Autoresearch Goal
This is a Hermes-native autoresearch-goal workflow skill.
Why This Exists
autoresearch-goal exists to keep research work explicit, evidence-backed, and inside the Hermes/executor boundary instead of relying on ad hoc chat narration.
Do Not Use When
- The request is casual chat, a status-only acknowledgement, or another workflow has stronger routing evidence.
- The user needs implementation, review, CI, merge, or external publishing evidence that has not been delegated or observed.
Examples
Good example:
- Prompt: autoresearch-goal: keep researching AI agent memory practices until the evidence gaps are closed or logged.
- Expected behavior: Run a durable research loop with critic checks, source gaps, and a stop or checkpoint condition.
- Why: The request is research that needs persistence and review, not a one-shot brief.
Bad example:
- Prompt: autoresearch-goal: treat casual chat or unaccepted work as if this workflow already produced verified results.
- Expected behavior: Ask a clarification question or route to a narrower workflow instead of forcing
autoresearch-goal.
- Why: The request lacks the required inputs or would overclaim work that Hermes did not observe.
Completion Checklist
- The research question, source boundaries, recency assumptions, and confidence level are named.
- Observed sources, inference, synthesis, and unresolved retrieval gaps are separated.
- Follow-up planning or handoff uses the research summary without calling it execution evidence.
Recovery Notes
- If sources cannot be accessed, state the retrieval gap and use only observed local context.
- If evidence is thin or one-sided, lower confidence and ask for a narrower source boundary.
Workflow Lane
- Current lane: Research and company ops (
product-docs, source-finder, web-research, research, best-practice-research, autoresearch-goal, model-optimization, inference-serving, +19 more) - research, signals, ops, and briefings.
- If intent belongs to another lane, hand back to
oh-my-hermes or name the adjacent workflow.
- Shared product, routing, compatibility, and evidence rules:
omh-routing/references/skill-common-rail.md.
Use When
Use for validator-gated research that needs durable artifacts.
Strong routing signals: `autoresearch-goal`, `research goal`, `durable research`, `critic research`
Catalog Metadata
Category: research
Phase: durable-research
Hermes role: researcher
Quality tier: validator-gated
Reasoning demand: standard
Quality bar:
- Define validator criteria before gathering evidence.
- Run each cycle as evidence-gap closure: name the open gaps the cycle targets, then stop at the validator criteria or the declared iteration budget, whichever comes first.
- Keep durable research artifacts separate from coding execution evidence.
- Stop with next questions or a source-backed synthesis when validation is incomplete.
Handoff policy:
Keep durable research in Hermes-managed artifacts; do not convert to executor handoff unless the research produces an accepted coding task.
Required inputs:
- research objective
- validator criteria
- source boundaries
Expected outputs:
- research artifact
- validator result
- next questions
Artifact expectations:
- durable research ledger or checklist
Safety rules:
- Do not imply hidden Hermes runtime behavior.
- Use the smallest verification that can prove the claim.
Runtime Evidence
Preferred harness for this skill: research.
omh runtime record --skill autoresearch-goal --harness research --status started
Record observed delegation results; otherwise return not_available or not_observed.
Prepared OMH routing is not execution, review, CI, merge-readiness, or merge evidence.
- Treat wrapper memory/context summaries as advisory local context, not proof of opaque Hermes memory reads or changes.
Preserve workflow intent and stop conditions; verify before claiming completion.
Use Hermes-native subagent/delegation features when available: native subagents -> Hermes delegation when available, otherwise sequential lanes.
Shared product, compatibility, topology, memory, harness, and execution rules: omh-routing/references/skill-common-rail.md. Load it when applicable; otherwise name an unavailable capability.
1---
2name: "omh-autoresearch-goal"
3description: "[omh] Hermes adaptation for durable research-goal execution. Use when the user says: autoresearch-goal, research goal, durable research, critic research."
4metadata:
5 hermes:
6 tags: [workflow, oh-my-hermes, research]
7 category: research
8 phase: durable-research
9 role: researcher
10 quality_tier: validator-gated
11---
12
13# Autoresearch Goal
14
15This is a Hermes-native `autoresearch-goal` workflow skill.
