racurry Test Permission-Trigger Hooks
mr-sparkle's block_unneeded_permission_triggers.sh (PreToolUse) blocks 7 Bash patterns that it claims trigger Claude Code permission prompts, so Claude rewrites instead of making the user re-approve. bash_guidance.sh (SessionStart) preaches the same list. The open question: do those patterns actually trigger a prompt under the current permission setup? If not, the hook is pure friction (it blocked ~6 legitimate read-only commands in one review session).
This is a two-phase test — the phase boundary is the user toggling the mr-sparkle plugin.
The 7 patterns and their test commands
Each command is safe/no-op and isolates one pattern against an otherwise-allowed base command (so any Phase-2 prompt is due to the pattern, not the base command).
| # | Pattern | Test command |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | $() command substitution |
echo "$(echo subst)" |
| 2 | Backtick substitution | echo " + backtick + echo subst + backtick + " |
| 3 | echo/printf with --- string |
echo "--- divider ---" |
| 4 | git -C <path> |
git -C . status --short |
| 5 | Fully-qualified cwd path | ls <absolute path to this repo>/docs |
| 6 | Brace + quote (JSON) | echo '{"test":1}' |
| 7 | Output redirection | echo redirect-test > ./.tmp/perm-test.txt |
Phase 1 — hooks ON (mr-sparkle enabled)
Run each of the 7 commands. Expected: block_unneeded_permission_triggers.sh intercepts each (exit 2) with a "…triggers a permission prompt" message — the command never runs. Record blocked vs. ran for each. This confirms the hook is active and what it catches.
Phase 2 — hooks OFF
Ask the user to disable the mr-sparkle plugin AND restart the session, then run the same 7 commands again. Disabling the plugin does not unload its hooks from a running session — hooks are registered at session start, so without a restart the blocking hook keeps firing and Phase 2 is invalid (observed 2026-06-14). After the restart the blocking hook is gone, so the raw Claude Code permission system decides. For each command, record:
- Prompted — the user got a permission prompt (approve/deny), OR
- Ran clean — it executed with no prompt.
(The user watches for prompts — they're the one who'd be interrupted.)
Decision rule
Per pattern:
- Prompted without the hook → the hook prevents a real interruption → keep it for that pattern.
- Ran clean without the hook → the hook was blocking a harmless command for no benefit → drop/narrow that pattern.
If every pattern runs clean without the hook, the whole prophylactic layer (block_unneeded_permission_triggers.sh + bash_guidance.sh) is friction-only → remove both. If some prompt, narrow the hook to just those.
Report
Produce a table: pattern → Phase 1 (blocked?) → Phase 2 (prompted / clean) → verdict (keep / drop).
Cleanup
rm ./.tmp/perm-test.txt(created by pattern 7 if it ran in Phase 2).- Tell the user to re-enable mr-sparkle (disabling it also turns off the dangerous-command and lint-on-write hooks).