Security and Hardening
Overview
Security-first development practices for web applications. Treat every external input as hostile, every secret as sacred, and every authorization check as mandatory in production and production-like environments. Security isn't a phase — it's a constraint on every line of code that touches real user data, authentication, or external systems.
For coding-related work, load engineering-principles before this skill.
Security hardening specializes its validation-at-boundaries and fail-fast
defaults for adversarial inputs and production guardrails.
Use strict security defaults for production. Apply the same defaults to staging when it is public, handles production-like data, connects to shared services, or validates production behavior. Local development may use lighter settings when they are isolated, explicit, and cannot accidentally ship as deployed defaults.
Overrides
These are default rules, not immutable law. Explicit user instructions, project policy, or feature-specific design docs may override this guidance, such as allowing secret logging in DEBUG mode or showing stack traces in production. When an override exists, follow it deliberately, keep it scoped to the stated context, and avoid expanding it to unrelated code.
When to Use
- Building anything that accepts user input
- Implementing authentication or authorization
- Storing or transmitting sensitive data
- Integrating with external APIs or services
- Adding file uploads, webhooks, or callbacks
- Handling payment or PII data
Environment Scope
- Production: Apply the full checklist and fail closed.
- Production-like staging: Apply production rules when staging is public, uses real or sensitive data, shares production-adjacent services, or tests auth/security behavior.
- Local development: Relaxed settings are acceptable when limited to local/dev mode, such as disabled CORS, HTTP instead of HTTPS, relaxed CSP,
secure: falsecookies on localhost, verbose internal errors, mocked auth, or fake external services. - Dev exceptions: Make them obvious in code/config, gate them on explicit environment checks, and ensure production/staging defaults remain secure.
- Still default-forbidden in dev: Unless a specific override says otherwise, do not commit secrets, use real sensitive data casually, log credentials/tokens, build SQL with string concatenation, or use unsafe HTML/script execution with untrusted input.
The Three-Tier Boundary System
Always Do In Production And Production-Like Staging
- Validate all external input at the system boundary (API routes, form handlers)
- Parameterize all database queries — never concatenate user input into SQL
- Encode output to prevent XSS (use framework auto-escaping, don't bypass it)
- Use HTTPS for all external communication
- Hash passwords with bcrypt/scrypt/argon2 (never store plaintext)
- Set security headers (CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options)
- Use httpOnly, secure, sameSite cookies for sessions
- Run
npm audit(or equivalent) before every release
In local development, prefer the same patterns when practical, but allow lighter configuration if it improves iteration and is clearly prevented from reaching production.
Approve First For Production Or Shared Staging
- Adding new authentication flows or changing auth logic
- Storing new categories of sensitive data (PII, payment info)
- Adding new external service integrations
- Changing CORS configuration
- Adding file upload handlers
- Modifying rate limiting or throttling
- Granting elevated permissions or roles
Default Never Do In Any Environment
Unless explicitly overridden by the user, project policy, or a feature-specific design doc:
- Never commit secrets to version control (API keys, passwords, tokens)
- Never log sensitive data (passwords, tokens, full credit card numbers)
- Never trust client-side validation as a security boundary
- Never disable security headers in production or production-like staging
- Never use
eval()orinnerHTMLwith user-provided data
OWASP Top 10 Prevention
1. Injection (SQL, NoSQL, OS Command)
// BAD: SQL injection via string concatenation
const query = `SELECT * FROM users WHERE id = '${userId}'`;
// GOOD: Parameterized query
const user = await db.query('SELECT * FROM users WHERE id = $1', [userId]);
// GOOD: ORM with parameterized input
const user = await prisma.user.findUnique({ where: { id: userId } });
2. Broken Authentication
// Password hashing
import { hash, compare } from 'bcrypt';
const SALT_ROUNDS = 12;
const hashedPassword = await hash(plaintext, SALT_ROUNDS);
const isValid = await compare(plaintext, hashedPassword);
// Session management — assumes config.environment and config.sessionSecret
// have been parsed and validated at startup from the project-selected
// runtime schema validator.
