Checklist Design — checklist design principle
checklist-designer agent checklist quality design principle and pattern.
checklist type classification
Atul Gawande classification (The Checklist Manifesto)
| type | description | usage timing |
|---|---|---|
| DO-CONFIRM | task after confirm | specialist basis00M dependency degree |
| READ-DO | orderversus execution | reportspecialist/basis task/risk task |
| COMMUNICATION | team between information deliver | personnumberpersontotal, versus |
SOP annualtotal type
| checklist type | SOP mapping | examplewhen |
|---|---|---|
| companybefore inspection | procedure whenwork before preparation confirm | equipment inspection, re- preparation |
| stageby confirm | each procedure stage complete confirm | , quality company |
| complete verify | procedure after result confirm | final number, personnumber standard |
| basis company | cyclequality operations status inspection | monthbetween planbefore inspection, minutebasis company |
checklist writing 7principle
1. MECE (Mutually Exclusive, Collectively Exhaustive)
- item between during None
- overall
- categoryby
2. item = confirm
** example**: "from status and annual confirm" ** example**: "from process execution duringpersondegree confirm" + " ping confirm"
3. verify possibleKorean standard specify
** example**: " also qualityKoreandegree confirm" ** example**: " also 18~22°C scopepersondegree confirm ( position: during from)"
4. 5~9item rule (Killer Items during)
- overall item during core risk item only by
- 9item exceeding when category minute
- " also planbeforeKorean item"
5. order = task flow
- actual task order and dayvalue
- dependency total reflected (A complete after B)
6. example processing
- fail when action procedure specify
- standard included
7. cyclequality items
- usage feedback reflected (minutebasis 1)
- company/personwhen after i.e.when
checklist template
READ-DO checklist (stageby execution)
# [taskpeople] checklist
- version: v1.0 | final revision: 2025-01-15 | person:
## companybefore preparation
- needed tool/re- preparation?
- task authority confirm?
- before stage deliverable personnumber?
## execution stage
- stage 1: [specific action] → standard: [figure/condition]
- stage 2: [specific action] → standard: [figure/condition]
- stage 3: [specific action] → standard: [figure/condition]
## complete confirm
- deliverable standard : [standard]
- next stage person responsibleto persontotal?
## fail when action
- standard un- item → [person responsible]to reporting
- re-task needed when → [procedure] reference
DO-CONFIRM checklist (companyafter confirm)
# [taskpeople] confirm checklist
- daywhen: ______ | confirmspecialist: ______
| # | confirm item | standard | result | notes |
|---|----------|------|------|------|
| 1 | [item] | [standard] | □pass □fail | |
| 2 | [item] | [standard] | □pass □fail | |
- total ___case during pass ___case, fail ___case
- fail action: ___________________
quality design
standard setting
| element | description |
|---|---|
| standard | company basis for minimum condition |
| required item | mustwhen item (1case also failure when fail) |
| optional item | fail also conditiondepartment and possible |
| and standard | required 100% + optional N% or more |
| conditiondepartment and | when action plan when Koreanwhenquality |
review process
1. deliverable ( specialistto)
2. checklist based review
3. : PASS / CONDITIONAL / FAIL
4. CONDITIONAL: when deadline setting → re-company
5. FAIL: before stage exchange → re-task
checklist quality checklist
| item | standard |
|---|---|
| item number | category 5~9items |
| verify standard | all item quality standard |
| example | fail when action specify |
| responsibilityspecialist | confirmspecialist/approver specify |
| version information | version, date, approver |
| consistency | SOP procedure document and day |