Letter of Intent
When to use this
Use this skill when parties to a significant transaction want to record their preliminary agreement on key terms before investing in full due diligence and definitive documentation. The LOI signals mutual commitment, provides a negotiating framework, and typically triggers exclusivity.
Triggers:
- "Draft an LOI for the acquisition of [Target]."
- "We've agreed in principle on a JV — write up the heads of terms."
- "Draft a non-binding letter of intent with an exclusivity period of 60 days."
LOI vs MOU: An LOI is typically more transaction-specific and shorter; an MOU is more common for collaborations and government/institutional relationships. Both serve to capture preliminary agreement. Use [[prompt-pack-memorandum-of-understanding]] if the context is a collaboration or institutional arrangement rather than a commercial transaction.
Required inputs
| Input |
Why it matters |
Default |
| Transaction type |
M&A / JV / strategic partnership / real estate acquisition |
Ask user |
| Party A and Party B names |
Identifies the parties |
Ask user |
| Key commercial terms |
Purchase price, ownership percentages, consideration structure |
Ask user |
| Exclusivity period |
Duration of exclusivity from signing |
45–60 days is typical; ask user |
| Due diligence scope |
What DD is contemplated in the pre-definitive phase |
Ask user |
| Governing law |
Determines enforceability of binding provisions |
Jurisdiction of target or DIFC/ADGM for cross-border |
Optional inputs
- Break fee / termination fee if exclusivity is breached
- Financing condition (if buyer requires debt/equity financing to close)
- Conditions to signing definitive agreement
- Management continuity or retention requirements
- Employee consultation obligations (if regulated merger)
- Board approval conditions
Document structure
1. Introduction
- Date and parties (full legal names)
- Brief description of the proposed transaction
- Statement that this LOI is intended to summarize the key terms and does not constitute a binding agreement except as expressly stated
2. Transaction Structure
- Type: acquisition of shares / assets / merger / JV
- Target: description of the business or asset being acquired / invested in
- Buyer / Investor / JV Parties: identity
- Consideration: purchase price or JV equity split; payment structure (cash, shares, deferred, earnout)
- Financing assumption: whether the transaction is subject to financing
3. Key Commercial Terms
Summarize the agreed economic terms:
- Valuation / headline price
- Payment mechanics: upfront vs staged; escrow / holdback arrangements
- Earnout conditions (if any): metric, period, calculation methodology
- Working capital adjustment mechanism
- Representations and warranties: scope expected in the definitive agreement
- Indemnification: general framework (time limits, caps, baskets)
4. Conditions to Signing Definitive Agreements
List conditions that must be satisfied before a definitive agreement can be signed:
- Satisfactory completion of due diligence by Buyer
- Approval by boards of directors of both parties
- Receipt of required regulatory approvals (competition/merger control, foreign investment approvals)
- Resolution of material issues identified in due diligence
5. Exclusivity (BINDING)
This clause is typically binding:
- Duration: [45 / 60 / 90] days from date of LOI
- Scope: Target and its shareholders / agents will not solicit, negotiate, or conclude an agreement with any other party regarding a competing transaction
- Extension: may be extended by mutual written agreement
- Effect of breach: Buyer may seek injunctive relief and/or a break fee
6. Confidentiality (BINDING)
- Cross-reference any existing NDA or state that a separate NDA is in effect
- If no NDA exists, include a standalone confidentiality clause binding on both parties
- This clause is typically binding even if the rest of the LOI is non-binding
7. Due Diligence Process
- Scope of DD: legal, financial, technical, commercial, tax, environmental, HR
- Access: Target agrees to provide reasonable access to management, documents, and data room
- Timing: DD to be completed within [X] days of LOI signing
- DD reports: Buyer to share summary findings that would require price adjustment
8. Path to Definitive Agreement
- Timeline: parties aim to sign a definitive agreement by [date]
- Documentation: identify the key documents to be negotiated (SPA / MFA / JV Agreement / SHA)
- Counsel: identify lead counsel for each party
9. Non-Binding Nature (IMPORTANT)
State clearly and prominently: "This Letter of Intent is not a binding agreement and creates no legal obligation to consummate the proposed transaction, except for the Exclusivity, Confidentiality, [Governing Law / Dispute Resolution], and [No-Solicitation] provisions, which are binding on the parties."
List each binding provision explicitly.
