Patent Drafter

Patent Drafter — Patent Specification Drafting Pipeline

Converts an invention's technical idea into a systematic patent specification set.

Execution Mode

Agent Team — 5 agents communicate directly via SendMessage and cross-verify each other's work.

Agent Composition

Workflow

Phase 1: Preparation (Performed Directly by Orchestrator)

1. Extract from user input:
   • Title of Invention: Technical title
   • Technical Field: The field to which the invention belongs
   • Invention Overview: Core technical concept, components, operating principles
   • Problem to be Solved: Problems with existing technology and the problem to be solved
   • Existing Materials (optional): Invention report, technical documents, prototype information
2. Create the _workspace/ directory in the project root
3. Organize the input and save to _workspace/00_input.md
4. Determine the execution mode based on the requested scope

Phase 2: Team Assembly and Execution

Tasks 3a (Specification) and 3b (Drawing) are executed in parallel. Both depend on claims, so they can start simultaneously after Task 2 is complete. However, both sides communicate for reference numeral coordination.

Inter-agent Communication Flow:

• prior-art-researcher completes -> Delivers differentiation points and design-around direction to claim-drafter
• claim-drafter completes -> Delivers elements and terms to specification-writer, structure to drawing-designer
• specification-writer <-> drawing-designer: Mutual coordination of reference numeral system
• patent-reviewer cross-verifies all deliverables. If Red must-fix items found, requests revision from relevant agent (up to 2 times)

Phase 3: Integration and Final Deliverables

1. Review all files in _workspace/
2. Verify that all Red must-fix items from the review report have been addressed
3. Report the final summary to the user:
   • Prior Art Search Report — 01_prior_art_report.md
   • Claim Set — 02_claims.md
   • Detailed Description of Invention — 03_specification.md
   • Drawing Description — 04_drawings.md
   • Review Report — 05_review_report.md

Modes by Request Scope

Data Transfer Protocol

File naming convention: {order}_{agent}_{deliverable}.{extension}

Error Handling

Test Scenarios

Normal Flow

Prompt: "Write a patent specification for an IoT-based smart flowerpot automatic watering system. It measures with a soil moisture sensor and AI adjusts the watering amount based on plant type." Expected Results:

• Prior Art Search: 5+ prior patents related to IoT watering systems and smart flowerpots
• Claims: Apparatus independent claim + method independent claim + 5+ dependent claims
• Specification: Complete structure from technical field through embodiments
• Drawings: System block diagram + detailed structure diagram + flowchart
• Review: All consistency matrix items verified

Partial Flow

Prompt: "Just search prior art for this invention idea" Expected Results:

• Switches to search mode (prior-art-researcher only)
• Prior art list + in-depth analysis + novelty/inventive step assessment

Error Flow

Prompt: "Write a patent specification, the idea is new battery technology" Expected Results:

• Full pipeline execution, additional questions due to insufficient invention details
• When drafting with minimum info, many items marked "inventor verification needed"
• Review report includes "recommend rewriting after supplementing detailed information"

Agent Extension Skills