revfactory Rhetoric Patterns — numbercompany pattern library
speech-writer / debate-preparer agent persuasioncapability numbercompany pattern.
speech structure pattern
pattern 1: Monroe's Motivated Sequence
| stage | purpose | technique |
|---|---|---|
| 1. Attention (week) | during | statistics, story, question |
| 2. Need (needed) | problem person | currentactual when, data present |
| 3. Satisfaction | present | specific approach, quality description |
| 4. Visualization (visualization) | un- | nature/failure scenario |
| 5. Action (action) | action also | specific , CTA |
quality: persuasion/proposal presentation, investment value, speech
pattern 2: PREP (Point-Reason-Example-Point)
Point: " complete "
Reason: "current un- cost annualbetween 30% increaseand basis whendocument"
Example: "competitor A after person cost 40% reduction"
Point: "according tofrom 3minutebasisto beforeexchange complete "
quality: , Q&A answer, meeting
pattern 3: problem--profit (PSB)
Problem: current [problem] because [departmentquality result] occurrenceand
Solution: [proposal] through problem to do number
Benefit: through [specific profit] number
pattern 4: story
1. day (situation setting)
2. before (etc./problem)
3. beforeexchangepoint (insight/decision)
4. (action/result)
5. (message)
3element
| element | description | applied technique |
|---|---|---|
| Ethos | specialist qualification/ also | experience grade, specialistnature, nature |
| Pathos (emotion) | audience emotion | story, , wheneach material |
| Logos | quality basis | data, statistics, persontotal |
presentation typeby proportion
| presentation type | Ethos | Pathos | Logos |
|---|---|---|---|
| basisspeech | 30% | 40% | 30% |
| investment value | 20% | 20% | 60% |
| basisdepartment | 20% | 50% | 30% |
| presentation | 30% | 10% | 60% |
| crisis response | 40% | 30% | 30% |
structure (debate)
Toulmin model
Claim (argument): [/]
← Data (basis): [companyactual/]
← Warrant (report): [basis→argument annual ]
← Backing : [report basis]
← Qualifier (Korean): "versusdepartmentminute case", "generalas"
← Rebuttal (counterargument): "However, [example situation]from..."
counterargument response strategy
| strategy | description | examplewhen |
|---|---|---|
| acceptance after beforeexchange | daydepartment person after core re- | ", degree only duringKorean ..." |
| point beforeexchange | "cost not investment " | |
| response | versus present | "actual data report..." |
| conditiondepartment acceptance | limitationquality person | " situationfrom degree, context..." |
numbercompanyquality value
| value | description | examplewhen |
|---|---|---|
| (Anaphora) | sentence whenwork | " to do number . ." |
| versus (Antithesis) | versus structure | "work eachdegree tax, tax" |
| minute (Rule of Three) | 3items | ", and, planbefore" |
| numbercompany question (Rhetorical Q) | question | " ?" |
| (Analogy) | Korean | "data whenversus " |
| specialist utilization | specific figure | "3 1case company ..." |
quality checklist
| item | standard |
|---|---|
| structure | peopleKorean whenwork-duringbetween- |
| core message | 1sentenceas summary possible |
| Ethos/Pathos/Logos | 3element balanced |
| CTA | specific action |
| time qualitynature | minute 150(Korean standard) |