Support Operations
This is a Hermes-native support-operations workflow skill.
Why This Exists
support-operations turns a bounded customer case into response and escalation guidance without treating drafts or recommendations as helpdesk actions.
Do Not Use When
- The request clusters a backlog of customer signals to find product patterns or roadmap candidates; use
feedback-triage.
- The user only needs a generic, non-support marketing or email rewrite with no case, severity, or escalation context; use
content-operator.
- The request asks to send a reply, change ticket priority or status, issue a refund, modify an account, or update a helpdesk; use
connector-operator with an explicit target and observed result.
- The request is an active reliability incident or postmortem rather than a support-case response; use
reliability-review.
Examples
Good example:
- Prompt: Draft a calm reply for this login-outage customer and tell me whether it needs an engineering escalation.
- Expected behavior: Prepare a customer-safe reply, severity matrix, engineering escalation recommendation, and owner handoff.
- Why: The request is one support case with reply and escalation decisions, not a feedback backlog or ticket mutation.
Bad example:
- Prompt: Cluster last quarter's support feedback into roadmap opportunities.
- Expected behavior: Route to
feedback-triage, not support-operations.
- Why: A historical signal backlog needs product-pattern triage rather than case-level support guidance.
Completion Checklist
- The source boundary, signal clusters, severity, and follow-up lane are named.
- Bug, feature, research, strategy, and coding handoff outcomes stay separate.
- The next workflow is recommended before any implementation claim.
Recovery Notes
- If feedback lacks source or severity, ask for the missing signal before coding handoff.
- If the item is actually a plan or research request, route to that workflow instead of triage.
Workflow Lane
- Current lane: Research and company ops (
product-docs, source-finder, web-research, research, best-practice-research, autoresearch-goal, model-optimization, inference-serving, +19 more) - research, signals, ops, and briefings.
- If intent belongs to another lane, hand back to
oh-my-hermes or name the adjacent workflow.
- Shared product, routing, compatibility, and evidence rules:
omh-routing/references/skill-common-rail.md.
Use When
Use when one or a bounded set of support contacts needs response drafting, urgency classification, incident/escalation routing, and follow-up ownership.
Strong routing signals: `support escalation`, `customer support reply`, `ticket triage`, `고객 지원 에스컬레이션`, `고객 답변 초안`, `지원 티켓 분류`
Catalog Metadata
Category: triage
Phase: support-operations
Hermes role: operator
Quality tier: triage-gated
Reasoning demand: standard
Quality bar:
- State issue, severity, impact, evidence gaps, owner, and next route.
- Draft a reply without treating it as a sent customer communication.
Handoff policy:
Keep domain framing, clarification, source/evidence synthesis, draft outputs, and next-work routing in Hermes. A prepared brief, review, reply, or plan is not an external action, approval, filing, send, publish, data mutation, implementation, review, CI, or merge claim. Prepare a connector, file, coding, or human-review handoff only when the user explicitly accepts that next step; report it only from observed evidence. Reply text is a draft, escalation is a recommendation, and no ticket state, message send, refund, account action, or customer outcome is claimed.
Required inputs:
- support case
- known facts
- customer impact
- available ownership or escalation path
Expert clarification questions:
support case
- English: Which support case should we examine first?
- Korean: 어떤 지원 사례를 먼저 살펴봐야 하나요?
Expected outputs:
- customer-safe reply draft with stated facts, unknowns, and tone
- issue/severity/impact/escalation matrix
- internal next-step and owner handoff brief
- missing repro, account, entitlement, or approval evidence list
Artifact expectations:
- prepared support case brief when a wrapper captures it
Artifact contracts:
This label denotes the machine-enforcement level, not a skill quality score and not an observed evidence state.
- contract_id:
support-operations; enforcement_level: guidance_only; consumer_id: none
Safety rules:
- Keep customer-safe facts, unknowns, and escalation recommendations distinct.
- Do not claim ticket mutation, message send, refund, account action, or case outcome.
Runtime Evidence
Preferred harness for this skill: ops-review.
omh runtime record --skill support-operations --harness ops-review --status started
Record observed delegation results; otherwise return not_available or not_observed.
Prepared OMH routing is not execution, review, CI, merge-readiness, or merge evidence.
- Treat wrapper memory/context summaries as advisory local context, not proof of opaque Hermes memory reads or changes.
Preserve workflow intent and stop conditions; verify before claiming completion.
Use Hermes-native subagent/delegation features when available: native subagents -> Hermes delegation when available, otherwise sequential lanes.
Shared product, compatibility, topology, memory, harness, and execution rules: omh-routing/references/skill-common-rail.md. Load it when applicable; otherwise name an unavailable capability.
1---2name: omh-support-operations3description: [omh] Turn a support case into a clear customer reply, severity path, and owned next step. Use when the user says: support escalation, customer support reply, ticket triage, 고객 지원 에스컬레이션, 고객 답변 초안, 지원 티켓 분류.4---5
6# Support Operations
7
8This is a Hermes-native `support-operations` workflow skill.
9
10## Why This Exists
11
12`support-operations` turns a bounded customer case into response and escalation guidance without treating drafts or recommendations as helpdesk actions.
