Spec Interview

Skill: Spec Interview

Purpose

Interview the user in depth about what they want to build, then produce a complete specification in the project's specs directory: one spec per file, never a single overwritten SPEC.md.

Location and naming

1. Read flux-config.yml at the project root: specs.dir gives the directory (default: specs/). Create it if missing.
2. Determine the <ref>:
   • if the spec starts from an existing GitHub issue → its number: SPEC-42.md;
   • otherwise → a short, stable kebab slug: SPEC-candidate-pipeline.md. The ref never changes once the file exists (even if an issue is opened later; it is then recorded in the frontmatter instead).
3. If a file already exists for this ref, update it rather than creating a second one.

Phase 1: Interview

Use AskUserQuestion. Dig into the hard parts:

• Implementation: stack, data model, APIs, integrations, constraints
• UI/UX: flows, states, edge cases in the interface
• Business rules: the exact rules, who decides, what changes them
• Edge cases: what happens when X is missing, null, concurrent, invalid
• Tradeoffs: performance vs simplicity, flexibility vs consistency, now vs later
• Concerns: what worries the user, what is uncertain

Do not ask obvious questions. Go straight to the points the user has probably not considered. 3 to 6 rounds of questions, grouped by theme (max 4 questions per call).

Stop when: implementation could start without further clarification, edge cases and tradeoffs are documented, acceptance criteria are clear.

Phase 2: Write the spec

Write <specs.dir>/SPEC-<ref>.md:

---
title: [Feature name]
ref: [ref]
status: draft        # draft | validated | implemented
issue:               # #N once the issue is created
date: [YYYY-MM-DD]
---

# Spec: [Feature name]

## Overview
[2-3 sentences: what, why, scope]

## Goals
- [Concrete, measurable goal]

## Non-goals
- [Explicitly out of scope]

## User flows
### [Flow name]
1. …

## Data model
[Tables / fields / relationships; only what is new or changed]

## API / Routes
[Method, path, auth, request, response, errors]

## Business rules
- …

## Edge cases
- [What happens when X]

## UI / UX
[Key screens, error states, empty states]

## Technical decisions & tradeoffs
| Decision | Choice | Rationale |

## Open questions
- [ ] …

## Acceptance criteria
- [ ] …

Omit sections that do not apply; add sections if needed.

Phase 3: Index and next step

1. Maintain <specs.dir>/README.md: a table | Ref | Title | Status | Issue | File |. Add or update this spec's row.
2. Tell the user where the file is and what remains open.
3. When the user validates the spec: set status: validated, then offer to chain into /gh-issue to create the linked GitHub issue. status: implemented is set when the corresponding PR is merged.