16
17## Why This Exists
18
19`autoresearch-goal` exists to keep `research` work explicit, evidence-backed, and inside the Hermes/executor boundary instead of relying on ad hoc chat narration.
20
21## Do Not Use When
22
23- The request is casual chat, a status-only acknowledgement, or another workflow has stronger routing evidence.
24- The user needs implementation, review, CI, merge, or external publishing evidence that has not been delegated or observed.
25
26## Examples
27
28Good example:
29
30- Prompt: autoresearch-goal: keep researching AI agent memory practices until the evidence gaps are closed or logged.
31- Expected behavior: Run a durable research loop with critic checks, source gaps, and a stop or checkpoint condition.
32- Why: The request is research that needs persistence and review, not a one-shot brief.
33
34Bad example:
35
36- Prompt: autoresearch-goal: treat casual chat or unaccepted work as if this workflow already produced verified results.
37- Expected behavior: Ask a clarification question or route to a narrower workflow instead of forcing `autoresearch-goal`.
38- Why: The request lacks the required inputs or would overclaim work that Hermes did not observe.
39
40## Completion Checklist
41
42- The research question, source boundaries, recency assumptions, and confidence level are named.
43- Observed sources, inference, synthesis, and unresolved retrieval gaps are separated.
44- Follow-up planning or handoff uses the research summary without calling it execution evidence.
45
46## Recovery Notes
47
48- If sources cannot be accessed, state the retrieval gap and use only observed local context.
49- If evidence is thin or one-sided, lower confidence and ask for a narrower source boundary.
50
51## Workflow Lane
52
53- Current lane: **Research and company ops** (`product-docs`, `source-finder`, `web-research`, `research`, `best-practice-research`, `autoresearch-goal`, `model-optimization`, `inference-serving`, `+19 more`) - research, signals, ops, and briefings.
54- If intent belongs to another lane, hand back to `oh-my-hermes` or name the adjacent workflow.
55- Shared product, routing, compatibility, and evidence rules: `omh-routing/references/skill-common-rail.md`.
56
57## Use When
58
59Use for validator-gated research that needs durable artifacts.
60
61 Strong routing signals: `autoresearch-goal`, `research goal`, `durable research`, `critic research`
62
63## Catalog Metadata
64
65Category: `research`
66Phase: `durable-research`
67Hermes role: `researcher`
68Quality tier: `validator-gated`
69Reasoning demand: `standard`
70
71Quality bar:
72
73- Define validator criteria before gathering evidence.
74- Run each cycle as evidence-gap closure: name the open gaps the cycle targets, then stop at the validator criteria or the declared iteration budget, whichever comes first.
75- Keep durable research artifacts separate from coding execution evidence.
76- Stop with next questions or a source-backed synthesis when validation is incomplete.
77
78Handoff policy:
79
80Keep durable research in Hermes-managed artifacts; do not convert to executor handoff unless the research produces an accepted coding task.
81
82Required inputs:
83
84- research objective
85- validator criteria
86- source boundaries
87
88Expected outputs:
89
90- research artifact
91- validator result
92- next questions
93
94Artifact expectations:
95
96- durable research ledger or checklist
97
98Safety rules:
99
100- Do not imply hidden Hermes runtime behavior.
101- Use the smallest verification that can prove the claim.
102
103## Runtime Evidence
104
105Preferred harness for this skill: `research`.
106
107```sh
108omh runtime record --skill autoresearch-goal --harness research --status started
109```
110
111Record observed delegation results; otherwise return `not_available` or `not_observed`.
112Prepared OMH routing is not execution, review, CI, merge-readiness, or merge evidence.
113- Treat wrapper memory/context summaries as advisory local context, not proof of opaque Hermes memory reads or changes.
114Preserve workflow intent and stop conditions; verify before claiming completion.
115
116Use Hermes-native subagent/delegation features when available: native subagents -> Hermes delegation when available, otherwise sequential lanes.
117
118Shared product, compatibility, topology, memory, harness, and execution rules: `omh-routing/references/skill-common-rail.md`. Load it when applicable; otherwise name an unavailable capability.