How do I install the Amendment General skill?

Run npx skillmds@latest add scholarly360/amendment-general in your terminal (requires Node.js), paste this page's agent-chat prompt into Claude, Cursor, or any MCP-connected agent, or download the SKILL.md file and copy it into your agent's skills directory.

Is Amendment General safe to use?

This skill has not completed SkillMD's automated safety review yet. SkillMD never runs a skill's scripts for you; review the SKILL.md before installing.

Which AI agents work with Amendment General?

This skill is tagged as working with Claude Code, Claude.ai, OpenAI Codex. SKILL.md is an open format, so most agents that read a skills directory can load it too.

Is Amendment General free to use?

Yes. Installing skills from SkillMD is free, and the skill stays under its author's original license.

Who published Amendment General?

scholarly360 (@scholarly360) published this skill. Their other Agent Skills are listed on their SkillMD profile.

Amendment General by scholarly360 — Agent Skill

Name: Amendment General
Author: scholarly360

Amendment General

Requires that all changes to the contract be made in writing and signed by authorized representatives of both parties. Prevents informal or unauthorized alterations from undermining the agreed terms.

scholarly360 6ded96d 2 files · 3.7 KB Updated Sep 17, 2026

File contents

Amendment Clause -- General

This skill provides expert-level analysis and drafting assistance for Amendment clauses in General contracts.

When to Activate

Activate this skill when the user:

Uploads or pastes a contract containing a Amendment clause
Asks to draft, redline, or improve a Amendment clause
Asks for a risk assessment of an existing Amendment provision
Mentions keywords: amendment clause, modification, contract change

Workflow

Step 1 -- Intake

Ask the user (if not already provided):

Which party are you representing? (e.g., vendor, client, buyer, seller)
Jurisdiction governing the contract? (e.g., New York, California, England & Wales)
Is this a draft for review or should I generate fresh language?

Step 2 -- Analysis

If reviewing existing language, output the following structure:

## Amendment Clause Analysis

### Plain-Language Summary
[2-3 sentence plain-English description of what the clause does]

### Key Provisions Identified
- [Provision 1]
- [Provision 2]

### Risk Assessment
| Item | Risk Level | Notes |
|------|-----------|-------|
| [item] | High / Medium / Low | [explanation] |

### Recommended Redlines
[Specific suggested changes with rationale]

### Market Standard Comparison
[How this clause compares to typical General market standard]

Step 3 -- Drafting

If generating new language, produce:

Balanced version (neither party-favored)
Favorable to client version
Negotiation notes -- what the other side will likely push back on

Amendment Playbook -- General

See scripts/playbook.md for detailed clause-specific guidance, fallback positions, jurisdiction-specific notes, and precedent language.

Important Notes

Always caveat that output is not legal advice and should be reviewed by qualified counsel.
Flag any provisions that may be unenforceable or jurisdiction-specific.
When jurisdiction is unknown, apply general common-law principles and note assumptions.

---name: amendment-generaldescription: Requires that all changes to the contract be made in writing and signed by authorized representatives of both parties. Prevents informal or unauthorized alterations from undermining the agreed terms.---# Amendment Clause -- GeneralThis skill provides expert-level analysis and drafting assistance for**Amendment** clauses in **General** contracts.---## When to ActivateActivate this skill when the user:- Uploads or pastes a contract containing a Amendment clause- Asks to **draft**, **redline**, or **improve** a Amendment clause- Asks for a **risk assessment** of an existing Amendment provision- Mentions keywords: *amendment clause, modification, contract change*---## Workflow### Step 1 -- IntakeAsk the user (if not already provided):1. **Which party** are you representing? *(e.g., vendor, client, buyer, seller)*2. **Jurisdiction** governing the contract? *(e.g., New York, California, England & Wales)*3. **Is this a draft for review or should I generate fresh language?**### Step 2 -- AnalysisIf reviewing existing language, output the following structure:```## Amendment Clause Analysis### Plain-Language Summary[2-3 sentence plain-English description of what the clause does]### Key Provisions Identified- [Provision 1]- [Provision 2]### Risk Assessment| Item | Risk Level | Notes ||------|-----------|-------|| [item] | High / Medium / Low | [explanation] |### Recommended Redlines[Specific suggested changes with rationale]### Market Standard Comparison[How this clause compares to typical General market standard]```### Step 3 -- DraftingIf generating new language, produce:1. **Balanced version** (neither party-favored)2. **Favorable to client** version3. **Negotiation notes** -- what the other side will likely push back on---## Amendment Playbook -- General> See `scripts/playbook.md` for detailed clause-specific guidance,> fallback positions, jurisdiction-specific notes, and precedent language.---## Important Notes- Always caveat that output is not legal advice and should be reviewed by qualified counsel.- Flag any provisions that may be unenforceable or jurisdiction-specific.- When jurisdiction is unknown, apply general common-law principles and note assumptions.

Frequently asked questions