People Ops
This is a Hermes-native people-ops workflow skill.
Why This Exists
people-ops keeps recruiting and people-process guidance fair, structured, and evidence bounded before any human decision or external HR action.
Do Not Use When
- The request asks for a jurisdiction-specific employment-law conclusion, policy compliance ruling, or contract interpretation; use
legal-compliance-review.
- The user only needs a one-off job-ad, rejection, or interview-email rewrite; use
content-operator.
- The user asks to create ATS records, send invitations, book interviews, change employment status, or modify HRIS settings; use
connector-operator with explicit authorization and observed results.
- The prompt asks the workflow to make an unsupported candidate decision from protected characteristics or missing interview evidence; retain the process and evidence gap instead.
Examples
Good example:
- Prompt: Create an interview scorecard and debrief plan for our first senior support hire.
- Expected behavior: Prepare role criteria, a structured scorecard, a debrief template, and decision-owner plan.
- Why: The request needs a fair hiring-process brief, not a claim that a candidate was evaluated or hired.
Bad example:
- Prompt: Send calendar invitations to every candidate for next Tuesday.
- Expected behavior: Route to
connector-operator, not people-ops.
- Why: Sending invitations is an explicit external calendar action.
Completion Checklist
- Confirm the workflow target, evidence boundary, and stop condition are named.
- Report which outputs are prepared, observed, blocked, or missing.
- Name the smallest next verification or handoff instead of claiming completion from narration.
Recovery Notes
- If required context is missing, ask one blocking question or route back to the narrower workflow.
- If runtime or wrapper evidence is unavailable, keep the status as not_observed and expose the next observable action.
Workflow Lane
- Current lane: Research and company ops (
product-docs, source-finder, web-research, research, best-practice-research, autoresearch-goal, model-optimization, inference-serving, +20 more) - research, signals, ops, and briefings.
- If intent belongs to another lane, hand back to
oh-my-hermes or name the adjacent workflow.
- Shared product, routing, compatibility, and evidence rules:
omh-routing/references/skill-common-rail.md.
Use When
Use when a team needs a role brief, hiring plan, interview rubric, candidate-debrief structure, onboarding outline, or people-process decision support.
Strong routing signals: `recruiting plan`, `hiring scorecard`, `interview scorecard`, `candidate debrief`, `채용 계획`, `면접 평가표`, `후보자 비교`
Catalog Metadata
Category: operations
Phase: people-operations
Hermes role: operator
Quality tier: evidence-gated
Reasoning demand: light
Quality bar:
- Distinguish role outcomes from proxy criteria and missing evidence.
- Keep inclusion, privacy, policy, and decision-owner gaps visible.
Handoff policy:
Keep domain framing, clarification, source/evidence synthesis, draft outputs, and next-work routing in Hermes. A prepared brief, review, reply, or plan is not an external action, approval, filing, send, publish, data mutation, implementation, review, CI, or merge claim. Prepare a connector, file, coding, or human-review handoff only when the user explicitly accepts that next step; report it only from observed evidence. Hermes can prepare fair process guidance and interview artifacts; it cannot claim a candidate was contacted, evaluated, hired, rejected, or recorded in an HR system.
Required inputs:
- role or people-process outcome
- available evidence
- decision owner
- policy constraints
Expert clarification questions:
role or people-process outcome
- English: What role or people-process outcome should this work achieve?
- Korean: 이 작업에서 어떤 역할 또는 인사 프로세스 결과를 달성해야 하나요?
Expected outputs:
- role/outcome and must-have versus trainable-criteria brief
- structured interview scorecard and evidence-based debrief template
- hiring-process, interviewer, and decision-owner plan
- inclusion, privacy, policy, and missing-evidence flags with a next route
Artifact expectations:
- prepared people-operations brief when a wrapper captures it
Safety rules:
- Keep protected characteristics and missing interview evidence out of unsupported candidate recommendations.
- Do not claim HRIS, ATS, outreach, interview, or employment-status actions occurred.
Runtime Evidence
Preferred harness for this skill: ops-review.
omh runtime record --skill people-ops --harness ops-review --status started
Record observed delegation results; otherwise return not_available or not_observed.
Prepared OMH routing is not execution, review, CI, merge-readiness, or merge evidence.
- Treat wrapper memory/context summaries as advisory local context, not proof of opaque Hermes memory reads or changes.
Preserve workflow intent and stop conditions; verify before claiming completion.
Use Hermes-native subagent/delegation features when available: native subagents -> Hermes delegation when available, otherwise sequential lanes.
Shared product, compatibility, topology, memory, harness, and execution rules: omh-routing/references/skill-common-rail.md. Load it when applicable; otherwise name an unavailable capability.
