MITRE ATT&CK T1213.001: Confluence
When to use this skill
Use this skill when the task involves T1213.001, Confluence, enterprise ATT&CK, TTP mapping, detection engineering, hunting, incident-response enrichment, control validation, or authorized adversary-emulation planning. Treat it as a defensive analysis aid: keep outputs focused on understanding, detecting, mitigating, and safely validating this ATT&CK sub-technique.
Technique context
- ATT&CK domain: enterprise
- ATT&CK ID: T1213.001
- Technique name: Confluence
- Type: sub-technique
- ATT&CK URL: https://attack.mitre.org/techniques/T1213/001
- Tactics: collection
- Platforms: SaaS
- Required permissions: Not specified
- Effective permissions: Not specified
- Defenses bypassed: Not specified
ATT&CK description
Adversaries may leverage Confluence repositories to mine valuable information. Often found in development environments alongside Atlassian JIRA, Confluence is generally used to store development-related documentation, however, in general may contain more diverse categories of useful information, such as:
- Policies, procedures, and standards
- Physical / logical network diagrams
- System architecture diagrams
- Technical system documentation
- Testing / development credentials (i.e., Unsecured Credentials)
- Work / project schedules
- Source code snippets
- Links to network shares and other internal resources
Agent workflow
- Clarify scope: identify the system, asset class, log sources, cloud or endpoint platform, and whether the user wants triage, detection, coverage assessment, or safe emulation planning.
- Load bundled resources as needed: use
references/technique-profile.json for structured metadata, references/detection-and-mitigation.md for triage and telemetry guidance, references/known-threat-context.md for ATT&CK relationship context, and templates/ for repeatable outputs.
- Map observations to ATT&CK: compare the user's evidence to the ATT&CK description, tactics, platforms, and known procedure patterns before asserting a match.
- Produce defensive outputs: prioritize hypotheses, telemetry requirements, detection logic ideas, validation steps, containment guidance, and mitigations.
- Preserve uncertainty: distinguish confirmed evidence, plausible indicators, assumptions, and gaps. Recommend what to collect next.
- Stay safe: do not provide malware, credential theft, persistence, evasion, destructive automation, or unauthorized exploitation instructions. For adversary emulation, keep steps bounded to approved lab or control-validation contexts and omit operational abuse details.
Bundled resources
references/technique-profile.json: machine-readable ATT&CK metadata for this technique.
references/detection-and-mitigation.md: detection notes, telemetry checklist, triage questions, mitigation candidates, and false-positive considerations.
references/known-threat-context.md: ATT&CK relationship context with attribution cautions.
templates/detection-brief.md: detection engineering brief template.
templates/hunt-plan.md: threat hunt plan template.
templates/incident-response-note.md: incident response note template.
templates/coverage-assessment.md: ATT&CK coverage assessment template.
scripts/render_brief.py: local helper that renders a Markdown defensive brief from technique-profile.json.
assets/output-schema.json: JSON schema for structured technique analysis outputs.
To generate a quick brief, run python scripts/render_brief.py --output brief.md from inside this skill directory, or adapt the templates directly.
Detection guidance
No ATT&CK detection guidance was present in the source STIX object.
Useful telemetry and data sources
- Not specified in the STIX object.
Mitigations to consider
- Audit
- User Account Management
- User Training
Known threat context
Use these examples only as contextual leads, not as proof that an observed event is this technique:
- LAPSUS$ (intrusion-set)
- TruffleHog (tool)
Recommended output pattern
When responding with this skill, structure the answer as:
- Assessment: whether the evidence supports this ATT&CK mapping and why.
- Evidence: specific indicators, logs, behaviors, and assumptions.
- Detection: telemetry sources, analytic logic, and tuning considerations.
- Response: containment, eradication, recovery, and validation actions.
- Coverage gaps: missing logs, sensors, controls, or environmental details.
- References: include the ATT&CK URL and any user-provided evidence references.
