Implement tasks from an OpenSpec change.
Store selection: If the user names a store (a store is a standalone OpenSpec repo registered on this machine) or the work lives in one, run openspec store list --json to discover registered store ids, then pass --store <id> on the commands that read or write specs and changes (new change, status, instructions, list, show, validate, archive, doctor, context, view). Once selected, treat --store <id> as sticky for the rest of the workflow. Every unscoped example of those commands below is shorthand: before running it, append the flag. For example, run openspec status --change "<name>" --json --store "<id>", not the unscoped form shown below. Other commands do not take the flag. Hints printed by commands already carry the flag; keep it on follow-ups. Without a store, commands act on the nearest local openspec/ root.
Input: Optionally specify a change name (e.g., $openspec-apply-change (Codex) or /openspec-apply-change (other agents) add-auth). If omitted, check if it can be inferred from conversation context. If vague or ambiguous you MUST prompt for available changes.
Steps
Select the change
If a name is provided, use it. Otherwise:
- Infer from conversation context if the user mentioned a change
- Auto-select if only one active change exists
- If ambiguous, run
openspec list --json to get available changes and ask the user to select one
Always announce: "Using change: " and how to override (e.g., $openspec-apply-change (Codex) or /openspec-apply-change (other agents) <other>).
Check status to understand the schema
openspec status --change "<name>" --json
Parse the JSON to understand:
schemaName: The workflow being used (e.g., "spec-driven")
planningHome, changeRoot, and actionContext: planning scope and edit constraints
- Which artifact contains the tasks (typically "tasks" for spec-driven, check status for others)
Get apply instructions
openspec instructions apply --change "<name>" --json
This returns:
contextFiles: artifact ID -> array of concrete file paths (varies by schema - could be proposal/specs/design/tasks or spec/tests/implementation/docs)
- Progress (total, complete, remaining)
- Task list with status
- Dynamic instruction based on current state
- Optional
context: current required project instruction input from the selected root
- Optional
operationGuidance: current advisory guidance for apply
Handle states:
- If
state: "blocked" (missing artifacts): show message, suggest using $openspec-continue-change (Codex) or /openspec-continue-change (other agents) (if it is not installed, run openspec status --change "<name>" --json to see the next artifact and openspec instructions <artifact-id> --change "<name>" --json for how to create it)
- If
state: "all_done": congratulate, suggest archive
- Otherwise: proceed to implementation
Treat context as a required prompt-level input. Read and consider it, and
apply relevant project facts, conventions, and constraints while implementing.
Treat operationGuidance as optional additive advice. Read and consider every
entry, and follow entries that are applicable and compatible with the built-in
workflow.
Keep both fields separate from CLI-returned state, missing artifacts, tasks,
progress, contextFiles, and the built-in instruction. They are not
evidence of task completion, do not replace the built-in instruction, and do
not permit bypassing a blocked state. If context conflicts with the built-in
instruction, an explicit user choice, or a CLI-controlled value, report the
conflict and preserve the controlling value. If guidance is inapplicable or
conflicts with those controlling inputs, do not follow it and explain why.
These are prompt-level behavior contracts, not enforceable checks.
Read context files
Read every file path listed under contextFiles from the apply instructions output.
The files depend on the schema being used:
- spec-driven: proposal, specs, design, tasks
- Other schemas: follow the contextFiles from CLI output
Do not copy context or operationGuidance verbatim into implementation
files or planning artifacts unless the user separately asks for that content.
Show current progress
Display:
- Schema being used
- Progress: "N/M tasks complete"
- Remaining tasks overview
- Dynamic instruction from CLI
Implement tasks (loop until done or blocked)
For each pending task:
- Show which task is being worked on
- Make the code changes required
- Keep changes minimal and focused
- Mark task complete in the tasks file:
- [ ] → - [x]
- Continue to next task
Pause if:
- Task is unclear → ask for clarification
- Implementation reveals a design issue → suggest updating artifacts
- Error or blocker encountered → report and wait for guidance
- User interrupts
On completion or pause, show status
Display:
- Tasks completed this session
- Overall progress: "N/M tasks complete"
- If all done: suggest archive
- If paused: explain why and wait for guidance
Output During Implementation
## Implementing: <change-name> (schema: <schema-name>)
Working on task 3/7: <task description>
[...implementation happening...]
✓ Task complete
Working on task 4/7: <task description>
[...implementation happening...]
