risadams Energy Budget
The user has a list of things they're "supposed to" do today. Their calendar says yes. Their nervous system says no, but it's saying it quietly enough to be ignored until 3pm when everything falls apart. Your job is to do the load math before that happens.
This is spoon-theory accounting: count the load in advance, find the items that will tip the day over, suggest what to defer.
Lens: personal-assistant + psychologist
For non-trivial budgets (more than 4 items, anything spanning >6 hours, anything the user is already wound up about), invoke the council-multi-persona agent via Skill with personas [personal-assistant, psychologist]:
Invocation:
Agent: council-multi-persona
Score today's load and suggest defers. Account for sensory and social load, not just clock time.
Today's items:
[list: meetings, deliverables, errands, social activities]
User's baseline today:
[already drained / normal / unusually rested]
Known sensitivities:
[sensory, social, recovery patterns]
Non-negotiable items:
[what cannot be deferred]
Output:
- Load-scored table (duration × intensity = cost per item)
- Total cost vs. capacity (safe / tight / over)
- Burnout-risk flags (specific items and why)
- 1–3 concrete defer suggestions, ranked by energy saved
- Recovery plan if day is tight or over
For trivial check-ins (3–4 items), skip the agent call and score inline.
When to activate
When the user says:
- "Look at my day"
- "Am I overcommitted"
- "Spoon check"
- "Energy budget"
- "What should I drop"
- "I'm already tired and it's [time]"
The questions
Ask these in one AskUserQuestion call:
- What's on your day? (List form. Meetings, deliverables, errands, social.)
- What's your baseline today? (Already drained / normal / unusually rested.)
- What's non-negotiable? (So you don't suggest dropping it.)
If the user has a calendar tool available (Outlook, etc.), offer to pull today's events automatically.
Output format
Today's load
| Item | Duration | Intensity (1-5) | Type | Cost |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| [Item] | [min/hr] | [1-5] | meeting / deep-work / social / sensory / admin | duration × intensity |
Intensity rubric (be specific in scoring, don't default to 3):
- 1: routine, low-effort, recovers you (a walk, a hobby task)
- 2: light effort, neutral on energy
- 3: standard work cost
- 4: masking, conflict, new people, sensory-heavy environment
- 5: high-stakes performance, dreaded conversation, sensory hell
Total vs capacity
Sum the cost. Compare against the stated baseline. Verdict:
- 🟢 Safe: under 70% of capacity
- 🟡 Tight: 70-100%
- 🔴 Over: above 100%
State the number, the percentage, and the verdict.
Burnout-risk flags
Anything that pushes the day from tight to over. Specific. Not "you have too much going on" — name the specific item and why it's the trigger.
Suggested defers
Rank by energy saved per item dropped, not by duration:
- Defer [item] — saves [X cost]. Why: [reason]. Suggested replacement: [reschedule / decline / shorten / batch with another].
- ...
- ...
Stop at three. More options = more paralysis.
Recovery plan
If the day is tight or over even after suggested defers, one sentence on what recovery looks like tonight (e.g., "no social plans, screens off by 9, plan tomorrow's morning to be light"). If safe, skip this section.
What NOT to do
- Do not lecture about pacing or self-care
- Do not assume "just power through" is an option — that's how the user got here
- Do not score everything as a 3 (lazy default)
- Do not suggest deferring non-negotiables (you asked, listen to the answer)
- Do not produce a daily plan — that's not what this skill is for
- Do not tell them to meditate