X Undocumented API

X Undocumented API

Overview

Use this skill for X.com's frontend web API: GraphQL operations under https://x.com/i/api/graphql, supporting REST-like web endpoints under https://x.com/i/api, and the browser headers/cookies those calls require.

First Rules

• Verify operation names and query IDs against the current X web bundle; query IDs rotate.
• Treat operationName as the durable conceptual endpoint, and queryId as rotating bundle metadata.
• Never print raw cookies, auth_token, ct0, bearer tokens, proxy credentials, or full upstream payloads.
• Generate x-client-transaction-id from the current X web page/bundle material and the exact request method/path.
• Do not test mutations against live accounts unless the user explicitly asks for that mutation and understands the effect.
• Keep endpoint evidence with exact dates, operation IDs, variables, feature flags, response paths, account/access scope, and result counts.
• Separate upstream variables from local caller filters. A runtime or CLI itemFilter can be an application-side filter rather than a proven GraphQL variable.

Reference Map

Read only what the task needs:

• runtime-and-auth.md: browser auth, cookies, bearer tokens, CSRF, transaction IDs, headers, guest tokens, and error classes.
• graphql-discovery.md: extracting operation names, query IDs, feature flags, field toggles, and endpoint inventories from X web bundles.
• endpoint-patterns.md: request/response shapes for SearchTimeline, user/list/follower/tweet timelines, timeline instructions, and search operators.
• community-timelines.md: X Communities operations, variables, ranking modes, response paths, and community-search caveats.
• cursor-behavior.md: X timeline cursor semantics, pagination risks, fan-out caveats, and evidence standards.
• reply-visibility-research.md: high-fidelity notes from the 2026-05 reply visibility investigation, including observed failure modes, experiments, current best thinking, and next discriminators.

Reusable script:

• scripts/extract-x-graphql-endpoints.ts: fetch current X web bundles and save a JSON/CSV operation inventory.

Investigation Workflow

1. Clarify whether the user needs an API explanation, a current endpoint inventory, a request shape, or a live read-only probe.
2. Extract or inspect the current X web bundle before relying on query IDs, variables, features, or response paths.
3. For unknown GraphQL operations, locate nearby bundle code for variable names, feature flags, field toggles, and response normalization paths.
4. For author-corpus work, compare native timeline operations against SearchTimeline author queries and record lane yield per page, not just total pages.
5. For live read probes, use secret-safe output: status code, top-level keys, response path presence, item counts, cursor presence, and example public IDs only.
6. For pagination behavior, record request cursor, returned cursors, item IDs in order, item count, first/last sort index, endpoint, variables, and observed time.
7. Save dated findings outside the skill unless the user explicitly asks to update this skill.

GraphQL Request Shape

X web GraphQL paths have this form:

https://x.com/i/api/graphql/<queryId>/<operationName>?variables=<json>&features=<json>

Some operations also use fieldToggles=<json>.

Authenticated reads commonly need these headers:

authorization: Bearer <X web bearer token>
x-csrf-token: <ct0>
cookie: ct0=<ct0>; auth_token=<auth_token>
x-client-transaction-id: <generated for method + full path>
x-twitter-active-user: yes
x-twitter-auth-type: OAuth2Session
x-twitter-client-language: en
origin: https://x.com
referer: https://x.com/

The transaction ID path must include the query ID:

/i/api/graphql/<queryId>/<operationName>

Diagnostics

Current High-Value Facts

• SearchTimeline uses rawQuery, product, count, optional cursor, and promoted-content controls.
• SearchTimeline author queries can outperform native user timelines for corpus collection. In live xpool probes on 2026-06-18, from:<handle> -filter:replies -filter:retweets and from:<handle> filter:replies reached 100 lane items in 5 pages for sampled accounts where native timeline crawls hit only 39-47 items after 20 pages.
• Search author-query cursors appear risky across account rotation. In live xpool profile-sample probes, later-page SearchTimeline continuations under rotating accounts produced concentrated 404 / timeout / network failures; pinning one account per lane materially reduced that failure mix, though it did not remove empty-page degeneration.
• Native list recency is ListLatestTweetsTimeline, not SearchTimeline list:<id>.
• Native community posts are CommunityTweetsTimeline, not a SearchTimeline community operator.
• Direct messages are now "X Chat": end-to-end-encrypted, PIN-gated, and sent over WebSocket (wss://chat-ws.x.com/ws?token=<JWT>), not a GraphQL/REST mutation. Legacy DM mutations (useSendMessageMutation, REST dm/new2.json) are gone from current bundles. See the 2026-06-18 notes below.
• UserTweetsAndReplies local itemFilter handling is not proof of an upstream GraphQL variable. In the 2026-06-18 bundle scan, itemFilter, authored_posts, and authored_replies strings were absent from the current client-web bundle.
• UserTweets can include repost surfaces; do not treat it as pure authored root-post history without checking surface kind or local filters. In 2026-06-18 live xpool probes, native UserTweets recovered materially more root-post items than author-search for some post-light accounts (64 vs 20, 100 vs 74, 22 vs 2 in early comparisons, later 22 vs 2, 1 vs 1, and 18 vs 0 on three more post-light accounts), so a post lane may need native-timeline preference even when reply lanes stay on search.
• Low-yield native post cursor_loop is often a corpus-shape signal, not a pure transport failure. In one fresh xpool worker slice, low-yield post loops split into two buckets: sparse accounts where replies also stopped early (average lifetime tweet count about 200) and reply-heavy accounts where replies still reached target (average lifetime tweet count about 4300 while root-post yield stayed near 7).
• In a larger hybrid-worker slice after the posts=UserTweets / replies=SearchTimeline rollout (1,534 samples since the 2026-06-18T21:39:50Z boot), reply lanes were dominated by target_items_reached and source_exhausted, while posts still split across target_items_reached, max_pages_reached, and cursor_loop. Treat that as evidence for a hybrid endpoint choice, not a single universally best authored-corpus endpoint.
• A short runner_terminated burst immediately after a PM2 restart can be rollover noise from in-flight work rather than a steady-state cursor signal. In the same 2026-06-18 investigation, all fresh runner_terminated reply-lane rows landed within about one second, 44-45 seconds after restart, with none afterward.
• TimelineTimelineCursor entries commonly carry Top and Bottom cursor values.
• count is not always honored by timeline operations; observe returned item counts. Current live author-search probes emitted about 20 items/page even when higher counts were requested.