const isLocalDev = config.environment === 'development';
app.use(session({
secret: config.sessionSecret, // From validated config, not raw process.env
resave: false,
saveUninitialized: false,
cookie: {
httpOnly: true, // Not accessible via JavaScript
secure: !isLocalDev, // HTTPS only outside local dev
sameSite: 'lax', // CSRF protection
maxAge: 24 * 60 * 60 * 1000, // 24 hours
},
}));
3. Cross-Site Scripting (XSS)
// BAD: Rendering user input as HTML
element.innerHTML = userInput;
// GOOD: Use framework auto-escaping (React does this by default)
return <div>{userInput}</div>;
// If you MUST render HTML, sanitize first
import DOMPurify from 'dompurify';
const clean = DOMPurify.sanitize(userInput);
4. Broken Access Control
// Always check authorization, not just authentication
app.patch('/api/tasks/:id', authenticate, async (req, res) => {
const task = await taskService.findById(req.params.id);
// Check that the authenticated user owns this resource
if (task.ownerId !== req.user.id) {
return res.status(403).json({
error: { code: 'FORBIDDEN', message: 'Not authorized to modify this task' }
});
}
// Proceed with update
const updated = await taskService.update(req.params.id, req.body);
return res.json(updated);
});
5. Security Misconfiguration
// Security headers (use helmet for Express)
import helmet from 'helmet';
app.use(helmet());
// Content Security Policy
app.use(helmet.contentSecurityPolicy({
directives: {
defaultSrc: ["'self'"],
scriptSrc: ["'self'"],
styleSrc: ["'self'", "'unsafe-inline'"], // Tighten for production if possible
imgSrc: ["'self'", 'data:', 'https:'],
connectSrc: ["'self'"],
},
}));
// CORS — restrict to known origins in deployed environments.
// Local dev may use a permissive origin if explicitly gated to dev mode.
app.use(cors({
origin: process.env.ALLOWED_ORIGINS?.split(',') || 'http://localhost:3000',
credentials: true,
}));
6. Sensitive Data Exposure
// Never return sensitive fields in API responses
function sanitizeUser(user: UserRecord): PublicUser {
const { passwordHash, resetToken, ...publicFields } = user;
return publicFields;
}
// Use environment variables for secrets
const API_KEY = process.env.STRIPE_API_KEY;
if (!API_KEY) throw new Error('STRIPE_API_KEY not configured');
Input Validation Patterns
Schema Validation at Boundaries
This example uses Zod. Use the project-selected runtime schema validator (e.g., Zod, Valibot) while preserving equivalent validation and error handling.
import { z } from 'zod';
const CreateTaskSchema = z.object({
title: z.string().min(1).max(200).trim(),
description: z.string().max(2000).optional(),
priority: z.enum(['low', 'medium', 'high']).default('medium'),
dueDate: z.string().datetime().optional(),
});
// Validate at the route handler
app.post('/api/tasks', async (req, res) => {
const result = CreateTaskSchema.safeParse(req.body);
if (!result.success) {
return res.status(422).json({
error: {
code: 'VALIDATION_ERROR',
message: 'Invalid input',
details: result.error.flatten(),
},
});
}
// result.data is now typed and validated
const task = await taskService.create(result.data);
return res.status(201).json(task);
});
File Upload Safety
// Restrict file types and sizes
const ALLOWED_TYPES = ['image/jpeg', 'image/png', 'image/webp'];
const MAX_SIZE = 5 * 1024 * 1024; // 5MB
function validateUpload(file: UploadedFile) {
if (!ALLOWED_TYPES.includes(file.mimetype)) {
throw new ValidationError('File type not allowed');
}
if (file.size > MAX_SIZE) {
throw new ValidationError('File too large (max 5MB)');
}
// Don't trust the file extension — check magic bytes if critical
}
Triaging npm audit Results
Not all audit findings require immediate action. Use this decision tree:
npm audit reports a vulnerability
├── Severity: critical or high
│ ├── Is the vulnerable code reachable in your app?