10. Governing Law and Dispute Resolution (BINDING)
- Governing law clause — critically important for cross-border LOIs
- MENA cross-border transactions: consider DIFC / ADGM law and courts for neutrality
- Dispute resolution for binding provisions: courts or expedited arbitration given time-sensitive nature of pre-closing disputes
11. Termination
- Either party may terminate if: conditions cannot be satisfied; material adverse change; due diligence reveals a fundamental problem
- Upon termination: confidentiality obligations survive; exclusivity ceases
Jurisdictional notes
| Jurisdiction |
Key issue |
| UAE (onshore) |
An LOI creating exclusive dealing obligations may be enforceable under UAE Commercial Agency Law or Contract Law even if labeled "non-binding"; ensure the non-binding statement is explicit. |
| KSA |
LOIs with price agreements can be construed as binding offers under Islamic law principles; take care with language. |
| France |
Pre-contractual liability (culpa in contrahendo) is well-developed; withdrawing from negotiations after an LOI without justification can trigger damages liability. |
| DIFC / ADGM |
Common-law approach; courts will look at objective intent to determine which provisions are binding; the explicit binding/non-binding distinction is highly effective. |
| Cross-border |
Where parties are from different jurisdictions, specify governing law of the LOI separately from the governing law anticipated for the definitive agreement. |
Foreign investment approvals: MENA cross-border M&A may require MISA approval in KSA, or UAE regulatory approvals depending on the sector (banking, healthcare, telecoms). Include foreign investment approval as a closing condition.
Common mistakes
- Not specifying which provisions are binding: courts in some civil-law jurisdictions will construe all provisions of a signed document as binding unless expressly excluded; the non-binding statement must be precise.
- Unrealistic due diligence timeline: 60-day exclusivity with 4 weeks of DD is only achievable for small/simple transactions; align the exclusivity period to the actual DD scope.
- No break fee for exclusivity breach: if Target solicits competing offers during exclusivity, Buyer has limited remedy without a contractual break fee.
- Omitting regulatory approval conditions: in GCC transactions involving foreign investment or regulated sectors, failure to include regulatory approval as a closing condition can trap the parties.
Related skills
- [[prompt-pack-memorandum-of-understanding]]
- [[prompt-pack-merger-agreement]]
- [[prompt-pack-joint-venture-agreement]]
- [[prompt-pack-nda-strength-check]]
- [[prompt-pack-ip-due-diligence-checklist]]
1---2name: prompt-pack-letter-of-intent3description: Use when drafting a letter of intent (LOI) or heads of terms for a proposed acquisition, joint venture, partnership, or significant commercial transaction. Carefully distinguishes binding from non-binding provisions, outlines principal commercial terms, addresses exclusivity and confidentiality, and sets the path to definitive agreements. Applicable across MENA, GCC, EU, and common-law jurisdictions.4license: MIT5---67# Letter of Intent89## When to use this1011Use this skill when parties to a significant transaction want to record their preliminary agreement on key terms before investing in full due diligence and definitive documentation. The LOI signals mutual commitment, provides a negotiating framework, and typically triggers exclusivity.1213Triggers:14- "Draft an LOI for the acquisition of [Target]."15- "We've agreed in principle on a JV — write up the heads of terms."16- "Draft a non-binding letter of intent with an exclusivity period of 60 days."1718**LOI vs MOU**: An LOI is typically more transaction-specific and shorter; an MOU is more common for collaborations and government/institutional relationships. Both serve to capture preliminary agreement. Use [[prompt-pack-memorandum-of-understanding]] if the context is a collaboration or institutional arrangement rather than a commercial transaction.1920## Required inputs2122| Input | Why it matters | Default |23|---|---|---|24| Transaction type | M&A / JV / strategic partnership / real estate acquisition | Ask user |25| Party A and Party B names | Identifies the parties | Ask user |26| Key commercial terms | Purchase price, ownership percentages, consideration structure | Ask user |27| Exclusivity period | Duration of exclusivity from signing | 45–60 days is typical; ask user |28| Due diligence scope | What DD is contemplated in the pre-definitive phase | Ask user |29| Governing law | Determines enforceability of binding provisions | Jurisdiction of target or DIFC/ADGM for cross-border |3031## Optional inputs3233- Break fee / termination fee if exclusivity is breached34- Financing condition (if buyer requires debt/equity financing to close)35- Conditions to signing definitive agreement36- Management continuity or retention requirements37- Employee consultation obligations (if regulated merger)38- Board approval conditions3940## Document structure4142### 1. Introduction43- Date and parties (full legal names)44- Brief description of the proposed transaction45- Statement that this LOI is intended to summarize the key terms and does not constitute a binding agreement except as expressly stated4647### 2. Transaction Structure48- Type: acquisition of shares / assets / merger / JV49- Target: description of the business or asset being acquired / invested in50- Buyer / Investor / JV Parties: identity51- Consideration: purchase price or JV equity split; payment structure (cash, shares, deferred, earnout)52- Financing assumption: whether the transaction is subject to financing5354### 3. Key Commercial Terms55Summarize the agreed economic terms:56- Valuation / headline price57- Payment mechanics: upfront vs staged; escrow / holdback arrangements58- Earnout conditions (if any): metric, period, calculation methodology59- Working capital adjustment mechanism60- Representations and warranties: scope expected in the definitive agreement61- Indemnification: general framework (time limits, caps, baskets)6263### 4. Conditions to Signing Definitive Agreements64List conditions that must be satisfied before a definitive agreement can be signed:65- Satisfactory completion of due diligence by Buyer66- Approval by boards of directors of both parties67- Receipt of required regulatory approvals (competition/merger control, foreign investment approvals)68- Resolution of material issues identified in due diligence6970### 5. Exclusivity (BINDING)71This clause is typically **binding**:72- Duration: [45 / 60 / 90] days from date of LOI73- Scope: Target and its shareholders / agents will not solicit, negotiate, or conclude an agreement with any other party regarding a competing transaction74- Extension: may be extended by mutual written agreement75- Effect of breach: Buyer may seek injunctive relief and/or a break fee7677### 6. Confidentiality (BINDING)78- Cross-reference any existing NDA or state that a separate NDA is in effect79- If no NDA exists, include a standalone confidentiality clause binding on both parties80- This clause is typically **binding** even if the rest of the LOI is non-binding8182### 7. Due Diligence Process83- Scope of DD: legal, financial, technical, commercial, tax, environmental, HR84- Access: Target agrees to provide reasonable access to management, documents, and data room85- Timing: DD to be completed within [X] days of LOI signing86- DD reports: Buyer to share summary findings that would require price adjustment8788### 8. Path to Definitive Agreement89- Timeline: parties aim to sign a definitive agreement by [date]90- Documentation: identify the key documents to be negotiated (SPA / MFA / JV Agreement / SHA)91- Counsel: identify lead counsel for each party9293### 9. Non-Binding Nature (IMPORTANT)94State clearly and prominently: "This Letter of Intent is not a binding agreement and creates no legal obligation to consummate the proposed transaction, except for the Exclusivity, Confidentiality, [Governing Law / Dispute Resolution], and [No-Solicitation] provisions, which are binding on the parties."9596List each binding provision explicitly.9798### 10. Governing Law and Dispute Resolution (BINDING)99- Governing law clause — critically important for cross-border LOIs100- MENA cross-border transactions: consider DIFC / ADGM law and courts for neutrality101- Dispute resolution for binding provisions: courts or expedited arbitration given time-sensitive nature of pre-closing disputes102103### 11. Termination104- Either party may terminate if: conditions cannot be satisfied; material adverse change; due diligence reveals a fundamental problem105- Upon termination: confidentiality obligations survive; exclusivity ceases106107## Jurisdictional notes108109| Jurisdiction | Key issue |110|---|---|111| **UAE (onshore)** | An LOI creating exclusive dealing obligations may be enforceable under UAE Commercial Agency Law or Contract Law even if labeled "non-binding"; ensure the non-binding statement is explicit. |112| **KSA** | LOIs with price agreements can be construed as binding offers under Islamic law principles; take care with language. |113| **France** | Pre-contractual liability (culpa in contrahendo) is well-developed; withdrawing from negotiations after an LOI without justification can trigger damages liability. |114| **DIFC / ADGM** | Common-law approach; courts will look at objective intent to determine which provisions are binding; the explicit binding/non-binding distinction is highly effective. |115| **Cross-border** | Where parties are from different jurisdictions, specify governing law of the LOI separately from the governing law anticipated for the definitive agreement. |116117**Foreign investment approvals**: MENA cross-border M&A may require MISA approval in KSA, or UAE regulatory approvals depending on the sector (banking, healthcare, telecoms). Include foreign investment approval as a closing condition.118119## Common mistakes120121- **Not specifying which provisions are binding**: courts in some civil-law jurisdictions will construe all provisions of a signed document as binding unless expressly excluded; the non-binding statement must be precise.122- **Unrealistic due diligence timeline**: 60-day exclusivity with 4 weeks of DD is only achievable for small/simple transactions; align the exclusivity period to the actual DD scope.123- **No break fee for exclusivity breach**: if Target solicits competing offers during exclusivity, Buyer has limited remedy without a contractual break fee.124- **Omitting regulatory approval conditions**: in GCC transactions involving foreign investment or regulated sectors, failure to include regulatory approval as a closing condition can trap the parties.125126## Related skills127128- [[prompt-pack-memorandum-of-understanding]]129- [[prompt-pack-merger-agreement]]130- [[prompt-pack-joint-venture-agreement]]131- [[prompt-pack-nda-strength-check]]132- [[prompt-pack-ip-due-diligence-checklist]]