1---2name: attack-ent-t1213-001-confluence3description: Analyze MITRE ATT&CK T1213.001 Confluence in the enterprise matrix. Use for TTP triage, detection engineering, hunting, defensive emulation planning, mitigations, incident response mapping, ATT&CK coverage, or questions mentioning T1213.001, Confluence, or enterprise ATT&CK. Adversaries may leverage Confluence repositories to mine valuable information.4license: MITRE ATT&CK Terms of Use apply to ATT&CK-derived content. See h5---67# MITRE ATT&CK T1213.001: Confluence89## When to use this skill1011Use this skill when the task involves T1213.001, Confluence, enterprise ATT&CK, TTP mapping, detection engineering, hunting, incident-response enrichment, control validation, or authorized adversary-emulation planning. Treat it as a defensive analysis aid: keep outputs focused on understanding, detecting, mitigating, and safely validating this ATT&CK sub-technique.1213## Technique context1415- ATT&CK domain: enterprise16- ATT&CK ID: T1213.00117- Technique name: Confluence18- Type: sub-technique19- ATT&CK URL: https://attack.mitre.org/techniques/T1213/00120- Tactics: collection21- Platforms: SaaS22- Required permissions: Not specified23- Effective permissions: Not specified24- Defenses bypassed: Not specified2526## ATT&CK description2728Adversaries may leverage Confluence repositories to mine valuable information. Often found in development environments alongside Atlassian JIRA, Confluence is generally used to store development-related documentation, however, in general may contain more diverse categories of useful information, such as:2930* Policies, procedures, and standards31* Physical / logical network diagrams32* System architecture diagrams33* Technical system documentation34* Testing / development credentials (i.e., [Unsecured Credentials](https://attack.mitre.org/techniques/T1552))35* Work / project schedules36* Source code snippets37* Links to network shares and other internal resources3839## Agent workflow40411. Clarify scope: identify the system, asset class, log sources, cloud or endpoint platform, and whether the user wants triage, detection, coverage assessment, or safe emulation planning.422. Load bundled resources as needed: use `references/technique-profile.json` for structured metadata, `references/detection-and-mitigation.md` for triage and telemetry guidance, `references/known-threat-context.md` for ATT&CK relationship context, and `templates/` for repeatable outputs.433. Map observations to ATT&CK: compare the user's evidence to the ATT&CK description, tactics, platforms, and known procedure patterns before asserting a match.444. Produce defensive outputs: prioritize hypotheses, telemetry requirements, detection logic ideas, validation steps, containment guidance, and mitigations.455. Preserve uncertainty: distinguish confirmed evidence, plausible indicators, assumptions, and gaps. Recommend what to collect next.466. Stay safe: do not provide malware, credential theft, persistence, evasion, destructive automation, or unauthorized exploitation instructions. For adversary emulation, keep steps bounded to approved lab or control-validation contexts and omit operational abuse details.4748## Bundled resources4950- `references/technique-profile.json`: machine-readable ATT&CK metadata for this technique.51- `references/detection-and-mitigation.md`: detection notes, telemetry checklist, triage questions, mitigation candidates, and false-positive considerations.52- `references/known-threat-context.md`: ATT&CK relationship context with attribution cautions.53- `templates/detection-brief.md`: detection engineering brief template.54- `templates/hunt-plan.md`: threat hunt plan template.55- `templates/incident-response-note.md`: incident response note template.56- `templates/coverage-assessment.md`: ATT&CK coverage assessment template.57- `scripts/render_brief.py`: local helper that renders a Markdown defensive brief from `technique-profile.json`.58- `assets/output-schema.json`: JSON schema for structured technique analysis outputs.5960To generate a quick brief, run `python scripts/render_brief.py --output brief.md` from inside this skill directory, or adapt the templates directly.6162## Detection guidance6364No ATT&CK detection guidance was present in the source STIX object.6566## Useful telemetry and data sources6768- Not specified in the STIX object.6970## Mitigations to consider7172- Audit73- User Account Management74- User Training7576## Known threat context7778Use these examples only as contextual leads, not as proof that an observed event is this technique:7980- LAPSUS$ (intrusion-set)81- TruffleHog (tool)8283## Recommended output pattern8485When responding with this skill, structure the answer as:8687- Assessment: whether the evidence supports this ATT&CK mapping and why.88- Evidence: specific indicators, logs, behaviors, and assumptions.89- Detection: telemetry sources, analytic logic, and tuning considerations.90- Response: containment, eradication, recovery, and validation actions.91- Coverage gaps: missing logs, sensors, controls, or environmental details.92- References: include the ATT&CK URL and any user-provided evidence references.