│ │ ├── YES --> Fix immediately (update, patch, or replace the dependency)
│ │ └── NO (dev-only dep, unused code path) --> Fix soon, but not a blocker
│ └── Is a fix available?
│ ├── YES --> Update to the patched version
│ └── NO --> Check for workarounds, consider replacing the dependency, or add to allowlist with a review date
├── Severity: moderate
│ ├── Reachable in production? --> Fix in the next release cycle
│ └── Dev-only? --> Fix when convenient, track in backlog
└── Severity: low
└── Track and fix during regular dependency updates
Key questions:
- Is the vulnerable function actually called in your code path?
- Is the dependency a runtime dependency or dev-only?
- Is the vulnerability exploitable given your deployment context (e.g., a server-side vulnerability in a client-only app)?
When you defer a fix, document the reason and set a review date.
Rate Limiting
import rateLimit from 'express-rate-limit';
// General API rate limit
app.use('/api/', rateLimit({
windowMs: 15 * 60 * 1000, // 15 minutes
max: 100, // 100 requests per window
standardHeaders: true,
legacyHeaders: false,
}));
// Stricter limit for auth endpoints
app.use('/api/auth/', rateLimit({
windowMs: 15 * 60 * 1000,
max: 10, // 10 attempts per 15 minutes
}));
Secrets Management
.env files:
├── .env.example → Committed (template with placeholder values)
├── .env → NOT committed (contains real secrets)
└── .env.local → NOT committed (local overrides)
.gitignore must include:
.env
.env.local
.env.*.local
*.pem
*.key
Always check before committing:
# Check for accidentally staged secrets
git diff --cached | grep -i "password\|secret\|api_key\|token"
Security Review Checklist
### Authentication
- [ ] Passwords hashed with bcrypt/scrypt/argon2 (salt rounds ≥ 12)
- [ ] Session tokens are httpOnly, secure, sameSite
- [ ] Login has rate limiting
- [ ] Password reset tokens expire
### Authorization
- [ ] Every endpoint checks user permissions
- [ ] Users can only access their own resources
- [ ] Admin actions require admin role verification
### Input
- [ ] All user input validated at the boundary
- [ ] SQL queries are parameterized
- [ ] HTML output is encoded/escaped
### Data
- [ ] No secrets in code or version control
- [ ] Sensitive fields excluded from API responses
- [ ] PII encrypted at rest (if applicable)
### Infrastructure
- [ ] Security headers configured for production/staging (CSP, HSTS, etc.)
- [ ] CORS restricted to known origins outside local dev
- [ ] Dependencies audited for vulnerabilities
- [ ] Error messages don't expose internals outside local dev
See Also
For detailed security checklists and pre-commit verification steps, see references/security-checklist.md.
Common Rationalizations
| Rationalization | Reality |
|---|---|
| "This is an internal tool, security doesn't matter" | Internal tools get compromised. Attackers target the weakest link. |
| "We'll add security later" | Security retrofitting is 10x harder than building it in. Add it now. |
| "No one would try to exploit this" | Automated scanners will find it. Security by obscurity is not security. |
| "The framework handles security" | Frameworks provide tools, not guarantees. You still need to use them correctly. |
| "It's just a prototype" | Prototypes become production. Keep relaxed settings visibly local-only and easy to tighten. |
Red Flags
- User input passed directly to database queries, shell commands, or HTML rendering
- Secrets in source code or commit history
- API endpoints without authentication or authorization checks
- Missing CORS configuration or wildcard (
*) origins in deployed environments - No rate limiting on authentication endpoints
- Stack traces or internal errors exposed to users
- Dependencies with known critical vulnerabilities
Verification
After implementing security-relevant production or staging code:
-
npm auditshows no critical or high vulnerabilities - No secrets in source code or git history
- All user input validated at system boundaries
- Authentication and authorization checked on every protected endpoint
- Security headers present in deployed responses (check with browser DevTools)
- Error responses don't expose internal details outside local dev
- Rate limiting active on auth endpoints outside local dev