name: scipy-python
description: >-
Use for writing, reviewing, debugging, or verifying Python numerical work with SciPy optimization, roots, integration, interpolation, sparse matrices, signal, spatial, or statistical routines. Do not use for symbolic algebra, arbitrary-precision arithmetic, or generic NumPy array manipulation alone.
argument-hint: "[SciPy Python task, code, contract, or failure]"
---
# SciPy Python
Use the smallest explicit execution contract that preserves semantics. Inspect
the installed version before relying on a drifting signature. State ownership,
input and output shapes, ordering, failure behavior, and the verification command
before writing substantial code.
## Object and execution model
| Object | Meaning | Boundary |
|---|---|---|
| `objective/residual` | A callable encoding the numerical problem. | Scale, domain, differentiability, and finite-value behavior determine solver suitability. |
| solver result | An estimate plus convergence and diagnostic fields. | A returned vector is not success until status and residual checks pass. |
| sparse matrix | A structure storing selected entries and layout metadata. | Choose CSR/CSC/COO from construction and operation patterns. |
| distribution | A parameterized probability model with numerical methods. | State parameterization and tail/log-space requirements. |
| tolerance | An error scale in input, output, or residual space. | Set it from the application scale, not an unexplained tiny literal. |
Read [the object model](references/object-model.md) when the task mixes two
objects or crosses an execution boundary.
## Workflow
1. State the mathematical problem, domain, scale, and acceptable error.
Choose the routine and derivative/sparsity representation from those properties.
Run with explicit bounds, bracket, tolerances, and iteration budget.
Reject nonconvergence, nonfinite outputs, and excessive residuals.
Test a known solution, boundary case, and failure case.
## Decision rules
- Choose a solver from smoothness, bounds, derivative availability, sparsity, and bracketing information.
Check success or convergence flags and independently verify finite objective, residual, constraint, or reconstruction error.
Scale variables and residuals when magnitudes differ materially; report tolerances in the resulting units.
Provide analytic derivatives only when tested against finite differences or another independent check.
Prefer log-space survival and likelihood functions in tails where direct subtraction loses precision.
Use sparse formats deliberately and avoid accidental dense conversion in production-size paths.
If a required fact is unknown, inspect the target code, installed signature,
schema, shape, or lifecycle owner. Do not replace an unknown with a permissive
fallback. See [the decision guide](references/decision-guide.md).
## Complex solution routes
Load only the matching section of
[the evaluated recipes](references/recipes-solutions.md):
- `scipy.minimize-with-residual-guard` and `scipy.verify-optimality-status`: solve and independently verify a bounded smooth optimum.
scipy.bracketed-root-solve and scipy.verify-root-residual: solve a scalar root with a proof-bearing bracket.
scipy.sparse-solve-with-residual and scipy.verify-sparse-residual: solve a sparse system without accidental densification.
Recipes are anchors, not blind templates. Preserve their named invariants and
adapt types and names only after inspecting the actual boundary.
## Verification contract
- Test observable behavior, not the presence of API tokens.
- Exercise empty, singleton, malformed, and failure inputs when the operation
accepts them.
- Assert shape, dtype or type, ordering, ownership, and error semantics where
they are part of the contract.
- Keep external I/O deterministic with injected clocks, transports, processes,
files, random state, or test doubles.
- Run the narrow test first, then the relevant project suite. Do not declare
completion when warnings, background failures, convergence flags, or cleanup
errors remain unexplained.
Use [the verification matrix](references/verification.md) for completion checks.
## Failure routing and adaptation
Classify a failure before changing code: input-contract failures require a
precise rejection; environment or version failures require inspection; execution
failures require lifecycle, convergence, or cleanup evidence; invariant failures
require a semantic correction. Do not relax a check, coerce a value, broaden a
failure handler, or materialize data merely to make the symptom disappear.
When adapting a recipe:
1. Match its objects, ownership, execution timing, and output contract to the task.
2. Preserve every branch condition and completion check while changing domain names.
3. Add the project's real empty, malformed, duplicate, cancellation, precision, or
boundary case before removing any guard.
4. If the installed API differs, inspect the signature and primary documentation,
then update implementation, test, and authoring evidence together.
## Version grounding
Inspect the installed package and signature when editing an existing project.
Treat examples here as verified anchors for the version recorded by the Foundry,
not as permission to overwrite a repository's compatibility policy. When current
behavior differs, preserve the project target and update tests and authoring
evidence together.
## Completion
Complete the task only when the implementation preserves the declared object
model, no accidental materialization or lifetime extension was introduced, all
failures are surfaced at the correct boundary, and deterministic tests prove the
critical behavior. Report any environment or version fact that could not be
verified.
