Cyw

Check Your Work

Run a structured review loop on the work just completed in this conversation.

Embedded single-pass mode: when invoked from a phase gate (e.g. plan-run's Gate transition) or with the argument single-pass, run exactly one pass — Phase 1 → 2 → 3, then stop. In this mode the loop-control rules do not apply: ignore only the zero-issue stop/continue rules inside Phase 1 step 4 (still produce the numbered issue list) and the "always continue" rule (Phase 3 step 6), and skip Phase 3's full test run (step 2) — the calling gate owns the suite. But if this pass's Fix changes production code, re-run the scoped test(s) for it before returning, since the gate's test pass ran before your Fix. Everything else below applies unchanged. Standalone invocations use the full loop.

Loop control: Repeat Phases 1–3 up to 3 passes. At the start of each pass, print the header ### Pass N of 3. Stop early (before Phase 2/3) when Phase 1 finds zero issues on pass 2 or later — a clean pass 1 still requires a confirming second review. After pass 3, stop regardless of remaining issues.

Phase 1: Critical Review

1. Restate the original task in one sentence to anchor the review scope.
2. Re-read all files that were created or modified.
3. Check each change against:
   • Correctness — Does the logic do what was intended? Any bugs, wrong conditions, incorrect API usage?
   • Completeness — All requirements addressed? Files missed? Edge cases skipped?
   • Consistency — Matches existing naming conventions, patterns, and architecture?
   • Code quality — Clean, well-structured, maintainable? Any code smells or anti-patterns?
   • Integration — Correct imports? Are callers/consumers updated?
   • Tests — Existing tests still pass? New tests needed?
4. Produce a numbered list of issues found. Each issue must name the concrete harm it causes, and the form that takes depends on what was reviewed. For code: the input or condition that produces the wrong result. For prose, skills or docs: the reader who is misled and the wrong thing they do next. An observation you cannot put in either form is recorded as an observation and not fixed in Phase 2 — a review that changes things it cannot show are wrong is how a clean pass makes work worse.
   • If zero issues and this is pass 2 or later: print "No issues found — work is complete." and stop the loop.
   • If zero issues on pass 1: still continue to pass 2 (a second clean review is required to confirm).

Phase 2: Fix

Address every issue from Phase 1, stating which issue each fix resolves.

Phase 3: Verify

1. Re-read each modified file.
2. If the work involved code changes, run the relevant test command to confirm nothing is broken.
3. Confirm every Phase 1 issue is resolved.
4. Confirm the original task is fully met.
5. Write a brief summary: issues found this pass, issues fixed, any remaining concerns.
6. Always continue to the next pass unless this was pass 3. Do NOT stop here even if all issues are resolved — "all issues fixed" is not the same as "Phase 1 found zero issues". The only early-stop is after Phase 1 of pass 2 or later, when zero issues are found. If this was pass 3 and issues remain, note them as unresolved concerns and stop.