Delegate
Help the user decide: should this task be fully automated, AI-assisted, or
kept human? Not everything should be automated. This skill provides a
structured decision framework.
When to Activate
Manual triggers:
- "Should I automate this?"
- "AI or human?"
- "Can Claude do this, or should I?"
- "Delegate this"
- "Is this worth automating?"
Auto-detect triggers:
- User hesitates about whether to automate something
- User describes a task with mixed automation potential (partly automatable,
partly needs judgment)
- User asks "can Claude handle this?" about a task with ambiguous complexity
The Evaluation Framework
For each task, evaluate across five dimensions. Score each 1-5.
1. Repetitiveness (1-5)
How often does this task recur with a similar pattern?
- 5 = Daily or more, nearly identical each time
- 4 = Weekly, same structure with minor variations
- 3 = Monthly, moderate variations
- 2 = Quarterly or irregular, significant variations
- 1 = One-off or rarely recurring
2. Judgment Required (1-5, inverted — high score = low judgment)
How much human judgment, creativity, or nuance is needed?
- 5 = Zero judgment — purely mechanical (data formatting, file conversion)
- 4 = Minimal judgment — clear rules cover 90%+ of cases
- 3 = Moderate judgment — some edge cases need human review
- 2 = Significant judgment — context-dependent decisions
- 1 = Deep judgment — requires empathy, politics, creativity, or taste
3. Error Tolerance (1-5)
What happens if the automation gets it wrong?
- 5 = Errors are trivially fixable, no consequences
- 4 = Errors cause minor inconvenience, easily caught
- 3 = Errors are noticeable, require some cleanup
- 2 = Errors cause real problems — wrong data sent, incorrect decisions
- 1 = Errors are catastrophic — legal, financial, safety, or reputational damage
4. Data Sensitivity (1-5, inverted — high score = low sensitivity)
How sensitive is the data involved?
- 5 = Public or non-sensitive data
- 4 = Internal but non-confidential
- 3 = Business-confidential
- 2 = Personally identifiable information (PII) or financial data
- 1 = Regulated data (HIPAA, SOX, classified) or credentials
5. Current Time Cost (1-5)
How much time does this task consume?
- 5 = Multiple hours per occurrence
- 4 = 1-2 hours per occurrence
- 3 = 30-60 minutes per occurrence
- 2 = 15-30 minutes per occurrence
- 1 = Under 15 minutes per occurrence
The Decision Matrix
Calculate the Delegation Score = average of all five dimensions.
| Score Range |
Recommendation |
What It Means |
| 4.0-5.0 |
AUTOMATE FULLY |
Build it and forget it. No human in the loop. |
| 3.0-3.9 |
AI-ASSIST |
Claude does the heavy lifting, human reviews before finalizing. |
| 2.0-2.9 |
HUMAN + AI TOOLS |
Human drives, Claude is a tool (research, drafting, analysis). |
| 1.0-1.9 |
KEEP HUMAN |
This task needs human judgment, empathy, or accountability. Don't automate. |
Output Format
Present the evaluation as:
# Delegation Assessment: [Task Name]
## Scores
| Dimension | Score | Reasoning |
|---|---|---|
| Repetitiveness | X/5 | [One sentence why] |
| Judgment Required | X/5 | [One sentence why] |
| Error Tolerance | X/5 | [One sentence why] |
| Data Sensitivity | X/5 | [One sentence why] |
| Current Time Cost | X/5 | [One sentence why] |
## Delegation Score: X.X/5
## Recommendation: [AUTOMATE FULLY / AI-ASSIST / HUMAN + AI TOOLS / KEEP HUMAN]
### Why
[2-3 sentences explaining the recommendation, highlighting the dimension(s)
that most influenced the decision]
### If Automating
[Specific recommendation for how to automate, what tools to use]
### If Keeping Human
[What the human should focus on, and where AI can still help at the margins]
### Risk to Watch
[The single biggest risk of following this recommendation, and how to mitigate it]
Rules
Never recommend full automation for tasks scoring below 2 on Error Tolerance
or Data Sensitivity. Some tasks are too risky regardless of other scores.
Be honest when automation isn't the answer. Saying "keep this human" is a
valid, valuable recommendation. Don't force automation where it doesn't fit.
When recommending AI-ASSIST, be specific about the split. "Claude drafts,
you review" is better than "use AI to help."
Consider the user's technical level. A non-technical user can't maintain a
custom Python script. Recommend tools they can actually use.
If the scores are borderline (e.g., 2.8-3.2), present both options and let
the user decide. Acknowledge the ambiguity.
