Osint

Configuration

Read .jobops/config.json. If missing, stop with:

JOBOPS NOT CONFIGURED Run /jobops:setup to initialize your workspace.

Use config.directories.<key> for all file paths in this skill. Use config.preferences.cultural_profile if this skill generates resume-style content. Use config.preferences.default_jurisdiction if this skill has jurisdiction-sensitive logic (crisis/legal skills accept --jurisdiction=<ISO-3166-2> to override).

Company-Intelligence Path Resolution

This skill writes to a per-company folder under {config.directories.company_intelligence}/{Company}/. Before dispatching any sub-agent:

1. Extract {Company} from the job-posting frontmatter or from the explicit argument (e.g., /jobops:osint Google).
2. Compose the target folder: {config.directories.company_intelligence}/{Company}/.
3. If the folder already exists, prompt the user:
   • refresh — overwrite all per-agent files.
   • append — keep existing files, write a new summary_{YYYYMMDD}.md alongside them (do not modify per-agent files in place).
   • skip — exit without running.
4. Sub-agents write to fixed filenames: corporate.md, legal.md, leadership.md, compensation.md, culture.md, market.md.
5. Person-level reports from osint-person land under {Company}/people/{interviewer_name}.md.
6. The aggregated synthesis lands at {Company}/summary.md on refresh or {Company}/summary_{YYYYMMDD}.md on append.

Mission Overview

Deploy 6 specialized OSINT agents simultaneously to conduct parallel intelligence gathering on {{ARG1}}:

1. osint-corporate - Corporate structure, financials, strategic positioning
2. osint-legal - Litigation history, regulatory compliance, legal risks
3. osint-leadership - Executive backgrounds, leadership analysis
4. osint-compensation - Salary benchmarking, benefits, total rewards
5. osint-culture - Employee sentiment, workplace culture analysis
6. osint-market - Industry analysis, competitive landscape

Operational Protocol

Phase 1: Parallel Agent Deployment

✓ Deploying 6 specialized intelligence agents for target analysis

Launch all 6 specialized OSINT agents simultaneously to maximize intelligence gathering efficiency. Each agent will conduct focused research in their specialized domain and produce standardized intelligence reports saved to the resolved per-company folder {config.directories.company_intelligence}/{Company}/.

CRITICAL: You must deploy all agents in parallel using a single message with multiple Task tool calls. This ensures simultaneous execution rather than sequential processing.

FILE STORAGE REQUIREMENTS: Each specialized agent MUST save their complete intelligence report to {config.directories.company_intelligence}/{Company}/ using the fixed filenames (the folder path encodes company identity; the calling skill handles refresh vs. append dating):

• corporate.md
• legal.md
• leadership.md
• compensation.md
• culture.md
• market.md

When dispatching each sub-agent, pass the fully resolved target path explicitly in the Task instruction so the sub-agent writes to the correct location.

YAML FRONT MATTER: Prepend each specialized report with:

---
company: {{ARG1}}
report_type: corporate|legal|leadership|compensation|culture|market
generated_by: /osint
generated_on: <ISO8601 timestamp>
output_type: osint_corporate|osint_legal|osint_leadership|osint_compensation|osint_culture|osint_market
status: final
version: 1.0
---

Set report_type to the appropriate domain and output_type to the matching osint_{report_type} (e.g. corporate → osint_corporate) — this is the filename-independent detection key downstream tooling trusts. Update timestamps and versioning on reruns.

Example deployment pattern:

Deploy all 6 OSINT agents simultaneously to research [COMPANY]:
- Corporate intelligence (structure, finances, strategy)
- Legal intelligence (litigation, regulatory, compliance)
- Leadership intelligence (executives, personnel, governance)
- Compensation intelligence (salaries, benefits, equity)
- Culture intelligence (employee sentiment, workplace environment)
- Market intelligence (industry analysis, competitive positioning)

Phase 2: Intelligence Synthesis & Integration

After receiving all 6 specialized intelligence reports, synthesize findings into a comprehensive Master Intelligence Report following the structure below. The Master Intelligence Report MUST be saved to {config.directories.company_intelligence}/{Company}/summary.md on refresh, or {config.directories.company_intelligence}/{Company}/summary_{YYYYMMDD}.md on append.

