Skill Health
This is a Hermes-native skill-health workflow skill.
Why This Exists
skill-health exists so Hermes users can ask for this workflow in chat and receive a structured, evidence-bounded OMH operating surface instead of ad hoc narration.
Do Not Use When
- The request is already handled by a narrower explicit skill with stronger evidence.
- The user asks OMH to secretly run external platforms, connectors, schedulers, file exports, or runtime agents.
- The only safe answer is to ask for missing authority, credentials, target, or observed evidence first.
Examples
Good example:
- Prompt: skill-health show the OMH skill portfolio dashboard with stale surfaces, failure patterns, pending amendments, and top improvement actions.
- Expected behavior: Produce
prepare_skill_health with required context, wrapper actions, and not-evidence boundaries.
- Why: The prompt names a real workflow surface that Hermes can orchestrate without hiding execution.
Bad example:
- Prompt: skill-health claim every skill is working and patch the failures automatically without observed signals or review.
- Expected behavior: Report the missing observed evidence or authority instead of claiming the external step happened.
- Why: Prepared OMH guidance is not platform, runtime, connector, file, memory, or delivery evidence.
Completion Checklist
- Dashboard scope, source surfaces, stale/duplicate criteria, and stop condition are explicit.
- Install/setup health is routed to doctor; catalog operations are routed to skill; failure retrospectives are routed to workflow-learning.
- No skill, prompt, doc, memory, or model behavior is claimed changed until a reviewed implementation records evidence.
Recovery Notes
- If the request is about OMH setup, install, stale package paths, or command availability, route to doctor.
- If the request is a missed-route or self-improvement trace, route to workflow-learning before adding health actions.
Workflow Lane
- Current lane: Automation and status (
achievements, workspace-audit, production-audit, automation-blueprint, github-event-ops, github-issue-intake, buzz, agent-board, +35 more) - schedules, status, health, and ops review.
- If intent belongs to another lane, hand back to
oh-my-hermes or name the adjacent workflow.
- Shared product, routing, compatibility, and evidence rules:
omh-routing/references/skill-common-rail.md.
Use When
Use when operators need portfolio-level skill health without treating it as install repair, live execution success, or automatic skill mutation.
Strong routing signals: `skill-health`, `skill health`, `skill portfolio health`, `skill dashboard`, `skill health dashboard`, `skill failure pattern dashboard`, `skill failure patterns`, `pending skill amendments`, `skill amendments`, `스킬 헬스`, `스킬 상태`, `스킬 대시보드`, `스킬 실패 패턴`, `스킬 개선 후보`, `스킬 보류 수정`
Catalog Metadata
Category: operations
Phase: skill-health
Hermes role: operator
Quality tier: workflow-surface-gated
Reasoning demand: light
Quality bar:
- Name the user-facing workflow objective, required context, next action, and stop condition.
- Separate prepared guidance from observed platform, runtime, connector, file, memory, or delivery evidence.
- Expose missing tools, credentials, targets, or observations as user-visible gaps.
Handoff policy:
Keep this as Hermes-facing orchestration guidance first. Prepare executor, connector, gateway, or host-runtime handoff only when the user accepts that next step and observed evidence can be recorded.
Required inputs:
- user request
- target context
- delivery or status expectation
- known missing evidence
Expected outputs:
- catalog, generated, reference, harness, and capability-surface status
- observed failure signals, or an explicit statement that none were supplied
- pending amendment review slots and top safe actions with owner lane and verification path
Artifact expectations:
- skill_health_card/v1 metadata-only wrapper card recording surface status, observed-only failure signals, pending amendments, and the non-mutation boundary
Safety rules:
- A skill health dashboard is not install/setup health, live skill execution success, automatic skill mutation, model training, verification, review, CI, or proof that future routing is fixed.
- Do not claim connector, gateway, runtime, file generation, memory mutation, or host automation evidence from prepared guidance.
Runtime Evidence
Preferred harness for this skill: skill-health.
omh runtime record --skill skill-health --harness skill-health --status started
Record observed delegation results; otherwise return not_available or not_observed.
Prepared OMH routing is not execution, review, CI, merge-readiness, or merge evidence.
- Treat wrapper memory/context summaries as advisory local context, not proof of opaque Hermes memory reads or changes.
Preserve workflow intent and stop conditions; verify before claiming completion.
Use Hermes-native subagent/delegation features when available: native subagents -> Hermes delegation when available, otherwise sequential lanes.
Shared product, compatibility, topology, memory, harness, and execution rules: omh-routing/references/skill-common-rail.md. Load it when applicable; otherwise name an unavailable capability.
1---2name: omh-skill-health3description: [omh] Skill Health workflow: prepare a metadata-only OMH skill portfolio dashboard with stale surfaces, observed failure signals, pending amendments, and top actions. Use when the user says: skill-health, skill health, skill portfolio health, skill dashboard, skill health dashboard, skill failure pattern dashboard, skill failure patterns, pending skill amendments.4---5
6# Skill Health
7
8This is a Hermes-native `skill-health` workflow skill.