Chaining
- automate-audit → delegate: When the audit surfaces a task, use delegate
to decide if it should actually be automated
- delegate → decompose: If the recommendation is AI-ASSIST, decompose the
task to find which sub-steps are automatable
- delegate → prompt-architect: If the recommendation is AUTOMATE, build the
prompt to do it
1---2name: delegate3description: Decision framework that evaluates any task against criteria (repetitiveness, judgment required, error tolerance, data sensitivity) and recommends whether to automate fully, AI-assist, or keep human. Activates when the user asks "should I automate this?", "delegate this?", "AI or human?", or when they're unsure whether a task belongs in an automation pipeline.4---56# Delegate78Help the user decide: should this task be fully automated, AI-assisted, or9kept human? Not everything should be automated. This skill provides a10structured decision framework.1112## When to Activate1314**Manual triggers:**15- "Should I automate this?"16- "AI or human?"17- "Can Claude do this, or should I?"18- "Delegate this"19- "Is this worth automating?"2021**Auto-detect triggers:**22- User hesitates about whether to automate something23- User describes a task with mixed automation potential (partly automatable,24 partly needs judgment)25- User asks "can Claude handle this?" about a task with ambiguous complexity2627## The Evaluation Framework2829For each task, evaluate across five dimensions. Score each 1-5.3031### 1. Repetitiveness (1-5)32How often does this task recur with a similar pattern?33- 5 = Daily or more, nearly identical each time34- 4 = Weekly, same structure with minor variations35- 3 = Monthly, moderate variations36- 2 = Quarterly or irregular, significant variations37- 1 = One-off or rarely recurring3839### 2. Judgment Required (1-5, inverted — high score = low judgment)40How much human judgment, creativity, or nuance is needed?41- 5 = Zero judgment — purely mechanical (data formatting, file conversion)42- 4 = Minimal judgment — clear rules cover 90%+ of cases43- 3 = Moderate judgment — some edge cases need human review44- 2 = Significant judgment — context-dependent decisions45- 1 = Deep judgment — requires empathy, politics, creativity, or taste4647### 3. Error Tolerance (1-5)48What happens if the automation gets it wrong?49- 5 = Errors are trivially fixable, no consequences50- 4 = Errors cause minor inconvenience, easily caught51- 3 = Errors are noticeable, require some cleanup52- 2 = Errors cause real problems — wrong data sent, incorrect decisions53- 1 = Errors are catastrophic — legal, financial, safety, or reputational damage5455### 4. Data Sensitivity (1-5, inverted — high score = low sensitivity)56How sensitive is the data involved?57- 5 = Public or non-sensitive data58- 4 = Internal but non-confidential59- 3 = Business-confidential60- 2 = Personally identifiable information (PII) or financial data61- 1 = Regulated data (HIPAA, SOX, classified) or credentials6263### 5. Current Time Cost (1-5)64How much time does this task consume?65- 5 = Multiple hours per occurrence66- 4 = 1-2 hours per occurrence67- 3 = 30-60 minutes per occurrence68- 2 = 15-30 minutes per occurrence69- 1 = Under 15 minutes per occurrence7071## The Decision Matrix7273Calculate the **Delegation Score** = average of all five dimensions.7475| Score Range | Recommendation | What It Means |76|---|---|---|77| 4.0-5.0 | **AUTOMATE FULLY** | Build it and forget it. No human in the loop. |78| 3.0-3.9 | **AI-ASSIST** | Claude does the heavy lifting, human reviews before finalizing. |79| 2.0-2.9 | **HUMAN + AI TOOLS** | Human drives, Claude is a tool (research, drafting, analysis). |80| 1.0-1.9 | **KEEP HUMAN** | This task needs human judgment, empathy, or accountability. Don't automate. |8182## Output Format8384Present the evaluation as:8586```87# Delegation Assessment: [Task Name]8889## Scores90| Dimension | Score | Reasoning |91|---|---|---|92| Repetitiveness | X/5 | [One sentence why] |93| Judgment Required | X/5 | [One sentence why] |94| Error Tolerance | X/5 | [One sentence why] |95| Data Sensitivity | X/5 | [One sentence why] |96| Current Time Cost | X/5 | [One sentence why] |9798## Delegation Score: X.X/599100## Recommendation: [AUTOMATE FULLY / AI-ASSIST / HUMAN + AI TOOLS / KEEP HUMAN]101102### Why103[2-3 sentences explaining the recommendation, highlighting the dimension(s)104that most influenced the decision]105106### If Automating107[Specific recommendation for how to automate, what tools to use]108109### If Keeping Human110[What the human should focus on, and where AI can still help at the margins]111112### Risk to Watch113[The single biggest risk of following this recommendation, and how to mitigate it]114```115116## Rules1171181. Never recommend full automation for tasks scoring below 2 on Error Tolerance119 or Data Sensitivity. Some tasks are too risky regardless of other scores.1201212. Be honest when automation isn't the answer. Saying "keep this human" is a122 valid, valuable recommendation. Don't force automation where it doesn't fit.1231243. When recommending AI-ASSIST, be specific about the split. "Claude drafts,125 you review" is better than "use AI to help."1261274. Consider the user's technical level. A non-technical user can't maintain a128 custom Python script. Recommend tools they can actually use.1291305. If the scores are borderline (e.g., 2.8-3.2), present both options and let131 the user decide. Acknowledge the ambiguity.132133## Chaining134135- **automate-audit → delegate:** When the audit surfaces a task, use delegate136 to decide if it should actually be automated137- **delegate → decompose:** If the recommendation is AI-ASSIST, decompose the138 task to find which sub-steps are automatable139- **delegate → prompt-architect:** If the recommendation is AUTOMATE, build the140 prompt to do it