Prepend the master report with:

---
company: {{ARG1}}
generated_by: /osint master
generated_on: <ISO8601 timestamp>
sources:
  - corporate
  - legal
  - leadership
  - compensation
  - culture
  - market
output_type: osint_summary
status: final
version: 1.0
---

Master Intelligence Report Format

# Master Intelligence Report: {{ARG1}}
**Report Date:** [Date]
**Intelligence Sources:** 6 Specialized OSINT Agents
**Classification:** Strategic Intelligence / Company Assessment

## Executive Intelligence Summary

### Critical Findings
- **Overall Risk Assessment**: [High/Medium/Low]
- **Investment/Employment Recommendation**: [Strong Positive/Positive/Neutral/Negative/Strong Negative]
- **Key Opportunities**: [Top 3 strategic opportunities]
- **Key Risks**: [Top 3 critical risk factors]

### Intelligence Confidence Level
- **Overall Confidence**: [High/Medium/Low] based on source quality and verification
- **Information Gaps**: [Areas requiring additional intelligence]

## Corporate Intelligence Summary
*[Synthesized from osint-corporate report]*

### Financial Health Assessment
- **Revenue Trend**: [Growth/Stable/Declining]
- **Financial Stability**: [Strong/Adequate/Concerning]
- **Strategic Position**: [Market leader/Strong competitor/Follower/Struggling]

### Key Corporate Findings
- [Top 3 corporate intelligence findings]
- [Critical business developments]
- [Strategic partnerships and positioning]

## Legal Intelligence Summary
*[Synthesized from osint-legal report]*

### Legal Risk Profile
- **Litigation Risk**: [High/Medium/Low]
- **Regulatory Compliance**: [Strong/Adequate/Concerning]
- **Active Legal Issues**: [Number and materiality of active cases]

### Key Legal Findings
- [Significant litigation or regulatory issues]
- [Compliance track record]
- [Legal risk factors for employment/business]

## Leadership Intelligence Summary
*[Synthesized from osint-leadership report]*

### Leadership Assessment
- **Executive Quality**: [Exceptional/Strong/Adequate/Concerning]
- **Leadership Stability**: [Stable/Some turnover/High turnover]
- **Governance Quality**: [Strong/Adequate/Weak]

### Key Leadership Findings
- [Executive backgrounds and track record]
- [Leadership effectiveness and red flags]
- [Succession planning and key person risks]

## Compensation Intelligence Summary
*[Synthesized from osint-compensation report]*

### Compensation Profile
- **Market Position**: [Above market/Competitive/Below market]
- **Total Rewards**: [Comprehensive/Standard/Limited]
- **Equity Upside**: [High/Medium/Low potential]

### Key Compensation Findings
- [Salary ranges and competitiveness]
- [Benefits and perks highlights]
- [Equity and bonus structures]
- [Negotiation leverage assessment]

## Culture Intelligence Summary
*[Synthesized from osint-culture report]*

### Culture Assessment
- **Employee Satisfaction**: [High/Medium/Low]
- **Culture Rating**: [X.X/5.0 across platforms]
- **Work Environment**: [Excellent/Good/Fair/Poor]

### Key Culture Findings
- [Employee satisfaction themes]
- [Management quality feedback]
- [Work-life balance and flexibility]
- [Diversity and inclusion practices]

## Market Intelligence Summary
*[Synthesized from osint-market report]*

### Market Position
- **Industry Health**: [Growing/Stable/Declining]
- **Competitive Position**: [Market leader/Strong/Follower/Weak]
- **Growth Prospects**: [High/Medium/Low]

### Key Market Findings
- [Industry trends and opportunities]
- [Competitive advantages and threats]
- [Market position and differentiation]

## Integrated Risk Analysis

### High Priority Risks
1. **[Risk Category]**: [Specific risk description and potential impact]
2. **[Risk Category]**: [Specific risk description and potential impact]
3. **[Risk Category]**: [Specific risk description and potential impact]

### Medium Priority Risks
- [List of secondary risks with brief descriptions]

### Low Priority Risks
- [List of minor risks for completeness]

## Strategic Opportunities Assessment

### High Value Opportunities
1. **[Opportunity Category]**: [Specific opportunity and strategic value]
2. **[Opportunity Category]**: [Specific opportunity and strategic value]
3. **[Opportunity Category]**: [Specific opportunity and strategic value]

