ralvarezdev Skill Builder
Meta-skill that scaffolds new skills under skills/<category>/<skill-name>/ following SPECS.md. Generates structure; hands off content authoring. Templates and the full validation checklist live in RECIPES.md.
1. When to invoke
- User says "let's create a new skill", "scaffold a skill", "I want to add a
<topic>-architect", or invokes/skill-builder. - User wants to verify whether an existing folder structure matches the conventions.
- User wants to move / rename a skill and needs the SPECS updates handled correctly.
2. Source of truth
SPECS.md is canonical. This skill cites and applies the rules; it does not redefine them. Sections it enforces:
- Skill Authoring Guide — SKILL.md format, STACK.md format, naming convention, description quality, supporting files (
UPPER_SNAKE_CASE.md). - Repository & Folder Structure — discovery rule (folder with
SKILL.mdis terminal; nested SKILL.md forbidden), category placement, personal-skills path-segment rule. - Which Skills Need a
STACK.md— heuristic table by parent folder; per-skill exceptions allowed. - Bundle & Skill Catalog — bundle membership decisions.
If a question isn't answered here, read SPECS.md before guessing.
3. Interview-first protocol
Never scaffold without an interview. Ask in order; wait for each answer:
- Topic + suffix — what does the skill enforce? Confirm the resulting
<name>matches the SPECS naming convention. Suffix table in RECIPES §5. - Category — which parent folder? Use existing folders as the source of valid categories. If the right category doesn't exist, ask whether to add it (SPECS update required).
- Version target — if the category requires
STACK.md(per SPECS heuristic), what versions? For meta-skills with no library stack, confirm exemption (RECIPES §8). - Bundle membership — which bundle(s) include this skill, or is it standalone?
- Cross-skill ties — which other skills should this one reference? These become
../<path>/SKILL.mdlinks. - Attribution — is this adapted from an external source (e.g.
mattpocock/skills)? - Body shape preview — propose 5–12 section headings based on the topic. Confirm before writing the skeleton.
- Decisions list (if any) — when the skill encodes opinionated defaults, surface them before generating the body.
4. Naming + placement
Validate against the SPECS naming convention (RECIPES §5). Path follows category placement and the discovery rule: skills/<category>/<name>/SKILL.md. Never nest a SKILL.md inside another skill folder.
If the topic doesn't fit any suffix, propose a new one and update SPECS — don't shoehorn.
5. Frontmatter generation
One-line description in YAML scalar form. The description sits in Claude's always-loaded skill index — every line costs tokens on every turn, forever.
- WHAT first (topics, comma-separated). WHEN last (trigger phrases / commands).
- Version-sensitive skills mention the primary version target inline.
- Drop "Enforces strict", "Comprehensive guide to", and similar filler.
- One line; no
>or|block scalars.
Template + good/bad examples in RECIPES §1.
6. Body skeleton
Generate placeholders, not content. Body discipline (per SPECS — SKILL.md Format):
- Rules first, code second. Each section explains the rule and the why; code is illustrative, not exhaustive.
- Code block ceiling: ~15 lines. If it grows larger or appears as a full reference implementation (Dockerfile, auth middleware, project tree, test scaffold), move it to
RECIPES.mdand link with one line: "Skeleton in RECIPES.md." - Don't restate patterns canonically explained elsewhere — link.
- Target body size: under ~10 KB / ~250 lines unless the topic is genuinely dense.
Standard section shape in RECIPES §2.
When to scaffold a RECIPES.md
Create at scaffold time when the skill will plausibly contain:
- Multiple full reference implementations (Dockerfile, middleware, repo layout, test scaffold).
- A canonical "here's how the full pattern looks in " section.
- Multiple sibling examples (Go + Python, several frameworks).
Skip when the skill is conceptual (catalog skills like design-patterns, methodology skills like tdd). For those, code snippets stay inline because they illustrate, not implement.
If unsure, write the skill first; factor recipes out when body crosses ~10 KB or a single section's code exceeds half its prose.
7. STACK.md — when and how
Check the SPECS "Which Skills Need a STACK.md" table keyed on parent folder. If yes (or "Depends" with version-sensitive content), generate per RECIPES §3. Exemption rules in RECIPES §8.
Fetching versions: for Go libs, https://proxy.golang.org/<module>/@latest. For Python, https://pypi.org/pypi/<package>/json. For tools, gh api repos/<owner>/<name>/releases/latest. Always pin actual versions, never latest.
8. Cross-skill linking
Use relative paths from the new skill to its peers (e.g. ../../languages/go-architect/SKILL.md). Standard ties by category in RECIPES §4.
9. SPECS.md updates (atomic)
Every new skill requires 4–6 edits to SPECS.md, applied in one pass. Full list in RECIPES §6.
Verify after editing: grep SPECS for the skill name; every mention should make sense in context. Check that no 📋 planned row remains for a skill that now exists.
10. Attribution
If adapted from an external source (e.g. Matt Pocock, Anthropic example, community pattern), append the attribution footer (RECIPES §9). Verbatim copies require strict attribution; significantly evolved skills should still credit the origin idea.
11. Validation
Before declaring scaffold done, walk the full checklist in RECIPES §7. If any item fails, fix before handing off.
12. Hand-off
The scaffold is ready. Content authoring is the next step:
- Each section heading needs its bullets / paragraphs / illustrative snippets.
- Each architectural opinion needs to be stated explicitly (default + alternative + when-to-switch).
- Each
STACK.mdrow needs a real pinned version (fetch live — don't guess). - Long code recipes go in
RECIPES.md, not inSKILL.md. As content lands, audit any code block past ~15 lines and factor it out.
Surface the scaffold to the user, summarise what was generated and where, and ask: "Want me to fill in the section content now, or would you prefer to author it yourself?"