2026-06-18 Direct Messages / X Chat E2E Notes

These notes came from a live investigation (logged-in managed sessions via a CDP-backed browser tool, with WebSocket frame capture). Treat them as the current DM reality, superseding any older "send a DM via GraphQL" assumption.

• Legacy DM mutations are gone. useSendMessageMutation (query id MaxK2PKX1F9Z-9SwqwavTw in the 2023-era twitter-api-client registry) and the REST fallback dm/new2.json are absent from every current X web bundle chunk. Do not reuse them; they will not work.
• X has replaced DMs with "X Chat": end-to-end-encrypted and PIN-gated. Rolled out from Nov 2025 ("X Chat replacing DMs for some X users"). Authenticated /messages redirects to /i/chat/pin/new until the account is provisioned.
• Send is a WebSocket frame, not an HTTP mutation. The send rides wss://chat-ws.x.com/ws?token=<JWT>. HTTP GraphQL/REST capture during a real send observed zero send calls. There is no send operationName to extract — bundle extraction can never surface a DM send query id, by design, not by capture gap.
• PIN derives encryption keys client-side. Provisioning the passcode generated no server request carrying the PIN; keys are produced locally from it. A fresh browser context (no local key material) is redirected to /i/chat/pin/recovery and must re-enter the PIN to re-derive keys before any read or send. Cookie-only / headless sessions are therefore insufficient for X Chat without PIN re-entry.
• DM-adjacent HTTP mutations that DO remain in current bundles: dmBlockUser (IYw9u1KEhrS-t-BXsau4Uw), dmUnblockUser (Krbs6Nak_o7liWQwfV1jOQ), DmNsfwMediaFilterUpdate (of_N6O33zfyD4qsFJMYFxA), ConversationControlChange (57WYJNnWH0vM3Ip_gm8B2g), ConversationControlDelete (OoMO_aSZ1ZXjegeamF9QmA). These are block/unblock/control, not send.
• Capture tooling caveats: CDP Network.enable does not capture POST bodies unless max_post_data_size is set; and WebSocket frames need dedicated WebSocketCreated / WebSocketFrameSent / WebSocketFrameReceived handlers — request handlers never see them. A CDP tool without WS handlers is blind to X Chat.
• Reachability: accounts that have never followed / accepted a message request from each other cannot exchange DMs — recipient search at /i/chat compose returns only the sender, and a typed message becomes a self-chat ("You: ") the other account never receives.

2026-05-20 Reply Publish Visibility Notes

These notes came from a live, user-approved xpool reply probe plus current X web bundle inspection. Treat query IDs as dated facts and regenerate before reusing.

• Current observed CreateTweet query ID was 5CdvsV_zjv4L64XFifAglw; current observed TweetDetail query ID was oCon7R-cgWRFy6EfZjaKfg.
• A patched direct GraphQL reply send used POST /i/api/graphql/5CdvsV_zjv4L64XFifAglw/CreateTweet, returned HTTP 200, had no top-level GraphQL errors, and returned data.create_tweet.tweet_results.
• Useful mutation evidence, without secrets: method, path, operation name, query ID, transaction-id state, HTTP status, content type, GraphQL error presence, response path, ct0 rotation boolean, rate-limit headers, body key names, created public tweet ID, parent tweet ID, and verifier result.
• For replies, native-like variables include tweet_text, media, semantic_annotation_ids, and reply.in_reply_to_tweet_id with exclude_reply_user_ids.
• Current web metadata includes fieldToggles on CreateTweet; include the current toggles when the bundle advertises them.
• Native engagement_request is conditional, not universal. X web emitted it only when composer/source state had promoted/impression content with both disclosure_type and impression_id; missing it is a source-context gap for impression-backed targets, not proof every direct reply is non-native.
• TweetDetail parent-thread visibility can lag or paginate. In the live probe, the created reply was initially behind a ShowMoreThreads cursor in rankingMode=Relevance, then appeared on page 1 a few minutes later.
• SearchTimeline can be a false negative for newly created replies. In the live probe, the reply was visible through parent TweetDetail Relevance, while SearchTimeline missed it by both conversation_id:<parent_id> and exact-text search.
• Do not use SearchTimeline presence as the source of truth for reply visibility. It is a discoverability/indexing signal only.
• First-party hidden replies are a separate surface. Check ModeratedTimeline for the parent before labeling a reply hidden; in the live probe it returned a valid empty hidden-replies timeline while parent TweetDetail showed the reply.
• Visibility verification should be a vector, not one boolean: direct lookup visible, author replies visible with cursor depth, parent TweetDetail seen with ranking mode/page/cursor, search discoverable, ModeratedTimeline present/absent, policy wrapper/tombstone/limited-action state.
• Later native-browser, real-Google-Chrome, and graph-connected xpool experiments are summarized in reply-visibility-research.md. The short version: accepted replies can be direct-visible to other viewers while absent from those viewers' parent TweetDetail; a one-way poster-follows-parent-author edge did not clear that threshold in the sampled runs.