Toolbelt Readiness
This is an OMH toolbelt-readiness workflow skill, projected for Agent Skills hosts (Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, opencode, OpenClaw, pi).
Why This Exists
toolbelt-readiness exists so Hermes users can ask for this workflow in chat and receive a structured, evidence-bounded OMH operating surface instead of ad hoc narration.
Do Not Use When
- The request is already handled by a narrower explicit skill with stronger evidence.
- The user asks OMH to secretly run external platforms, connectors, schedulers, file exports, or runtime agents.
- The only safe answer is to ask for missing authority, credentials, target, or observed evidence first.
Examples
Good example:
- Prompt: toolbelt-readiness what MCP or CLI tools do I need for weekly Linear and GitHub triage?
- Expected behavior: Produce
prepare_toolbelt_readiness with required context, wrapper actions, and not-evidence boundaries.
- Why: The prompt names a real workflow surface that Hermes can orchestrate without hiding execution.
Bad example:
- Prompt: toolbelt-readiness claim Gmail access works without an observed credential check.
- Expected behavior: Report the missing observed evidence or authority instead of claiming the external step happened.
- Why: Prepared OMH guidance is not platform, runtime, connector, file, memory, or delivery evidence.
Completion Checklist
- Confirm the workflow target, evidence boundary, and stop condition are named.
- Report which outputs are prepared, observed, blocked, or missing.
- Name the smallest next verification or handoff instead of claiming completion from narration.
Recovery Notes
- If required context is missing, ask one blocking question or route back to the narrower workflow.
- If runtime or wrapper evidence is unavailable, keep the status as not_observed and expose the next observable action.
Use When
Use when a workflow depends on MCP, CLI, API credentials, or connectors and Hermes must show installed, missing, optional, and unsafe tools.
Strong routing signals: `toolbelt-readiness`, `mcp readiness`, `tool readiness`, `plugin readiness`, `connector readiness`, `needed mcp`, `api credential`, `missing cli`, `missing plugin`, `missing connector`, `external connector`, `external tool`, `mcp server`, `mcp servers`, `mcp tool`, `mcp tools`, `toolbelt`, `github cli`, `linear cli`, `jira cli`, `notion connector`, `google drive connector`, `gmail connector`, `slack api`, `browser tool`, `image generator connector`, `mcp`, `credential`, `외부 도구`, `외부 연결`, `커넥터`, `플러그인`, `자격증명`
Catalog Metadata
Category: tools
Phase: readiness-check
Quality tier: workflow-surface-gated
Reasoning demand: standard
Quality bar:
- Name the user-facing workflow objective, required context, next action, and stop condition.
- Separate prepared guidance from observed platform, runtime, connector, file, memory, or delivery evidence.
- Expose missing tools, credentials, targets, or observations as user-visible gaps.
Required inputs:
- user request
- target context
- delivery or status expectation
- known missing evidence
Expected outputs:
- toolbelt-readiness/v1 card or guidance
- next action
- prepared-vs-observed boundary
Artifact expectations:
- toolbelt-readiness/v1 metadata-only runtime or wrapper card when recorded
Safety rules:
- A toolbelt readiness card is not MCP server installation, credential validation, API access, connector invocation, or successful workflow execution evidence.
- Do not claim connector, gateway, runtime, file generation, memory mutation, or host automation evidence from prepared guidance.
Runtime Evidence
Use the current host's own tools and subagent/task mechanism when available;
otherwise run the same lanes sequentially or name the unavailable capability.
A prepared plan, handoff, checklist, or skill installation is not execution,
review, CI, merge-readiness, or merge evidence. Report actual tool results or
not_observed / not_available; never invent dispatch or host accounting.
Treat supplied context as advisory, not proof of hidden memory reads or writes.
State scope, constraints, verification, and the stop condition before work.
Supporting paths are relative to this skill directory; sibling skill paths are
relative to its parent. Resolve them from the host-provided skill base directory
({baseDir} on hosts that provide it), never a hardcoded install location.
A named workflow not installed here is unavailable, not permission to emulate
its host-specific capabilities. Verify through the real surface before done.