1---2name: omh-people-ops-33description: "[omh] Turn hiring and people context into a fair, structured recruiting or people-operations brief. Use when the user says: recruiting plan, hiring scorecard, interview scorecard, candidate debrief, 채용 계획, 면접 평가표, 후보자 비교."4metadata:5 hermes:6 tags: [workflow, oh-my-hermes, operations]7 category: operations8 phase: people-operations9 role: operator10 quality_tier: evidence-gated11---1213# People Ops1415This is a Hermes-native `people-ops` workflow skill.1617## Why This Exists1819`people-ops` keeps recruiting and people-process guidance fair, structured, and evidence bounded before any human decision or external HR action.2021## Do Not Use When2223- The request asks for a jurisdiction-specific employment-law conclusion, policy compliance ruling, or contract interpretation; use `legal-compliance-review`.24- The user only needs a one-off job-ad, rejection, or interview-email rewrite; use `content-operator`.25- The user asks to create ATS records, send invitations, book interviews, change employment status, or modify HRIS settings; use `connector-operator` with explicit authorization and observed results.26- The prompt asks the workflow to make an unsupported candidate decision from protected characteristics or missing interview evidence; retain the process and evidence gap instead.2728## Examples2930Good example:3132- Prompt: Create an interview scorecard and debrief plan for our first senior support hire.33- Expected behavior: Prepare role criteria, a structured scorecard, a debrief template, and decision-owner plan.34- Why: The request needs a fair hiring-process brief, not a claim that a candidate was evaluated or hired.3536Bad example:3738- Prompt: Send calendar invitations to every candidate for next Tuesday.39- Expected behavior: Route to `connector-operator`, not `people-ops`.40- Why: Sending invitations is an explicit external calendar action.4142## Completion Checklist4344- Confirm the workflow target, evidence boundary, and stop condition are named.45- Report which outputs are prepared, observed, blocked, or missing.46- Name the smallest next verification or handoff instead of claiming completion from narration.4748## Recovery Notes4950- If required context is missing, ask one blocking question or route back to the narrower workflow.51- If runtime or wrapper evidence is unavailable, keep the status as not_observed and expose the next observable action.5253## Workflow Lane5455- Current lane: **Research and company ops** (`product-docs`, `source-finder`, `web-research`, `research`, `best-practice-research`, `autoresearch-goal`, `model-optimization`, `inference-serving`, `+20 more`) - research, signals, ops, and briefings.56- If intent belongs to another lane, hand back to `oh-my-hermes` or name the adjacent workflow.57- Shared product, routing, compatibility, and evidence rules: `omh-routing/references/skill-common-rail.md`.5859## Use When6061Use when a team needs a role brief, hiring plan, interview rubric, candidate-debrief structure, onboarding outline, or people-process decision support.6263 Strong routing signals: `recruiting plan`, `hiring scorecard`, `interview scorecard`, `candidate debrief`, `채용 계획`, `면접 평가표`, `후보자 비교`6465## Catalog Metadata6667Category: `operations`68Phase: `people-operations`69Hermes role: `operator`70Quality tier: `evidence-gated`71Reasoning demand: `light`7273Quality bar:7475- Distinguish role outcomes from proxy criteria and missing evidence.76- Keep inclusion, privacy, policy, and decision-owner gaps visible.7778Handoff policy:7980Keep domain framing, clarification, source/evidence synthesis, draft outputs, and next-work routing in Hermes. A prepared brief, review, reply, or plan is not an external action, approval, filing, send, publish, data mutation, implementation, review, CI, or merge claim. Prepare a connector, file, coding, or human-review handoff only when the user explicitly accepts that next step; report it only from observed evidence. Hermes can prepare fair process guidance and interview artifacts; it cannot claim a candidate was contacted, evaluated, hired, rejected, or recorded in an HR system.8182Required inputs:8384- role or people-process outcome85- available evidence86- decision owner87- policy constraints8889Expert clarification questions:90- `role or people-process outcome`91 - English: What role or people-process outcome should this work achieve?92 - Korean: 이 작업에서 어떤 역할 또는 인사 프로세스 결과를 달성해야 하나요?9394Expected outputs:9596- role/outcome and must-have versus trainable-criteria brief97- structured interview scorecard and evidence-based debrief template98- hiring-process, interviewer, and decision-owner plan99- inclusion, privacy, policy, and missing-evidence flags with a next route100101Artifact expectations:102103- prepared people-operations brief when a wrapper captures it104105Safety rules:106107- Keep protected characteristics and missing interview evidence out of unsupported candidate recommendations.108- Do not claim HRIS, ATS, outreach, interview, or employment-status actions occurred.109110## Runtime Evidence111112Preferred harness for this skill: `ops-review`.113114```sh115omh runtime record --skill people-ops --harness ops-review --status started116```117118Record observed delegation results; otherwise return `not_available` or `not_observed`.119Prepared OMH routing is not execution, review, CI, merge-readiness, or merge evidence.120- Treat wrapper memory/context summaries as advisory local context, not proof of opaque Hermes memory reads or changes.121Preserve workflow intent and stop conditions; verify before claiming completion.122123Use Hermes-native subagent/delegation features when available: native subagents -> Hermes delegation when available, otherwise sequential lanes.124125Shared product, compatibility, topology, memory, harness, and execution rules: `omh-routing/references/skill-common-rail.md`. Load it when applicable; otherwise name an unavailable capability.