Translation Quality MQM — Translation Quality Assessment Framework
MQM error classification, severity system, and score calculation formulas used by the quality-reviewer agent when verifying translation quality.
subject Agent
quality-reviewer — of MQM Framework Translation Quality in apply.
MQM error classification
1: vs (7 )
|
|
description |
weight |
| Accuracy (Accuracy) |
ACC |
Source text ofof before |
x2.0 |
| Fluency (Fluency) |
FLU |
Target languageof |
x1.5 |
| Terminology (Terminology) |
TER |
Terminology Consistencyand Accuracy |
x1.5 |
| Style (Style) |
STY |
Text typein Writing style |
x1.0 |
| to (Locale) |
LOC |
Localization |
x1.5 |
| Design (Design) |
DES |
, Layout, |
x0.5 |
| **** (Verity) |
VER |
relationship, Accuracy |
x2.0 |
2: type
ACC (Accuracy)
|
type |
description |
when |
| ACC-ADD |
andTranslation |
Source textin Information |
"good" → " " |
| ACC-OMI |
omission |
Source text Information Translation |
omission |
| ACC-MIS |
mistranslation |
of |
"decrease" → "" |
| ACC-UNT |
Translation |
Source text vsto |
Translation subject |
| ACC-AMB |
duringof |
Translation |
|
FLU (Fluency)
|
type |
description |
| FLU-GRA |
|
, , when, |
| FLU-PUN |
|
, , |
| FLU-SPE |
customized |
, |
| FLU-REG |
language etc. |
Formality level |
| FLU-AWK |
|
|
TER (Terminology)
|
type |
description |
| TER-INC |
Terminology |
Glossaryand Translation |
| TER-DNT |
DNT |
Translation Terminology Translation |
| TER-WRG |
Terminology |
Industry standardsand Terminology |
LOC (to)
|
type |
description |
| LOC-DAT |
Date Format |
Date application |
| LOC-NUM |
number Format |
, |
| LOC-CUR |
Currency Format |
Currency , |
| LOC-UNI |
Units of measurement |
/, / |
| LOC-CUL |
|
and conflict expression |
severity etc.
| etc. |
|
|
|
| **** (Critical) |
CRI |
25 |
of before , , expression |
| major (Major) |
MAJ |
10 |
of , |
| **** (Minor) |
MIN |
1 |
Style , |
score calculation Formula
when = SUM(per severity x weight)
= when / x 1000
Quality etc.:
0~5 → Excellent (Publishing )
5~15 → Good ( after Publishing)
15~30 → Acceptable ( )
30~50 → Poor (vs )
50+ → Reject (Translation )
Quality
# Translation Quality
## summary
- Source text language / Target language: [X → Y]
- : [N]
- : MQM v3.0
- : [X.X] / etc.: [Excellent|Good|Acceptable|Poor|Reject]
## distribution
| | CRI | MAJ | MIN | during |
|------|-----|-----|-----|----------|
| Accuracy (ACC) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Fluency (FLU) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Terminology (TER) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Style (STY) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| to (LOC) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Design (DES) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| (VER) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| **** | 0 | 0 | 0 | **0** |
## detailed
| # | | Source text | Translated text | | severity | Suggestion |
|---|------|------|--------|---------|--------|----------|
| 1 | p.3 L12 | ... | ... | ACC-MIS | MAJ | ... |
## (Positive Findings)
- [ ]
##
1. [ ]
2. [ ]
per during Verification
|
Verification |
per of |
| **** |
ACC Accuracy, VER |
Terminology Accuracy, |
| of |
ACC Accuracy, TER Terminology |
of Terminology, / Accuracy |
| **** |
FLU Fluency, STY Style |
, Tone & voice |
| /IT |
TER Terminology, ACC Accuracy |
UI , Preservation |
| **** |
FLU Fluency, LOC to |
ric , |
| **** |
ACC Accuracy, VER |
number, Currency, |
languageper major
→
|
description |
correct |
|
vsto Translation |
to before |
| and Translation |
"~ during" |
|
| and |
|
|
| Translation |
"the/a" "/of"to |
vs |
→
|
description |
correct |
| level |
when Selection |
Audiencein |
|
to |
Verification |
|
vsto |
|