1---2name: omh-toolbelt-readiness-23description: [omh] Toolbelt readiness - inventory which MCP servers, CLIs, APIs, credentials, and connectors a workflow needs; use external-connector-readiness to assess one named integration and executor-runtime-readiness to choose the coding owner. Use when the user says: toolbelt-readiness, mcp readiness, tool readiness, plugin readiness, connector readiness, needed mcp, api credential, missing cli.4---56# Toolbelt Readiness78This is an OMH `toolbelt-readiness` workflow skill, projected for Agent Skills hosts (Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, opencode, OpenClaw, pi).910## Why This Exists1112`toolbelt-readiness` exists so Hermes users can ask for this workflow in chat and receive a structured, evidence-bounded OMH operating surface instead of ad hoc narration.1314## Do Not Use When1516- The request is already handled by a narrower explicit skill with stronger evidence.17- The user asks OMH to secretly run external platforms, connectors, schedulers, file exports, or runtime agents.18- The only safe answer is to ask for missing authority, credentials, target, or observed evidence first.1920## Examples2122Good example:2324- Prompt: toolbelt-readiness what MCP or CLI tools do I need for weekly Linear and GitHub triage?25- Expected behavior: Produce `prepare_toolbelt_readiness` with required context, wrapper actions, and not-evidence boundaries.26- Why: The prompt names a real workflow surface that Hermes can orchestrate without hiding execution.2728Bad example:2930- Prompt: toolbelt-readiness claim Gmail access works without an observed credential check.31- Expected behavior: Report the missing observed evidence or authority instead of claiming the external step happened.32- Why: Prepared OMH guidance is not platform, runtime, connector, file, memory, or delivery evidence.3334## Completion Checklist3536- Confirm the workflow target, evidence boundary, and stop condition are named.37- Report which outputs are prepared, observed, blocked, or missing.38- Name the smallest next verification or handoff instead of claiming completion from narration.3940## Recovery Notes4142- If required context is missing, ask one blocking question or route back to the narrower workflow.43- If runtime or wrapper evidence is unavailable, keep the status as not_observed and expose the next observable action.44454647## Use When4849Use when a workflow depends on MCP, CLI, API credentials, or connectors and Hermes must show installed, missing, optional, and unsafe tools.5051 Strong routing signals: `toolbelt-readiness`, `mcp readiness`, `tool readiness`, `plugin readiness`, `connector readiness`, `needed mcp`, `api credential`, `missing cli`, `missing plugin`, `missing connector`, `external connector`, `external tool`, `mcp server`, `mcp servers`, `mcp tool`, `mcp tools`, `toolbelt`, `github cli`, `linear cli`, `jira cli`, `notion connector`, `google drive connector`, `gmail connector`, `slack api`, `browser tool`, `image generator connector`, `mcp`, `credential`, `외부 도구`, `외부 연결`, `커넥터`, `플러그인`, `자격증명`5253## Catalog Metadata5455Category: `tools`56Phase: `readiness-check`57Quality tier: `workflow-surface-gated`58Reasoning demand: `standard`5960Quality bar:6162- Name the user-facing workflow objective, required context, next action, and stop condition.63- Separate prepared guidance from observed platform, runtime, connector, file, memory, or delivery evidence.64- Expose missing tools, credentials, targets, or observations as user-visible gaps.6566Required inputs:6768- user request69- target context70- delivery or status expectation71- known missing evidence7273Expected outputs:7475- toolbelt-readiness/v1 card or guidance76- next action77- prepared-vs-observed boundary7879Artifact expectations:8081- toolbelt-readiness/v1 metadata-only runtime or wrapper card when recorded8283Safety rules:8485- A toolbelt readiness card is not MCP server installation, credential validation, API access, connector invocation, or successful workflow execution evidence.86- Do not claim connector, gateway, runtime, file generation, memory mutation, or host automation evidence from prepared guidance.8788## Runtime Evidence8990Use the current host's own tools and subagent/task mechanism when available;91otherwise run the same lanes sequentially or name the unavailable capability.92A prepared plan, handoff, checklist, or skill installation is not execution,93review, CI, merge-readiness, or merge evidence. Report actual tool results or94`not_observed` / `not_available`; never invent dispatch or host accounting.95Treat supplied context as advisory, not proof of hidden memory reads or writes.96State scope, constraints, verification, and the stop condition before work.97Supporting paths are relative to this skill directory; sibling skill paths are98relative to its parent. Resolve them from the host-provided skill base directory99(`{baseDir}` on hosts that provide it), never a hardcoded install location.100A named workflow not installed here is unavailable, not permission to emulate101its host-specific capabilities. Verify through the real surface before done.