Grok Build Orchestration
When to Use
- Use when delegating a well-specified implementation task to xAI's Grok Build CLI running headlessly
- Use when executing a Markdown implementation plan task-by-task with a diff review after each task
- Use when the user says "use grok", "grok build", "have grok implement", or "send to grok"
The coding assistant is the orchestrator: it plans, writes self-contained task specs,
dispatches them to Grok Build headlessly, reviews every diff, and owns the final result.
Grok is the fast, cheap executor. Full CLI details and verified behaviors: references/cli.md.
Safety Gate
Before every dispatch, show the user the exact task specification that will be sent to xAI,
the target worktree, and the permission mode. Obtain explicit approval to disclose that text
and to let Grok edit the scoped worktree. Never include secrets, proprietary source, customer
data, or credentials in a task specification. Do not run grok update, --always-approve,
or a destructive recovery command without separate, explicit approval.
When to delegate vs keep with the orchestrator
| Delegate to Grok |
Keep with the orchestrator |
| Plan tasks with clear acceptance criteria |
Ambiguous requirements, architecture decisions |
| Boilerplate, scaffolding, CRUD |
Deep cross-file debugging |
| Mechanical refactors |
Security-sensitive code |
| Test writing from clear specs |
Anything touching production infrastructure |
| UI components from mockups/specs |
Tasks where writing the spec ≈ doing the work |
When in doubt, keep it with the orchestrator.
Session preflight (once, before the first dispatch)
grok update --check --json — if updateAvailable is true, tell the user. Run
grok update only after explicit approval, then confirm with grok --version.
grok models — if it errors or reports logged out, STOP and ask the user to run
grok login.
Per-task loop (sequential — the default)
Spec. Write a self-contained task file (template below) to a temp directory
OUTSIDE the target repo — the harness scratchpad if one is available, else the OS
temp dir. Never write it inside the target repo. Grok has zero conversation context:
no one-liner prompts, ever.
- POSIX:
mkdir -p "${TMPDIR:-/tmp}/grok-specs", then write task.md there.
- Windows (PowerShell):
New-Item -ItemType Directory -Force "$env:TEMP\grok-specs",
then write task.md there.
Clean state. No uncommitted source changes — commit or stash first, so the
post-run diff is exactly Grok's work. Ignore build artifacts (__pycache__, dist/,
etc.); if they show in git status, they're usually just un-gitignored, not your
concern. Never dispatch on a dirty source tree.
Dispatch.
POSIX:
grok --prompt-file <task-file> \
--output-format json \
--always-approve \
--max-turns 30 \
--cwd <repo>
Windows (PowerShell) — backtick line-continuation:
grok --prompt-file <task-file> `
--output-format json `
--always-approve `
--max-turns 30 `
--cwd <repo>
Parse the JSON output and save sessionId. (--always-approve is required for
headless runs — --permission-mode acceptEdits silently cancels edits with no
interactive approver. Use it only after the user explicitly approves Grok editing this
exact scoped worktree. See references/cli.md.) For a high-stakes task, add --check
so Grok self-verifies before you review; skip it otherwise (it ~doubles latency).
Review gate — non-negotiable.
- Read the diff yourself (
git diff -- <files from the spec> to skip artifact noise):
does it do the task, only the task, and match repo conventions?
- Run the acceptance commands from the spec.
- Pass → commit with a clear message following the repo's convention → next task.
- Fail → ask the user before a fix-up or any reset. Never run
git checkout -- . or
git clean -fd automatically; preserve the diff for review and use a non-destructive
recovery plan unless the user explicitly authorizes otherwise.
Task spec template
# Task: <one-line title>
## Context
- Repo: <path> — <one line on what the project is>
- Conventions: <test runner, formatter, a good example file to imitate>
## Files
- Modify: <path>
- Create: <path>
## Task
<precise description of the change>
## Constraints
- Do not modify any files other than those listed above.
- <other constraints>
## Acceptance criteria
- `<exact command>` <expected result>
Executing a Markdown implementation plan
- One plan task per dispatch, in order.
- Check off the plan's task checkboxes (
- [ ] → - [x]) as each task lands and passes
the review gate.
- If the plan explicitly marks tasks as independent, see Parallel dispatch below;
otherwise stay sequential.