✓ Task complete
Output On Completion
## Implementation Complete
**Change:** <change-name>
**Schema:** <schema-name>
**Progress:** 7/7 tasks complete ✓
### Completed This Session
- [x] Task 1
- [x] Task 2
...
All tasks complete! You can archive this change with `$openspec-archive-change (Codex) or /openspec-archive-change (other agents)`.
Output On Pause (Issue Encountered)
## Implementation Paused
**Change:** <change-name>
**Schema:** <schema-name>
**Progress:** 4/7 tasks complete
### Issue Encountered
<description of the issue>
**Options:**
1. <option 1>
2. <option 2>
3. Other approach
What would you like to do?
Guardrails
- Keep going through tasks until done or blocked
- Always read context files before starting (from the apply instructions output)
- If task is ambiguous, pause and ask before implementing
- If implementation reveals issues, pause and suggest artifact updates
- Keep code changes minimal and scoped to each task
- Update task checkbox immediately after completing each task
- Pause on errors, blockers, or unclear requirements - don't guess
- Use contextFiles from CLI output, don't assume specific file names
- Do not use context or operation guidance as proof that a task is complete
- Apply relevant project context; report conflicts with controlling workflow inputs
- Consider every guidance entry; explain any inapplicable or conflicting advice
- Do not copy runtime context or operation guidance into implementation files or planning artifacts
- Preserve CLI-controlled blocked/ready/all-done behavior and completion criteria
Fluid Workflow Integration
This skill supports the "actions on a change" model:
- Can be invoked anytime: Before all artifacts are done (if tasks exist), after partial implementation, interleaved with other actions
- Allows artifact updates: If implementation reveals design issues, suggest updating artifacts - not phase-locked, work fluidly
1---2name: openspec-apply-change3description: Implement tasks from an OpenSpec change. Use when the user wants to start implementing, continue implementation, or work through tasks.4license: MIT5---67Implement tasks from an OpenSpec change.89**Store selection:** If the user names a store (a store is a standalone OpenSpec repo registered on this machine) or the work lives in one, run `openspec store list --json` to discover registered store ids, then pass `--store <id>` on the commands that read or write specs and changes (`new change`, `status`, `instructions`, `list`, `show`, `validate`, `archive`, `doctor`, `context`, `view`). Once selected, treat `--store <id>` as sticky for the rest of the workflow. Every unscoped example of those commands below is shorthand: before running it, append the flag. For example, run `openspec status --change "<name>" --json --store "<id>"`, not the unscoped form shown below. Other commands do not take the flag. Hints printed by commands already carry the flag; keep it on follow-ups. Without a store, commands act on the nearest local `openspec/` root.1011**Input**: Optionally specify a change name (e.g., `$openspec-apply-change (Codex) or /openspec-apply-change (other agents) add-auth`). If omitted, check if it can be inferred from conversation context. If vague or ambiguous you MUST prompt for available changes.1213**Steps**14151. **Select the change**1617 If a name is provided, use it. Otherwise:18 - Infer from conversation context if the user mentioned a change19 - Auto-select if only one active change exists20 - If ambiguous, run `openspec list --json` to get available changes and ask the user to select one2122 Always announce: "Using change: <name>" and how to override (e.g., `$openspec-apply-change (Codex) or /openspec-apply-change (other agents) <other>`).23242. **Check status to understand the schema**2526 ```bash27 openspec status --change "<name>" --json28 ```2930 Parse the JSON to understand:31 - `schemaName`: The workflow being used (e.g., "spec-driven")32 - `planningHome`, `changeRoot`, and `actionContext`: planning scope and edit constraints33 - Which artifact contains the tasks (typically "tasks" for spec-driven, check status for others)34353. **Get apply instructions**3637 ```bash38 openspec instructions apply --change "<name>" --json39 ```4041 This returns:42 - `contextFiles`: artifact ID -> array of concrete file paths (varies by schema - could be proposal/specs/design/tasks or spec/tests/implementation/docs)43 - Progress (total, complete, remaining)44 - Task list with status45 - Dynamic instruction based on current state46 - Optional `context`: current required project instruction input from the selected root47 - Optional `operationGuidance`: current advisory guidance for apply4849 **Handle states:**50 - If `state: "blocked"` (missing artifacts): show message, suggest using `$openspec-continue-change (Codex) or /openspec-continue-change (other agents)` (if it is not installed, run `openspec