Msp Legal

{{COMPANY_NAME}} Legal Playbook

Defaults you must review. The specific numbers and negotiating positions in this skill (liability caps, indemnification stances, notice periods, termination fees, SLA credit structures, and the rest) are shipped as one MSP's negotiated example defaults, not legal advice. Review and replace them with your own, and have your own attorney approve your versions, before anything goes client-facing.

This skill is the source of truth for {{COMPANY_NAME}}'s legal document stack and its standing contract positions. It exists so that legal work is consistent: the same documents, the same clause positions, and the same escalation rules every time, instead of re-deriving them from scratch in each session.

Standing disclaimer, always in force: Claude assists with legal workflows but does not provide legal advice. {{COMPANY_NAME}} is a small business without in-house counsel, so every output in this domain is working analysis for {{OWNER_NAME}} (or the owner), and anything load-bearing (a new template, a changed clause, a signed deal with modified terms) goes to an attorney licensed in {{STATE}} before reliance. Say so in internal deliverables. Never print that disclaimer inside a client-facing contract itself.

How This Skill Divides Work With Its Siblings

• msp-legal (this skill): which documents exist, what each is for, how they fit together, {{COMPANY_NAME}}'s standing positions on contested clauses, and when to escalate to an attorney.
• msp-brand: how legal documents look and read. Full legal name in contracts, no em dashes anywhere, brand fonts and accent formatting for formatted templates. Load it before producing any formatted document.
• msp-pricing: every number and commercial term a client could see. Term lengths, the discount ladder, minimums, and rate multipliers belong to that skill; contracts must match it, never contradict it (see "Pricing rules that bind contracts" below).
• msp-sales: how contract terms are explained to a prospect. The paper is protective; the sale is warm. When a clause needs translating into plain English at signing, that is a sales task informed by this skill.
• Generic legal plugins (legal:review-contract, legal:triage-nda, legal:legal-risk-assessment, legal:compliance-check, legal:legal-response, legal:vendor-check, etc.): these supply the method (clause-by-clause review, GREEN/YELLOW/RED triage, severity-by-likelihood risk). This skill supplies the organization-specific inputs those methods ask for: the playbook positions, the acceptable ranges, and the escalation triggers. When a plugin asks for "the organization's playbook," it means references/playbook-positions.md in this skill.

First orientation question on any contract: which side is {{COMPANY_NAME}} on? On {{COMPANY_NAME}}'s own templates, {{COMPANY_NAME}} is the Provider and the paper is deliberately provider-favorable; the job is to protect that posture while removing errors, contradictions, and small-client friction. On paper someone else sends (a vendor agreement, a client's procurement template, an inbound NDA), {{COMPANY_NAME}} is the customer or recipient and the lens flips: now hunt for the same aggressive clauses {{COMPANY_NAME}} itself uses.

The Document Stack

This is the map of every legal document {{COMPANY_NAME}} needs, what each one does, and how they relate. Full per-document detail (purpose, contents, status, drafting guidance) lives in references/document-stack.md. Load that file when drafting or revising any of these, or when advising which document a situation calls for.

How the documents fit together:

NDA (optional, pre-sale)
        |
MSA  (the umbrella; every client signs it once)
 |
 +-- Service Order ......... managed services: scope, pricing, TERM, SLA targets
 +-- SOW ................... one-time projects: deliverables, price, timeline
 +-- Change Order .......... mid-flight changes to an Order or SOW
 +-- DPA / BAA addendum .... attached when the client handles regulated data
 +-- Risk Acceptance Waiver. signed when a client declines a recommendation

The architectural rule that governs everything: the MSA is the umbrella and carries no term, no pricing, and no client-specific scope. Every client signs the same MSA, whether managed, break-fix, or project-only. Commercial specifics (term commitments, the discount ladder, seat and device counts, SLA response targets) live in the Order or SOW underneath it. Never "fix" the MSA by adding term or pricing language to it.

The stack at a glance:

When a client asks "what do we need for client X," walk the stack top down: MSA always; Order or SOW depending on engagement type; DPA/BAA if regulated data; waivers as recommendations get declined.

A note on the templates: example drafts of the Service Order, SOW, Risk Acceptance Waiver, and DPA ship in the kit's templates/ folder (msp-service-order, msp-sow, msp-risk-acceptance-waiver, msp-dpa). The MSA and BAA are a to-do for you to draft with your own attorney, and every shipped draft also requires that attorney review before first use. This file describes what belongs in each document and how they relate; it is not a substitute for the signed paper.

