(U), and cross-task consistency (CCTA and AW-CCTA). First, cross-task inconsistency is observed universally: the strongest CCTA reaches only 0.706, and under AW-CCTA the best model achieves 0.623, demonstrating that semantic misalignment is a structural property not resolved by scale or architectural sophistication.
Citation
@misc{wang2026xtcbench,
title={Beyond Accuracy: Benchmarking Cross-Task Consistency in Unified Multimodal Models},
author={Wang et al. (2026)},
year={2026},
note={arXiv:2604.25072}
}
1---2name: xtc-bench-eval3description: Evaluates cross-task semantic consistency in unified multimodal models by measuring how well generation and understanding tasks align on shared scene-graph facts. It probes whether architectural unification leads to representation-level coherence or merely independent task accuracy, specifically highlighting failures like consistent hallucination. Use when the user wants to benchmark on XTC-Bench, or asks about evaluating this task. Reports CCTA, AW-CCTA.4---56# xtc-bench-eval78> Beyond Accuracy: Benchmarking Cross-Task Consistency in Unified Multimodal Models — Wang et al. (2026) (arXiv:2604.25072, 2026)910## What this evaluates1112Evaluates cross-task semantic consistency in unified multimodal models by measuring how well generation and understanding tasks align on shared scene-graph facts. It probes whether architectural unification leads to representation-level coherence or merely independent task accuracy, specifically highlighting failures like consistent hallucination.1314## Datasets1516- **XTC-Bench** — total ?; splits: test (-1)1718## Metrics1920- `CCTA` **(primary)** — range: [0, 1]21 - Continuous Cross-Task Agreement (CCTA) measures the proportion of shared facts (objects, attributes, relations) between the generated image and the understood scene graph. It quantifies raw semantic alignment regardless of factual correctness.22- `AW-CCTA` **(primary)** — range: [0, 1]23 - Accuracy-Weighted CCTA (AW-CCTA) weights the raw CCTA score by the factual accuracy of both generation and understanding tasks. It penalizes consistent hallucination where both tasks agree but are incorrect.24- `Generation score (G)` — range: [0, 1]25 - Per-task performance evaluated on scene graph nodes, reporting OverallGen, MatchedNodes, and accuracy for attributes and relations.26- `Understanding score (U)` — range: [0, 1]27 - Per-task performance measured via scene graph-derived VQA, reporting OverallUnd, object retrieval, attribute queries, and relation queries.2829## Input / output format3031**Input**: Scene graph descriptions used to generate prompts for image generation and VQA queries for understanding.3233**Output**: Generated images and textual answers to VQA queries.3435## Scoring recipe3637```python38def compute_ccta(gen_facts, understand_facts):39 shared = set(gen_facts) & set(understand_facts)40 return len(shared) / max(len(gen_facts), 1)4142def compute_aw_ccta(gen_facts, understand_facts, gold_facts):43 gen_acc = sum(1 for f in gen_facts if f in gold_facts) / len(gen_facts)44 und_acc = sum(1 for f in understand_facts if f in gold_facts) / len(understand_facts)45 raw_ccta = compute_ccta(gen_facts, understand_facts)46 return raw_ccta * gen_acc * und_acc47```4849## Common pitfalls5051- Raw CCTA rewards consistent hallucination equally to consistent correctness, masking factual errors.52- Per-task accuracy (G and U) does not predict cross-task consistency, so evaluating them alone misses semantic misalignment.53- Matched-node evaluation converges for generation but not understanding, indicating relational comprehension is a persistent bottleneck.5455## Evidence (verbatim from paper)5657> We evaluate all models along three complementary dimensions: generation (G), understanding(U), and cross-task consistency (CCTA and AW-CCTA). First, cross-task inconsistency is observed universally: the strongest CCTA reaches only 0.706, and under AW-CCTA the best model achieves 0.623, demonstrating that semantic misalignment is a structural property not resolved by scale or architectural sophistication.5859## Citation6061```bibtex62@misc{wang2026xtcbench,63 title={Beyond Accuracy: Benchmarking Cross-Task Consistency in Unified Multimodal Models},64 author={Wang et al. (2026)},65 year={2026},66 note={arXiv:2604.25072}67}68```6970- arXiv: 2604.25072