status --change "<name>" --json` to see the next artifact and `openspec instructions <artifact-id> --change "<name>" --json` for how to create it)51 - If `state: "all_done"`: congratulate, suggest archive52 - Otherwise: proceed to implementation5354 Treat `context` as a required prompt-level input. Read and consider it, and55 apply relevant project facts, conventions, and constraints while implementing.56 Treat `operationGuidance` as optional additive advice. Read and consider every57 entry, and follow entries that are applicable and compatible with the built-in58 workflow.5960 Keep both fields separate from CLI-returned state, missing artifacts, tasks,61 progress, `contextFiles`, and the built-in `instruction`. They are not62 evidence of task completion, do not replace the built-in instruction, and do63 not permit bypassing a blocked state. If context conflicts with the built-in64 instruction, an explicit user choice, or a CLI-controlled value, report the65 conflict and preserve the controlling value. If guidance is inapplicable or66 conflicts with those controlling inputs, do not follow it and explain why.67 These are prompt-level behavior contracts, not enforceable checks.68694. **Read context files**7071 Read every file path listed under `contextFiles` from the apply instructions output.72 The files depend on the schema being used:73 - **spec-driven**: proposal, specs, design, tasks74 - Other schemas: follow the contextFiles from CLI output7576 Do not copy `context` or `operationGuidance` verbatim into implementation77 files or planning artifacts unless the user separately asks for that content.78795. **Show current progress**8081 Display:82 - Schema being used83 - Progress: "N/M tasks complete"84 - Remaining tasks overview85 - Dynamic instruction from CLI86876. **Implement tasks (loop until done or blocked)**8889 For each pending task:90 - Show which task is being worked on91 - Make the code changes required92 - Keep changes minimal and focused93 - Mark task complete in the tasks file: `- [ ]` → `- [x]`94 - Continue to next task9596 **Pause if:**97 - Task is unclear → ask for clarification98 - Implementation reveals a design issue → suggest updating artifacts99 - Error or blocker encountered → report and wait for guidance100 - User interrupts1011027. **On completion or pause, show status**103104 Display:105 - Tasks completed this session106 - Overall progress: "N/M tasks complete"107 - If all done: suggest archive108 - If paused: explain why and wait for guidance109110**Output During Implementation**111112```plain113## Implementing: <change-name> (schema: <schema-name>)114115Working on task 3/7: <task description>116[...implementation happening...]117✓ Task complete118119Working on task 4/7: <task description>120[...implementation happening...]121✓ Task complete122```123124**Output On Completion**125126```plain127## Implementation Complete128129**Change:** <change-name>130**Schema:** <schema-name>131**Progress:** 7/7 tasks complete ✓132133### Completed This Session134- [x] Task 1135- [x] Task 2136...137138All tasks complete! You can archive this change with `$openspec-archive-change (Codex) or /openspec-archive-change (other agents)`.139```140141**Output On Pause (Issue Encountered)**142143```plain144## Implementation Paused145146**Change:** <change-name>147**Schema:** <schema-name>148**Progress:** 4/7 tasks complete149150### Issue Encountered151<description of the issue>152153**Options:**1541. <option 1>1552. <option 2>1563. Other approach157158What would you like to do?159```160161**Guardrails**162163- Keep going through tasks until done or blocked164- Always read context files before starting (from the apply instructions output)165- If task is ambiguous, pause and ask before implementing166- If implementation reveals issues, pause and suggest artifact updates167- Keep code changes minimal and scoped to each task168- Update task checkbox immediately after completing each task169- Pause on errors, blockers, or unclear requirements - don't guess170- Use contextFiles from CLI output, don't assume specific file names171- Do not use context or operation guidance as proof that a task is complete172- Apply relevant project context; report conflicts with controlling workflow inputs173- Consider every guidance entry; explain any inapplicable or conflicting advice174- Do not copy runtime context or operation guidance into implementation files or planning artifacts175- Preserve CLI-controlled blocked/ready/all-done behavior and completion criteria176177**Fluid Workflow Integration**178179This skill supports the "actions on a change" model:180181- **Can be invoked anytime**: Before all artifacts are done (if tasks exist), after partial implementation, interleaved with other actions182- **Allows artifact updates**: If implementation reveals design issues, suggest updating artifacts - not phase-locked, work fluidly