1---2name: scipy-python3description: ---4---5---6 name: scipy-python7 description: >-8 Use for writing, reviewing, debugging, or verifying Python numerical work with SciPy optimization, roots, integration, interpolation, sparse matrices, signal, spatial, or statistical routines. Do not use for symbolic algebra, arbitrary-precision arithmetic, or generic NumPy array manipulation alone.9 argument-hint: "[SciPy Python task, code, contract, or failure]"10 ---1112 # SciPy Python1314 Use the smallest explicit execution contract that preserves semantics. Inspect15 the installed version before relying on a drifting signature. State ownership,16 input and output shapes, ordering, failure behavior, and the verification command17 before writing substantial code.1819 ## Object and execution model2021 | Object | Meaning | Boundary |22 |---|---|---|23 | `objective/residual` | A callable encoding the numerical problem. | Scale, domain, differentiability, and finite-value behavior determine solver suitability. |24| `solver result` | An estimate plus convergence and diagnostic fields. | A returned vector is not success until status and residual checks pass. |25| `sparse matrix` | A structure storing selected entries and layout metadata. | Choose CSR/CSC/COO from construction and operation patterns. |26| `distribution` | A parameterized probability model with numerical methods. | State parameterization and tail/log-space requirements. |27| `tolerance` | An error scale in input, output, or residual space. | Set it from the application scale, not an unexplained tiny literal. |2829 Read [the object model](references/object-model.md) when the task mixes two30 objects or crosses an execution boundary.3132 ## Workflow3334 1. State the mathematical problem, domain, scale, and acceptable error.352. Choose the routine and derivative/sparsity representation from those properties.363. Run with explicit bounds, bracket, tolerances, and iteration budget.374. Reject nonconvergence, nonfinite outputs, and excessive residuals.385. Test a known solution, boundary case, and failure case.3940 ## Decision rules4142 - Choose a solver from smoothness, bounds, derivative availability, sparsity, and bracketing information.43- Check success or convergence flags and independently verify finite objective, residual, constraint, or reconstruction error.44- Scale variables and residuals when magnitudes differ materially; report tolerances in the resulting units.45- Provide analytic derivatives only when tested against finite differences or another independent check.46- Prefer log-space survival and likelihood functions in tails where direct subtraction loses precision.47- Use sparse formats deliberately and avoid accidental dense conversion in production-size paths.4849 If a required fact is unknown, inspect the target code, installed signature,50 schema, shape, or lifecycle owner. Do not replace an unknown with a permissive51 fallback. See [the decision guide](references/decision-guide.md).5253 ## Complex solution routes5455 Load only the matching section of56 [the evaluated recipes](references/recipes-solutions.md):5758 - `scipy.minimize-with-residual-guard` and `scipy.verify-optimality-status`: solve and independently verify a bounded smooth optimum.59- `scipy.bracketed-root-solve` and `scipy.verify-root-residual`: solve a scalar root with a proof-bearing bracket.60- `scipy.sparse-solve-with-residual` and `scipy.verify-sparse-residual`: solve a sparse system without accidental densification.6162 Recipes are anchors, not blind templates. Preserve their named invariants and63 adapt types and names only after inspecting the actual boundary.6465 ## Verification contract6667 - Test observable behavior, not the presence of API tokens.68 - Exercise empty, singleton, malformed, and failure inputs when the operation69 accepts them.70 - Assert shape, dtype or type, ordering, ownership, and error semantics where71 they are part of the contract.72 - Keep external I/O deterministic with injected clocks, transports, processes,73 files, random state, or test doubles.74 - Run the narrow test first, then the relevant project suite. Do not declare75 completion when warnings, background failures, convergence flags, or cleanup76 errors remain unexplained.7778 Use [the verification matrix](references/verification.md) for completion checks.7980 ## Failure routing and adaptation8182 Classify a failure before changing code: input-contract failures require a83 precise rejection; environment or version failures require inspection; execution84 failures require lifecycle, convergence, or cleanup evidence; invariant failures85 require a semantic correction. Do not relax a check, coerce a value, broaden a86 failure handler, or materialize data merely to make the symptom disappear.8788 When adapting a recipe:8990 1. Match its objects, ownership, execution timing, and output contract to the task.91 2. Preserve every branch condition and completion check while changing domain names.92 3. Add the project's real empty, malformed, duplicate, cancellation, precision, or93 boundary case before removing any guard.94 4. If the installed API differs, inspect the signature and primary documentation,95 then update implementation, test, and authoring evidence together.9697 ## Version grounding9899 Inspect the installed package and signature when editing an existing project.100 Treat examples here as verified anchors for the version recorded by the Foundry,101 not as permission to overwrite a repository's compatibility policy. When current102 behavior differs, preserve the project target and update tests and authoring103 evidence together.104105 ## Completion106107 Complete the task only when the implementation preserves the declared object108 model, no accidental materialization or lifetime extension was introduced, all109 failures are surfaced at the correct boundary, and deterministic tests prove the110 critical behavior. Report any environment or version fact that could not be111 verified.