How do I install the Non Compete Employment skill?

Run npx skillmds@latest add scholarly360/non-compete-employment in your terminal (requires Node.js), paste this page's agent-chat prompt into Claude, Cursor, or any MCP-connected agent, or download the SKILL.md file and copy it into your agent's skills directory.

Is Non Compete Employment safe to use?

This skill has not completed SkillMD's automated safety review yet. SkillMD never runs a skill's scripts for you; review the SKILL.md before installing.

Which AI agents work with Non Compete Employment?

This skill is tagged as working with Claude Code, Claude.ai, OpenAI Codex. SKILL.md is an open format, so most agents that read a skills directory can load it too.

Is Non Compete Employment free to use?

Yes. Installing skills from SkillMD is free, and the skill stays under its author's original license.

Who published Non Compete Employment?

scholarly360 (@scholarly360) published this skill. Their other Agent Skills are listed on their SkillMD profile.

Non Compete Employment by scholarly360

Name: Non Compete Employment
Author: scholarly360

Non Compete Employment

Analyze, draft, and review Non-Compete clauses for Employment contracts. Use when the user mentions non-compete, non-solicitation, restrictive covenant, or asks to review, redline, or generate this clause type. Returns structured risk assessment, plain-language summary, and suggested alternative language.

scholarly360 Updated Sep 17, 2026

File contents

Non-Compete Clause -- Employment

This skill provides expert-level analysis and drafting assistance for Non-Compete clauses in Employment contracts.

When to Activate

Activate this skill when the user:

Uploads or pastes a contract containing a Non-Compete clause
Asks to draft, redline, or improve a Non-Compete clause
Asks for a risk assessment of an existing Non-Compete provision
Mentions keywords: non-compete, non-solicitation, restrictive covenant

Workflow

Step 1 -- Intake

Ask the user (if not already provided):

Which party are you representing? (e.g., vendor, client, buyer, seller)
Jurisdiction governing the contract? (e.g., New York, California, England & Wales)
Is this a draft for review or should I generate fresh language?

Step 2 -- Analysis

If reviewing existing language, output the following structure:

## Non-Compete Clause Analysis

### Plain-Language Summary
[2-3 sentence plain-English description of what the clause does]

### Key Provisions Identified
- [Provision 1]
- [Provision 2]

### Risk Assessment
| Item | Risk Level | Notes |
|------|-----------|-------|
| [item] | High / Medium / Low | [explanation] |

### Recommended Redlines
[Specific suggested changes with rationale]

### Market Standard Comparison
[How this clause compares to typical Employment market standard]

Step 3 -- Drafting

If generating new language, produce:

Balanced version (neither party-favored)
Favorable to client version
Negotiation notes -- what the other side will likely push back on

Non-Compete Playbook -- Employment

See scripts/playbook.md for detailed clause-specific guidance, fallback positions, jurisdiction-specific notes, and precedent language.

Important Notes

Always caveat that output is not legal advice and should be reviewed by qualified counsel.
Flag any provisions that may be unenforceable or jurisdiction-specific.
When jurisdiction is unknown, apply general common-law principles and note assumptions.

---name: non-compete-employmentdescription: Analyze, draft, and review Non-Compete clauses for Employment contracts. Use when the user mentions non-compete, non-solicitation, restrictive covenant, or asks to review, redline, or generate this clause type. Returns structured risk assessment, plain-language summary, and suggested alternative language.---# Non-Compete Clause -- EmploymentThis skill provides expert-level analysis and drafting assistance for**Non-Compete** clauses in **Employment** contracts.---## When to ActivateActivate this skill when the user:- Uploads or pastes a contract containing a Non-Compete clause- Asks to **draft**, **redline**, or **improve** a Non-Compete clause- Asks for a **risk assessment** of an existing Non-Compete provision- Mentions keywords: *non-compete, non-solicitation, restrictive covenant*---## Workflow### Step 1 -- IntakeAsk the user (if not already provided):1. **Which party** are you representing? *(e.g., vendor, client, buyer, seller)*2. **Jurisdiction** governing the contract? *(e.g., New York, California, England & Wales)*3. **Is this a draft for review or should I generate fresh language?**### Step 2 -- AnalysisIf reviewing existing language, output the following structure:```## Non-Compete Clause Analysis### Plain-Language Summary[2-3 sentence plain-English description of what the clause does]### Key Provisions Identified- [Provision 1]- [Provision 2]### Risk Assessment| Item | Risk Level | Notes ||------|-----------|-------|| [item] | High / Medium / Low | [explanation] |### Recommended Redlines[Specific suggested changes with rationale]### Market Standard Comparison[How this clause compares to typical Employment market standard]```### Step 3 -- DraftingIf generating new language, produce:1. **Balanced version** (neither party-favored)2. **Favorable to client** version3. **Negotiation notes** -- what the other side will likely push back on---## Non-Compete Playbook -- Employment> See `scripts/playbook.md` for detailed clause-specific guidance,> fallback positions, jurisdiction-specific notes, and precedent language.---## Important Notes- Always caveat that output is not legal advice and should be reviewed by qualified counsel.- Flag any provisions that may be unenforceable or jurisdiction-specific.- When jurisdiction is unknown, apply general common-law principles and note assumptions.

Frequently asked questions