Standing Contract Positions

{{COMPANY_NAME}}'s example negotiated positions on contested clauses (liability cap, dispute venue, the ransom clause, non-solicit, insurance, claim period, amendment mechanics, survival) live in references/playbook-positions.md. These are one MSP's negotiated positions, not legal advice. Load that file before any contract review, redline, clause question, or negotiation prep, and have your own attorney approve your versions before you rely on them. It is formatted the way legal:review-contract expects a playbook: standard position, acceptable range, and escalation trigger per clause. It also carries the open items from that review so they are not forgotten or silently re-decided.

Two rules from that file worth keeping in mind at all times:

1. Do not weaken the core protections to make a deal feel friendlier. The limitation of liability, disclaimers, client responsibilities, IP ownership, and remote-access rights are working as designed. Friction gets solved in the Order, in the conversation, or in the small set of clauses marked flexible, not by editing the MSA per client.
2. Some things are attorney-only. The non-solicit liquidated-damages figure, the overall enforceability of the liability cap, and any client-demanded change to indemnification go to an attorney licensed in {{STATE}}, full stop. Flag, do not freelance.

Rules That Bind Every Legal Document

Brand rules (from msp-brand, restated because contracts are where they bite):

• Full legal name {{COMPANY_LEGAL_NAME}} in contracts, signature blocks, and formal documents. Signature block reads "{{COMPANY_LEGAL_NAME}} (Provider)".
• No em dashes anywhere, including inside contract prose.
• Governing law is {{STATE}}.

Pricing rules that bind contracts (from msp-pricing; contracts must match the sheet):

• One year is the minimum managed-services term and the highest price shown; longer terms step down a 4% per year ladder. This lives in the Order, never the MSA. (Example default; set your own.)
• $1,000/month engagement minimum. (Example default; set your own.)
• After-hours work at 1.5x and holiday work at 2x the hourly rate. The MSA states both multipliers; any rate that appears in a contract must match the price sheet. (Example default; set your own.)
• If a contract needs a number and the number is not in msp-pricing, that is a pricing task first. Load msp-pricing; do not invent figures in legal documents.

The relationship lens (from msp-sales): {{COMPANY_NAME}} sells through trust to small clients. Provider-favorable paper and a warm sale coexist, but the clauses most likely to spook a small owner or their insurance broker (insurance burden, ransom wording, unilateral amendment, short claim windows) are exactly the ones the playbook has already right-sized. When reviewing or drafting, keep asking: would this clause survive being read aloud to the owner of a 10-person business? If not, is the protection worth the friction, and can the Order flex it instead?

Workflow Notes

• Reviewing a contract: load references/playbook-positions.md, then run the legal:review-contract method against it. Classify findings: outright errors, internal contradictions, {{STATE}} enforceability questions, conflicts with msp-pricing, and small-client friction.
• Inbound NDA: load the playbook file, then run legal:triage-nda. {{COMPANY_NAME}}'s red flags for inbound paper mirror what it right-sized in its own: embedded no-hire clauses broader than a targeted non-solicit, missing standard carveouts, exclusive venue outside {{STATE}}.
• Drafting a new template: read the relevant entry in references/document-stack.md first; it carries the standing decisions about what goes in that document and what stays out of it. Apply msp-brand formatting. Deliver clean text plus, if requested, a tracked-changes version for the attorney.
• Risk or compliance questions: legal:legal-risk-assessment and legal:compliance-check supply the framework; this skill supplies {{COMPANY_NAME}}'s escalation reality, which is simple: the escalation path is always "an attorney licensed in {{STATE}}," because there is no senior counsel.
• Formatted output: consult the docx skill for Word deliverables, save to the session's outputs or working folder (wherever the current environment delivers files to the user), and present the file. Verify zero em dashes before delivering.

Setup Decisions

The positions in references/playbook-positions.md shipped as example defaults from a working MSP, and the items below are still genuinely open. Settle all of it for your own shop, with your own attorney, before this playbook goes client-facing:

• Attorney review of the whole document stack before anything goes live. Priorities: the non-solicit liquidated-damages figure, the liability cap's overall enforceability, and a full pass on every template.
• Your own Service Order template, carrying your own minimum term and discount ladder.
• Your own DPA, if you have or expect any regulated-data client (education, healthcare-adjacent, financial, or legal). Confirm with your attorney which regimes actually apply to each such client before attaching it.
• Your own governing law, venue, and county for dispute resolution.
• Your "client's insurance primary over Provider's" flex policy: decide whether to soften it by default for small accounts or only on request, and document your choice.