### Secondary Opportunities
- [Additional opportunities worth considering]

## Intelligence-Based Recommendations

### For Job Candidates
- **Employment Recommendation**: [Accept/Consider Carefully/Decline]
- **Negotiation Strategy**: [Areas of leverage and approach]
- **Red Flags to Explore**: [Issues requiring clarification in interviews]
- **Questions to Ask**: [Specific questions based on intelligence gathered]

### For Investors/Business Partners
- **Partnership Recommendation**: [Proceed/Proceed with Caution/Avoid]
- **Due Diligence Focus**: [Areas requiring additional investigation]
- **Risk Mitigation**: [Strategies to address identified risks]

### For Competitors/Market Analysis
- **Competitive Threat Level**: [High/Medium/Low]
- **Competitive Advantages**: [Company's key strengths to monitor]
- **Competitive Vulnerabilities**: [Areas where company may be attacked]

## Cross-Domain Intelligence Correlations

### Corroborating Evidence
- [Where multiple intelligence domains confirm same findings]

### Contradictory Intelligence
- [Where different domains show conflicting information]

### Intelligence Gaps
- [Areas where additional research is needed]

## Follow-Up Intelligence Collection

### Immediate Priorities
- [High-priority areas needing additional research]

### Medium-term Monitoring
- [Areas requiring ongoing intelligence updates]

### Long-term Surveillance
- [Factors to monitor over extended period]

## Intelligence Sources & Reliability

### High Reliability Sources
- [Sources with strong track record and verification]

### Medium Reliability Sources
- [Sources with adequate verification]

### Lower Reliability Sources
- [Sources requiring additional verification]

## Appendices

### Appendix A: Individual Agent Reports
- Links to full detailed reports from each specialized agent

### Appendix B: Source Bibliography
- Complete list of all intelligence sources consulted

### Appendix C: Intelligence Collection Timeline
- Dates and sequence of intelligence gathering activities

Quality Standards

Intelligence Integration Requirements

1. Cross-Reference Verification: Corroborate findings across multiple intelligence domains with source citations
2. Contradiction Resolution: Address any conflicting intelligence between agents with source attribution
3. Gap Identification: Clearly identify areas where intelligence is insufficient with explicit labeling
4. Risk Prioritization: Rank risks by severity and probability with supporting evidence and sources
5. Actionable Insights: Provide specific, actionable recommendations based on intelligence with clear source attribution

Report Quality Criteria

• Comprehensiveness: Cover all critical aspects of company assessment with complete source documentation
• Objectivity: Present balanced analysis without bias, clearly distinguishing facts from analysis
• Evidence-Based: Support all conclusions with specific intelligence sources including URLs where available
• Strategic Focus: Emphasize insights most relevant for decision-making with clear source provenance
• Professional Standards: Meet intelligence community standards for analysis with rigorous citation practices

MANDATORY SOURCE ATTRIBUTION REQUIREMENTS

1. Direct Citations: All factual claims MUST include inline citations with source URLs where available
2. Footnotes: Use numbered footnotes for detailed source information and methodology
3. Inference Labels: Clearly mark inferred, calculated, or derived information as [INFERRED], [CALCULATED], or [DERIVED]
4. Assumption Flags: Mark assumptions as [ASSUMPTION] with reasoning provided
5. Confidence Indicators: Include confidence levels (HIGH/MEDIUM/LOW) for all major findings
6. Source Quality Ratings: Rate each source as (HIGH RELIABILITY), (MEDIUM RELIABILITY), or (LOW RELIABILITY)
7. Date Attribution: Include access/publication dates for all sources
8. Missing Source Disclosure: Explicitly state when sources are unavailable or information is based on industry standards

Operational Security

Ethical Guidelines

• Use only publicly available information sources
• Respect privacy and legal boundaries
• Maintain objectivity and avoid speculation
• Provide source attribution for verification
• Flag limitations and confidence levels

Information Handling

• Classify intelligence appropriately
• Protect sources and methods
• Ensure accurate attribution
• Maintain audit trail of intelligence gathering

Mission Success Criteria

1. Complete Coverage: All 6 intelligence domains researched thoroughly
2. Parallel Execution: All agents deployed simultaneously for efficiency
3. Quality Integration: Findings properly synthesized and cross-referenced
4. Actionable Intelligence: Clear recommendations for decision-making
5. Professional Standards: Report meets intelligence community quality standards

Execute this comprehensive intelligence operation with the thoroughness and professionalism of an elite intelligence organization.