1---2name: translation-quality-mqm3description: MQM(Multidimensional Quality Metrics) Translation Quality Framework, error classification , severity weight, score calculation Formula quality-reviewer Extended Skill. 'MQM ', 'Translation Quality ', 'error classification', 'Translation QA', 'Quality ric' etc. Translation Qualityof Verification . , Translation Localization application of .4---56# Translation Quality MQM — Translation Quality Assessment Framework78MQM error classification, severity system, and score calculation formulas used by the quality-reviewer agent when verifying translation quality.910## subject Agent1112`quality-reviewer` — of MQM Framework Translation Quality in apply.1314## MQM error classification 1516### 1: vs (7 )1718| | | description | weight |19|------|------|------|--------|20| **Accuracy** (Accuracy) | ACC | Source text ofof before | x2.0 |21| **Fluency** (Fluency) | FLU | Target languageof | x1.5 |22| **Terminology** (Terminology) | TER | Terminology Consistencyand Accuracy | x1.5 |23| **Style** (Style) | STY | Text typein Writing style | x1.0 |24| **to** (Locale) | LOC | Localization | x1.5 |25| **Design** (Design) | DES | , Layout, | x0.5 |26| **** (Verity) | VER | relationship, Accuracy | x2.0 |2728### 2: type2930#### ACC (Accuracy)31| | type | description | when |32|------|------|------|------|33| ACC-ADD | andTranslation | Source textin Information | "good" → " " |34| ACC-OMI | omission | Source text Information Translation | omission |35| ACC-MIS | mistranslation | of | "decrease" → "" |36| ACC-UNT | Translation | Source text vsto | Translation subject |37| ACC-AMB | duringof | Translation | |3839#### FLU (Fluency)40| | type | description |41|------|------|------|42| FLU-GRA | | , , when, |43| FLU-PUN | | , , |44| FLU-SPE | customized | , |45| FLU-REG | language etc. | Formality level |46| FLU-AWK | | |4748#### TER (Terminology)49| | type | description |50|------|------|------|51| TER-INC | Terminology | Glossaryand Translation |52| TER-DNT | DNT | Translation Terminology Translation |53| TER-WRG | Terminology | Industry standardsand Terminology |5455#### LOC (to)56| | type | description |57|------|------|------|58| LOC-DAT | Date Format | Date application |59| LOC-NUM | number Format | , |60| LOC-CUR | Currency Format | Currency , |61| LOC-UNI | Units of measurement | /, / |62| LOC-CUL | | and conflict expression |6364## severity etc.6566| etc. | | | |67|------|------|------|------|68| **** (Critical) | CRI | 25 | of before , , expression |69| **major** (Major) | MAJ | 10 | of , |70| **** (Minor) | MIN | 1 | Style , |7172## score calculation Formula7374```75when = SUM(per severity x weight)76 = when / x 10007778Quality etc.:79 0~5 → Excellent (Publishing )80 5~15 → Good ( after Publishing)81 15~30 → Acceptable ( )82 30~50 → Poor (vs )83 50+ → Reject (Translation )84```8586## Quality 8788```markdown89# Translation Quality 9091## summary92- Source text language / Target language: [X → Y]93- : [N]94- : MQM v3.095- : [X.X] / etc.: [Excellent|Good|Acceptable|Poor|Reject]9697## distribution9899| | CRI | MAJ | MIN | during |100|------|-----|-----|-----|----------|101| Accuracy (ACC) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |102| Fluency (FLU) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |103| Terminology (TER) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |104| Style (STY) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |105| to (LOC) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |106| Design (DES) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |107| (VER) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |108| **** | 0 | 0 | 0 | **0** |109110## detailed 111112| # | | Source text | Translated text | | severity | Suggestion |113|---|------|------|--------|---------|--------|----------|114| 1 | p.3 L12 | ... | ... | ACC-MIS | MAJ | ... |115116## (Positive Findings)117- [ ]118119## 1201. [ ]1212. [ ]122```123124## per during Verification 125126| | Verification | per of |127|--------|-----------|----------|128| **** | ACC Accuracy, VER | Terminology Accuracy, |129| **of** | ACC Accuracy, TER Terminology | of Terminology, / Accuracy |130| **** | FLU Fluency, STY Style | , Tone & voice |131| **/IT** | TER Terminology, ACC Accuracy | UI , Preservation |132| **** | FLU Fluency, LOC to | ric , |133| **** | ACC Accuracy, VER | number, Currency, |134135## languageper major 136137### → 138| | description | correct |139|------|------|-----------|140| | vsto Translation | to before |141| and Translation | "~ during" | |142| and | | |143| Translation | "the/a" "/of"to | vs |144145### → 146| | description | correct |147|------|------|-----------|148| level | when Selection | Audiencein |149| | to | Verification |150| | vsto | |
revfactory