event-study
You hand over an event (a date + a class) and either one ticker or a basket. The skill measures abnormal returns over the event window, compares each reaction to the name's own history, and aggregates across the cross-section when the input is wider than one event.
This is the workflow a quant or event-driven PM runs when asking "did the market actually react to this," "is the cross-section consistent," or "is this kind of event a tradeable signal." The output matches the format an analyst already reads: morning-note style for a single event, screener table for a cross-section, summary stats for an aggregate.
When to invoke
- A PM is sizing into a name post-print and wants to know "what's the T+5 base rate after a beat like this"
- A quant is testing whether dividend hikes (or cuts) lead to measurable abnormal returns across a sector
- A trader saw an unusual volume day on a peer and wants to know whether the event class historically resolves
- The user says "event study on X", "what's the average abnormal return after Y", "did the market price in Z", or "cross-section reaction across mega-cap tech earnings"
Three modes (determined by input shape)
The same code path runs all three; the shape of --tickers and
--event-date (vs --window) picks the output mode.
Mode 1: single (single ticker, single event)
Input: --ticker NVDA --event-date 2026-05-20 --event-class earnings
Output: a sell-side note with the event window returns, t-stat of this
event's abnormal return vs the name's prior reaction distribution, and
a one-line take. Matches the layout of
../earnings-drilldown but generalized to any
event class. See references/rendering.md.
Mode 2: cross-section (many tickers, one event period)
Input: --tickers AAPL,NVDA,MSFT,GOOGL,META --event-class earnings --period 2026Q2
Output: a comparison table (one row per ticker), plus a "Cross-section" footer with the average T+5 CAR, the median, the t-stat of the average against zero, and the correlation between surprise magnitude and reaction.
Mode 3: aggregate (many tickers, many events)
Input: --tickers AAPL,NVDA,MSFT,GOOGL,META --event-class earnings --window 2025-06-01..2026-06-24
Output: only the aggregate statistics. Average CAR by horizon (T+1, T+3, T+5), t-stat against zero, percentile distribution, n. No per-event detail in the rendered output (it's in the JSON for UIs). Used for "is this event class a tradeable signal at all" questions.
Event classes supported
| Class | Source | Trigger definition |
|---|---|---|
earnings |
Benzinga (Tier A) or SEC EDGAR 8-K item 2.02 (Tier B) | Press release date + time |
dividend_changes |
/v3/reference/dividends |
First dividend whose amount differs from the prior payment by ≥1% |
large_volume_spike |
computed from /v2/aggs/ticker/{T}/range/1/day/... |
Days where volume > 3σ of the trailing 30d mean, with a 5-day cooldown |
Each class has its own resolution helper documented in
references/event-class-definitions.md.
Adding a new event class is a clean PR: implement the resolver, add
a row to the table above, and the skill picks it up.
Out of scope for v1: analyst upgrades/downgrades (the Benzinga analyst-ratings endpoint wasn't reliably reachable in prior sessions; queued for v2), index inclusions/exclusions, M&A announcements.
What you need
- A list of tickers (one or many)
- Either a specific event date or a window
MASSIVE_API_KEYexported
Tiers:
- Tier A (full fidelity for earnings): Stocks Starter + Benzinga Earnings. True press release dates, consensus, surprise %, allows the "surprise vs reaction" correlation column in cross-section.
- Tier B (degraded earnings): Stocks Starter only. 8-K item 2.02
acceptance date as print date; no surprise %, so the cross-section
drops the surprise-vs-reaction correlation and falls back to
reaction-sign bucketing.
dividend_changesandlarge_volume_spikerun identically on either tier.
What you get back
Two output layers from one analysis.
Layer 1: canonical JSON matching
output-schema.json. Discriminated by
output_mode: single, cross_section, or aggregate. Each mode
exposes the per-subject event_window_returns, abnormal_returns,
and t_stat_vs_history. Cross-section and aggregate add the
cross-sectional summary block, which includes distribution_shape
(KDE-derived n_modes, modality label, tail label, skew, excess
kurtosis, sparkline) when n_subjects >= 10 so bimodal or fat-tailed
reactions surface instead of hiding behind a benign mean. UIs and
downstream agents consume this.