Parallel dispatch (opt-in exception, not the default)
Only when a plan exp
1---2name: grok-build3description: Delegate well-specified implementation tasks to xAI's Grok Build CLI running headlessly while the orchestrating agent plans, writes task specs, reviews every diff, and owns the result.4---567# Grok Build Orchestration89## When to Use1011- Use when delegating a well-specified implementation task to xAI's Grok Build CLI running headlessly12- Use when executing a Markdown implementation plan task-by-task with a diff review after each task13- Use when the user says "use grok", "grok build", "have grok implement", or "send to grok"1415The coding assistant is the orchestrator: it plans, writes self-contained task specs,16dispatches them to Grok Build headlessly, reviews every diff, and owns the final result.17Grok is the fast, cheap executor. Full CLI details and verified behaviors: `references/cli.md`.1819## Safety Gate2021Before every dispatch, show the user the exact task specification that will be sent to xAI,22the target worktree, and the permission mode. Obtain explicit approval to disclose that text23and to let Grok edit the scoped worktree. Never include secrets, proprietary source, customer24data, or credentials in a task specification. Do not run `grok update`, `--always-approve`,25or a destructive recovery command without separate, explicit approval.2627## When to delegate vs keep with the orchestrator2829| Delegate to Grok | Keep with the orchestrator |30|---|---|31| Plan tasks with clear acceptance criteria | Ambiguous requirements, architecture decisions |32| Boilerplate, scaffolding, CRUD | Deep cross-file debugging |33| Mechanical refactors | Security-sensitive code |34| Test writing from clear specs | Anything touching production infrastructure |35| UI components from mockups/specs | Tasks where writing the spec ≈ doing the work |3637When in doubt, keep it with the orchestrator.3839## Session preflight (once, before the first dispatch)40411. `grok update --check --json` — if `updateAvailable` is true, tell the user. Run42 `grok update` only after explicit approval, then confirm with `grok --version`.432. `grok models` — if it errors or reports logged out, STOP and ask the user to run44 `grok login`.4546## Per-task loop (sequential — the default)47481. **Spec.** Write a self-contained task file (template below) to a temp directory49 OUTSIDE the target repo — the harness scratchpad if one is available, else the OS50 temp dir. Never write it inside the target repo. Grok has zero conversation context:51 no one-liner prompts, ever.52 - POSIX: `mkdir -p "${TMPDIR:-/tmp}/grok-specs"`, then write `task.md` there.53 - Windows (PowerShell): `New-Item -ItemType Directory -Force "$env:TEMP\grok-specs"`,54 then write `task.md` there.552. **Clean state.** No uncommitted *source* changes — commit or stash first, so the56 post-run diff is exactly Grok's work. Ignore build artifacts (`__pycache__`, `dist/`,57 etc.); if they show in `git status`, they're usually just un-gitignored, not your58 concern. Never dispatch on a dirty source tree.593. **Dispatch.**6061 POSIX:6263 ```bash64 grok --prompt-file <task-file> \65 --output-format json \66 --always-approve \67 --max-turns 30 \68 --cwd <repo>69 ```7071 Windows (PowerShell) — backtick line-continuation:7273 ```powershell74 grok --prompt-file <task-file> `75 --output-format json `76 --always-approve `77 --max-turns 30 `78 --cwd <repo>79 ```8081 Parse the JSON output and save `sessionId`. (`--always-approve` is required for82 headless runs — `--permission-mode acceptEdits` silently cancels edits with no83 interactive approver. Use it only after the user explicitly approves Grok editing this84 exact scoped worktree. See `references/cli.md`.) For a high-stakes task, add `--check`85 so Grok self-verifies before you review; skip it otherwise (it ~doubles latency).864. **Review gate — non-negotiable.**87 - Read the diff yourself (`git diff -- <files from the spec>` to skip artifact noise):88 does it do the task, only the task, and match repo conventions?89 - Run the acceptance commands from the spec.90 - **Pass** → commit with a clear message following the repo's convention → next task.91 - **Fail** → ask the user before a fix-up or any reset. Never run `git checkout -- .` or92 `git clean -fd` automatically; preserve the diff for review and use a non-destructive93 recovery plan unless the user explicitly authorizes otherwise.9495## Task spec template9697```markdown98# Task: <one-line title>99100## Context101- Repo: <path> — <one line on what the project is>102- Conventions: <test runner, formatter, a good example file to imitate>103104## Files105- Modify: <path>106- Create: <path>107108## Task109<precise description of the change>110111## Constraints112- Do not modify any files other than those listed above.113- <other constraints>114115## Acceptance criteria116- `<exact command>` <expected result>117```118119## Executing a Markdown implementation plan120121- One plan task per dispatch, in order.122- Check off the plan's task checkboxes (`- [ ]` → `- [x]`) as each task lands and passes123 the review gate.124- If the plan explicitly marks tasks as independent, see Parallel dispatch below;125 otherwise stay sequential.126127## Parallel dispatch (opt-in exception, not the default)128129Only when a plan exp