SDiamante13 Refactor the class provided in $ARGUMENTS to adhere to the Single Responsibility Principle by extracting classes and simplifying the design.
Instructions:
- Identify all responsibilities within the given class
- Group related methods and properties by their cohesive purpose
- Extract each responsibility into its own focused class
- Consider alternative, simpler designs that make future changes easier
- Ensure each resulting class has only one reason to change
Analysis approach:
- Identify responsibilities by:
- Methods that serve different actors/users
- Distinct areas of functionality
- Different reasons for change
- Unrelated data and behavior groupings
- Infrastructure vs domain logic separation
- I/O operations vs business logic
Common responsibility patterns to separate:
- Data persistence/storage from business logic
- Validation logic from core behavior
- Formatting/presentation from domain logic
- External service communication from internal logic
- Configuration from implementation
- Factory/creation logic from usage
- Orchestration/coordination from execution
- Logging/metrics from business operations
Output format:
- Current responsibilities: List each identified responsibility with supporting methods/properties
- Proposed class structure:
- Name and purpose of each extracted class
- Methods and properties it would contain
- Clear single responsibility statement
- Refactored design: Show the transformed code structure
- Alternative designs: Present 1-2 simpler alternatives if applicable
- Benefits: Explain how each extraction improves:
- Testability
- Maintainability
- Flexibility for change
- Code clarity
Design principles to apply:
- Prefer composition over inheritance
- Keep classes small and focused
- High cohesion within classes
- Low coupling between classes
- Clear, single purpose for each class
- Consider using interfaces for flexibility