13
14## Do Not Use When
15
16- The request clusters a backlog of customer signals to find product patterns or roadmap candidates; use `feedback-triage`.
17- The user only needs a generic, non-support marketing or email rewrite with no case, severity, or escalation context; use `content-operator`.
18- The request asks to send a reply, change ticket priority or status, issue a refund, modify an account, or update a helpdesk; use `connector-operator` with an explicit target and observed result.
19- The request is an active reliability incident or postmortem rather than a support-case response; use `reliability-review`.
20
21## Examples
22
23Good example:
24
25- Prompt: Draft a calm reply for this login-outage customer and tell me whether it needs an engineering escalation.
26- Expected behavior: Prepare a customer-safe reply, severity matrix, engineering escalation recommendation, and owner handoff.
27- Why: The request is one support case with reply and escalation decisions, not a feedback backlog or ticket mutation.
28
29Bad example:
30
31- Prompt: Cluster last quarter's support feedback into roadmap opportunities.
32- Expected behavior: Route to `feedback-triage`, not `support-operations`.
33- Why: A historical signal backlog needs product-pattern triage rather than case-level support guidance.
34
35## Completion Checklist
36
37- The source boundary, signal clusters, severity, and follow-up lane are named.
38- Bug, feature, research, strategy, and coding handoff outcomes stay separate.
39- The next workflow is recommended before any implementation claim.
40
41## Recovery Notes
42
43- If feedback lacks source or severity, ask for the missing signal before coding handoff.
44- If the item is actually a plan or research request, route to that workflow instead of triage.
45
46## Workflow Lane
47
48- Current lane: **Research and company ops** (`product-docs`, `source-finder`, `web-research`, `research`, `best-practice-research`, `autoresearch-goal`, `model-optimization`, `inference-serving`, `+19 more`) - research, signals, ops, and briefings.
49- If intent belongs to another lane, hand back to `oh-my-hermes` or name the adjacent workflow.
50- Shared product, routing, compatibility, and evidence rules: `omh-routing/references/skill-common-rail.md`.
51
52## Use When
53
54Use when one or a bounded set of support contacts needs response drafting, urgency classification, incident/escalation routing, and follow-up ownership.
55
56 Strong routing signals: `support escalation`, `customer support reply`, `ticket triage`, `고객 지원 에스컬레이션`, `고객 답변 초안`, `지원 티켓 분류`
57
58## Catalog Metadata
59
60Category: `triage`
61Phase: `support-operations`
62Hermes role: `operator`
63Quality tier: `triage-gated`
64Reasoning demand: `standard`
65
66Quality bar:
67
68- State issue, severity, impact, evidence gaps, owner, and next route.
69- Draft a reply without treating it as a sent customer communication.
70
71Handoff policy:
72
73Keep domain framing, clarification, source/evidence synthesis, draft outputs, and next-work routing in Hermes. A prepared brief, review, reply, or plan is not an external action, approval, filing, send, publish, data mutation, implementation, review, CI, or merge claim. Prepare a connector, file, coding, or human-review handoff only when the user explicitly accepts that next step; report it only from observed evidence. Reply text is a draft, escalation is a recommendation, and no ticket state, message send, refund, account action, or customer outcome is claimed.
74
75Required inputs:
76
77- support case
78- known facts
79- customer impact
80- available ownership or escalation path
81
82Expert clarification questions:
83- `support case`
84 - English: Which support case should we examine first?
85 - Korean: 어떤 지원 사례를 먼저 살펴봐야 하나요?
86
87Expected outputs:
88
89- customer-safe reply draft with stated facts, unknowns, and tone
90- issue/severity/impact/escalation matrix
91- internal next-step and owner handoff brief
92- missing repro, account, entitlement, or approval evidence list
93
94Artifact expectations:
95
96- prepared support case brief when a wrapper captures it
97
98Artifact contracts:
99
100This label denotes the machine-enforcement level, not a skill quality score and not an observed evidence state.
101
102- contract_id: `support-operations`; enforcement_level: `guidance_only`; consumer_id: `none`
103
104Safety rules:
105
106- Keep customer-safe facts, unknowns, and escalation recommendations distinct.
107- Do not claim ticket mutation, message send, refund, account action, or case outcome.
108
109## Runtime Evidence
110
111Preferred harness for this skill: `ops-review`.
112
113```sh
114omh runtime record --skill support-operations --harness ops-review --status started
115```
116
117Record observed delegation results; otherwise return `not_available` or `not_observed`.
118Prepared OMH routing is not execution, review, CI, merge-readiness, or merge evidence.
119- Treat wrapper memory/context summaries as advisory local context, not proof of opaque Hermes memory reads or changes.
120Preserve workflow intent and stop conditions; verify before claiming completion.
121
122Use Hermes-native subagent/delegation features when available: native subagents -> Hermes delegation when available, otherwise sequential lanes.
123
124Shared product, compatibility, topology, memory, harness, and execution rules: `omh-routing/references/skill-common-rail.md`. Load it when applicable; otherwise name an unavailable capability.