reaperinvest Risk Assessment
When to Use This Skill
Use this skill when you need to:
- Identify and score business risks by likelihood and impact
- Create mitigation strategies for high-priority risks
- Build a risk monitoring plan with early warning indicators
- Prepare for a new venture, product launch, or major business change
DO NOT use this skill for financial risk modeling, insurance assessments, or cybersecurity threat analysis. This is for general business risk identification and planning.
Core Principle
RISK MANAGEMENT IS NOT ABOUT ELIMINATING RISK — IT IS ABOUT KNOWING WHICH RISKS ARE WORTH TAKING AND HAVING A PLAN FOR THE ONES THAT COULD KILL YOUR BUSINESS.
Phase 1: Identify
Surface all relevant risks before scoring them.
Required Inputs
| Input | What to Ask | Default |
|---|---|---|
| Business context | "Describe your business and current stage." | No default |
| Assessment trigger | "Why now? (new venture, annual review, specific concern)" | Annual review |
| Revenue model | "How do you make money? (services, products, subscriptions)" | No default |
| Dependencies | "What does your business depend on most? (key clients, platforms, suppliers)" | No default |
| Known risks | "What risks are already on your radar?" | No default |
Risk Categories
Walk through each category to ensure comprehensive coverage:
- Financial: Cash flow, revenue concentration, pricing, debt
- Operational: Key person dependency, tool failures, process breakdowns
- Market: Competition, demand shifts, economic conditions
- Legal/Compliance: Contracts, regulations, IP, liability
- Reputational: Brand damage, negative reviews, public relations
- Technology: Platform dependency, data loss, security
## Risk Register
| # | Risk | Category | Description |
|---|------|----------|-------------|
| R1 | [Risk name] | [Category] | [What could happen and how] |
| R2 | [Risk name] | [Category] | [What could happen and how] |
GATE: Confirm the risk register is complete before scoring.
Phase 2: Score
Assess each risk using likelihood and impact scoring.
Scoring Matrix
Rate each risk 1-5 on both dimensions:
| Score | Likelihood | Impact |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Rare (less than 5% chance) | Negligible (minor inconvenience) |
| 2 | Unlikely (5-20%) | Minor (temporary disruption) |
| 3 | Possible (20-50%) | Moderate (significant effort to recover) |
| 4 | Likely (50-80%) | Major (serious financial or operational damage) |
| 5 | Almost certain (80%+) | Catastrophic (business survival threatened) |
## Risk Scoring
| # | Risk | Likelihood | Impact | Risk Score | Priority |
|---|------|-----------|--------|-----------|----------|
| R1 | [Name] | [1-5] | [1-5] | [L x I] | [Critical/High/Medium/Low] |
**Priority thresholds:**
- Critical: 15-25 — Immediate action required
- High: 10-14 — Mitigation plan needed within 30 days
- Medium: 5-9 — Monitor and prepare contingency
- Low: 1-4 — Accept and review quarterly
Risk Heat Map
Present a visual summary:
Impact →
1 2 3 4 5
5 | M | H | C | C | C |
L 4 | M | H | H | C | C |
i 3 | L | M | H | H | C |
k 2 | L | L | M | H | H |
e 1 | L | L | L | M | M |
GATE: Review scored risks before building mitigation plans.
Phase 3: Mitigate
Create action plans for high and critical risks.
Mitigation Strategy Template
For each critical and high-priority risk:
## Mitigation Plan: [Risk Name]
**Risk score:** [X] (Likelihood [X] x Impact [X])
**Risk owner:** [Name]
**Prevention (reduce likelihood):**
- [Action to prevent the risk from occurring]
- [Action]
**Preparation (reduce impact):**
- [Action to minimize damage if it occurs]
- [Action]
**Response (if it happens):**
1. [Immediate action]
2. [Short-term recovery step]
3. [Long-term recovery step]
**Early warning indicators:**
- [Sign that this risk is becoming more likely]
- [Metric to monitor]
**Review frequency:** [Monthly / Quarterly]
Common Solopreneur Mitigations
| Risk | Common Mitigation |
|---|---|
| Revenue concentration (1-2 big clients) | Diversify: no client should exceed 30% of revenue |
| Key person dependency | Document processes, cross-train, build a contractor bench |
| Platform dependency | Maintain email list, diversify channels, export data regularly |
| Cash flow gaps | Maintain 3-month operating reserve, invoice promptly |
Phase 4: Monitor
Set up ongoing risk monitoring.
Risk Dashboard
## Risk Dashboard — [Quarter/Year]
| Risk | Score | Status | Last Reviewed | Next Review | Owner |
|------|-------|--------|--------------|-------------|-------|
| [Name] | [X] | Stable / Increasing / Decreasing | [Date] | [Date] | [Name] |
Review Cadence
- Monthly: Review critical and high risks — any changes in likelihood or impact?
- Quarterly: Full risk register review — add new risks, retire resolved ones, re-score
- After any incident: Update the affected risk's score and mitigation plan
Risk Appetite Statement
Help the user define their risk tolerance:
**Our risk appetite:**
- We ACCEPT risks scored 1-4 (Low) without active mitigation
- We MITIGATE risks scored 5-14 (Medium-High) with documented plans
- We AVOID or TRANSFER risks scored 15-25 (Critical) — these threaten business survival
Anti-Patterns
- Ignoring low-probability, high-impact risks — "It will never happen" is not a strategy. Plan for catastrophic risks even if unlikely.
- Risk register as a one-time exercise — risks change constantly. A static register is a false sense of security.
- No risk owner — unowned risks are unmanaged risks. Every risk needs one accountable person.
- Mitigation without monitoring — you cannot know if mitigation is working without tracking indicators.
- Analysis paralysis — do not score 50 risks. Focus on the top 10-15 that matter most.
Recovery
- User cannot identify risks: Walk through each category with specific prompts: "What happens if your biggest client leaves tomorrow?"
- Everything scores as critical: Recalibrate — compare each risk to "business cannot operate tomorrow." Only true existential threats are 5/5.
- User wants to ignore risks: Focus on the one risk that scares them most. Getting one mitigation plan in place builds the habit.
- Risk has already materialized: Switch to incident response. Document what happened, stabilize, then update the assessment with lessons learned.
- User is overwhelmed: Start with the top 3 risks only. A plan for 3 risks is infinitely better than no plan for 20.