9
10## Why This Exists
11
12`skill-health` exists so Hermes users can ask for this workflow in chat and receive a structured, evidence-bounded OMH operating surface instead of ad hoc narration.
13
14## Do Not Use When
15
16- The request is already handled by a narrower explicit skill with stronger evidence.
17- The user asks OMH to secretly run external platforms, connectors, schedulers, file exports, or runtime agents.
18- The only safe answer is to ask for missing authority, credentials, target, or observed evidence first.
19
20## Examples
21
22Good example:
23
24- Prompt: skill-health show the OMH skill portfolio dashboard with stale surfaces, failure patterns, pending amendments, and top improvement actions.
25- Expected behavior: Produce `prepare_skill_health` with required context, wrapper actions, and not-evidence boundaries.
26- Why: The prompt names a real workflow surface that Hermes can orchestrate without hiding execution.
27
28Bad example:
29
30- Prompt: skill-health claim every skill is working and patch the failures automatically without observed signals or review.
31- Expected behavior: Report the missing observed evidence or authority instead of claiming the external step happened.
32- Why: Prepared OMH guidance is not platform, runtime, connector, file, memory, or delivery evidence.
33
34## Completion Checklist
35
36- Dashboard scope, source surfaces, stale/duplicate criteria, and stop condition are explicit.
37- Install/setup health is routed to doctor; catalog operations are routed to skill; failure retrospectives are routed to workflow-learning.
38- No skill, prompt, doc, memory, or model behavior is claimed changed until a reviewed implementation records evidence.
39
40## Recovery Notes
41
42- If the request is about OMH setup, install, stale package paths, or command availability, route to doctor.
43- If the request is a missed-route or self-improvement trace, route to workflow-learning before adding health actions.
44
45## Workflow Lane
46
47- Current lane: **Automation and status** (`achievements`, `workspace-audit`, `production-audit`, `automation-blueprint`, `github-event-ops`, `github-issue-intake`, `buzz`, `agent-board`, `+35 more`) - schedules, status, health, and ops review.
48- If intent belongs to another lane, hand back to `oh-my-hermes` or name the adjacent workflow.
49- Shared product, routing, compatibility, and evidence rules: `omh-routing/references/skill-common-rail.md`.
50
51## Use When
52
53Use when operators need portfolio-level skill health without treating it as install repair, live execution success, or automatic skill mutation.
54
55 Strong routing signals: `skill-health`, `skill health`, `skill portfolio health`, `skill dashboard`, `skill health dashboard`, `skill failure pattern dashboard`, `skill failure patterns`, `pending skill amendments`, `skill amendments`, `스킬 헬스`, `스킬 상태`, `스킬 대시보드`, `스킬 실패 패턴`, `스킬 개선 후보`, `스킬 보류 수정`
56
57## Catalog Metadata
58
59Category: `operations`
60Phase: `skill-health`
61Hermes role: `operator`
62Quality tier: `workflow-surface-gated`
63Reasoning demand: `light`
64
65Quality bar:
66
67- Name the user-facing workflow objective, required context, next action, and stop condition.
68- Separate prepared guidance from observed platform, runtime, connector, file, memory, or delivery evidence.
69- Expose missing tools, credentials, targets, or observations as user-visible gaps.
70
71Handoff policy:
72
73Keep this as Hermes-facing orchestration guidance first. Prepare executor, connector, gateway, or host-runtime handoff only when the user accepts that next step and observed evidence can be recorded.
74
75Required inputs:
76
77- user request
78- target context
79- delivery or status expectation
80- known missing evidence
81
82Expected outputs:
83
84- catalog, generated, reference, harness, and capability-surface status
85- observed failure signals, or an explicit statement that none were supplied
86- pending amendment review slots and top safe actions with owner lane and verification path
87
88Artifact expectations:
89
90- skill_health_card/v1 metadata-only wrapper card recording surface status, observed-only failure signals, pending amendments, and the non-mutation boundary
91
92Safety rules:
93
94- A skill health dashboard is not install/setup health, live skill execution success, automatic skill mutation, model training, verification, review, CI, or proof that future routing is fixed.
95- Do not claim connector, gateway, runtime, file generation, memory mutation, or host automation evidence from prepared guidance.
96
97## Runtime Evidence
98
99Preferred harness for this skill: `skill-health`.
100
101```sh
102omh runtime record --skill skill-health --harness skill-health --status started
103```
104
105Record observed delegation results; otherwise return `not_available` or `not_observed`.
106Prepared OMH routing is not execution, review, CI, merge-readiness, or merge evidence.
107- Treat wrapper memory/context summaries as advisory local context, not proof of opaque Hermes memory reads or changes.
108Preserve workflow intent and stop conditions; verify before claiming completion.
109
110Use Hermes-native subagent/delegation features when available: native subagents -> Hermes delegation when available, otherwise sequential lanes.
111
112Shared product, compatibility, topology, memory, harness, and execution rules: `omh-routing/references/skill-common-rail.md`. Load it when applicable; otherwise name an unavailable capability.