Layer 2: rendered output in hybrid mode:
single→ sell-side notecross_section→ comparison table + cross-section footeraggregate→ summary stats block
See references/rendering.md for the
full rules.
How it works
The pipeline is the same regardless of input shape; what changes is how the rendering layer collapses the result.
- Resolve events. Per
references/event-class-definitions.md, convert the input (ticker + class + date-or-window) into a list of concrete(ticker, event_date, event_metadata)tuples. - Pull daily aggregates for each ticker and SPY across the union of event windows plus a 30-day buffer on either side.
- Compute abnormal returns per
references/abnormal-returns.md. AR = raw_return − SPY_return at each horizon (T0, T+1, T+3, T+5). CAR = sum of ARs from T+1 through the horizon. - Compute t-stats per
references/t-stat-significance.md. For a single event, compare this event's T+5 CAR to the name's prior reaction distribution. For a cross-section, t-stat is the mean CAR across events vs zero. Both require n≥8 to be reported as significant; below that, the rendered output prints the t-stat but marks it "underpowered." - Aggregate cross-sectionally per
references/cross-section-methodology.mdwhenn_subjects > 1. Average CAR, median, t-stat vs zero, and the Pearson correlation between event magnitude and reaction. - Detect regime stability per
references/regime-stability.md: for any aggregate-mode result, compare the most-recent 4 events to the full window mean and flag when the gap is >1σ. Recent regime often differs from headline number. - Generate the take off the strongest signal: significant t-stat, regime shift, or surprise-vs-reaction correlation in cross-section.
Foundations used
massive-api-patternsfor REST auth, pagination, and the fallback chain.
Endpoints used
Earnings event class:
GET /benzinga/v1/earnings?ticker={T}&limit=20&order=desc&sort=date(Tier A): press release date, time, surprise %, fiscal period.GET https://data.sec.gov/submissions/CIK{cik}.json(Tier B fallback): SEC EDGAR 8-K filings filtered to item 2.02. Free, public, no API key required. Same date-resolution logic asearnings-drilldownTier B.
Dividend change event class:
GET /v3/reference/dividends?ticker={T}&limit=20&order=desc&sort=ex_dividend_date: cash dividend history; the resolver picks the first ex-date where the cash amount differs from the prior payment by ≥1%.
Volume spike event class:
GET /v2/aggs/ticker/{T}/range/1/day/{from}/{to}: same daily aggregates used for the return computation; the resolver computes volume z-score in-memory.
All classes:
GET /v2/aggs/ticker/{T}/range/1/day/{from}/{to}: daily closes for the ticker. One call per ticker.GET /v2/aggs/ticker/SPY/range/1/day/{from}/{to}: daily closes for SPY (the benchmark). One call total.
Doesn't handle (yet)
- CAPM-style abnormal returns. The skill uses a simple SPY-naive
benchmark (AR = raw − SPY). A v2 would estimate per-name beta on
the 60-day pre-event window and compute AR = raw − (alpha + beta *
SPY). For mega-caps the difference is small (beta is close to 1);
for higher-beta names it matters. Schema reserves
model: "spy" | "capm"so the upgrade doesn't break consumers. - Multi-day pre-event run-up. Some event types (M&A leaks, guidance pre-announces) show abnormal returns before the official event date. The skill measures from T0 forward only.
- Sample-aware significance. Below n=8, t-stats are reported but marked "underpowered" rather than computing a small-sample correction. Bootstrap CIs would be cleaner; queued.
- Event clustering. When multiple events fire in the same window (e.g. earnings + dividend hike same week), the skill attributes the full return to whichever event the user asked about. A cleaner treatment would attribute by cross-section dummy; queued.
- Intraday windows. Event windows are daily closes only. No pre-market or 30-minute reaction measurement.
These are clean PR extensions and welcome contributions.